Table

Toaru Majutsu no Index(Anime)

Other media
Comics:To aru majutsu no index / Novel:Toaru Majutsu no Index (The ''Index-Librorum-Prohibitorum'' of a certain magic)

Reviews' statics

Anime rank	Rank 2,407/in 2,757 titles (Total -4.00)	Rank 2,406 <= => Rank 2,408
Anime average pnts rank	Rank 1,223/in 1,463 titles (Average -0.25(Good))	Rank 1,222 <= => Rank 1,224
Anime rank of 2008	Rank 106/in 127 titles	Rank 105 <= => Rank 107

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Image gallery

Information about this title

Chiba Television TV Kanagawa MBS(Mainichi Broadcasting System) TeleTama Chubu-Nippon Broadcasting Co.,Ltd. AT-X BANDAI CHANNEL CO., LTD.
Kazuma Kamachi Electric Library ASCII MEDIA WORKS Inc.
Hiroshi Nishikiori
Masanao Akahoshi
I've
Delfisound Inc.
J.C.STAFF
Mami Kawada Kazuya Takase Yuka Iguti
Rina Satou Shizuka Ito Kishow Taniyama
Anri Katsu Kimiko Koyama Satomi Arai Nobuhiko Okamoto

Released:2008/10/05 in Japan

Official sites
1. http://www.project-index.net/ (Translation)
2. http://gangan.square-enix.co.jp/index/ (Translation)

Opening movie
1. http://jp.youtube.com/watch?v=15YAxG_6dhA

Ending movie
1. http://jp.youtube.com/watch?v=93xzE6NpqyQ

Promotion video
1. YouTube - To Aru Majutsu no Index Promo
2. http://jp.youtube.com/watch?v=lDfvrnGuDHY

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	AnimeRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Good(-0.25)	2,407	46.87	-4.00

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	10,821	29	16
Outside Japan	153	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

6.2%

25.0%

0.0%

12.5%

31.2%

12.5%

Added percentage

6.2%

31.2%

43.7%

74.9%

87.4%

100%

Summary

31.2%

12.5%

56.2%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14
37 4 4 4 2 3 12 2 6

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) All
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	All

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/11/22 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by Kanchi Provider: 30227 Host:30066 Browser: 6342
comics -- skillful くまとめていた -- irrespective of -- animation -- this -- it can do .....
In spite of having proved becoming without being able to cut explanation etc., stuffing the talk forcibly and losing from a part for a translation, if an original carries out the skillful く arrangement also of the useless work by comics, is it what it considers for whether it is original fan appeal at the original author?
Although it also regards lifting a work with a low level as important.
if it is this -- "-- a certain science -- super- -- electromagnetism -- gun" should have been animation-ized -- if .

2008/11/18 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by ZAZAZA Provider: 3985 Host:3770 Browser: 4184
Although he liked the original, it had what or sense of incongruity.
It is looking and is painful.
Especially Kamijo's voice and comics are, although it is interesting ...

2008/11/17 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by kakakakkaa Provider: 28420 Host:28739 Browser: 5234
Although viewed and listened to six talks, it already bears and does not go out.
It is a sermon of a hero and the length of explanation which it is looking and were considered most unpleasantly.
Those things occupied most of for [ of one talk ] 30 minutes (in formal about 24 minutes).
It is already heard and unzari(ed).
since -- viewing and listening is given up

2008/11/17 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by 海月さん Provider: 30269 Host:30458 Browser: 7505
Original non-読.
It expects that there will not be what and kana and that such expression is carried out by animation although it may be such, considering an original, that already cut explanation scene raw [ unusual ] will be tired of being considerable, and above all, to it, since there are very few benefits called fun and returns, it cannot bear viewing and listening at all.
For ま and one talk, だり which goes away is [ whether it is peak だったんじゃないっす and ] a cloth team.

2008/11/16 Comment(bad) [Original Japanese review]
by 煎 Provider: 41572 Host:41699 Browser: 8090
This is ikan!
The beginning is too the worst.
Eye one talk "What do you want to come and carry out?
I think only ".
Even if it comes to 5 and 6 talk, it does not understand yet .....
If it comes out and memory is lost at last ....
It comes out and is ?.
A genre is also unknown.
It is whether this conflict will be lost if it sees as it is ...

2008/11/12 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by Surasshu Provider: 8298 Host:8408 Browser: 5234

[Good point]
Illustrating is beautiful.
Force of a battle scene.
Voice actor appointment.

[Bad point]
Even if the contents of the talk are looking difficultly, they are not understood in many cases.
Explanation is borings a little indiscriminately for a long time.

[Comprehensive evaluation]
I do not think that it is now so interesting.

2008/11/10 Comment(bad) [Original Japanese review]
by Naooki Provider: 4752 Host:4656 Browser: 8090

[Good point]
A theme song, illustrating.
Three talks out of which the female swordsman came were able to be enjoyed so so.

[a bad point]
-- a technical term -- many woman characters -- a small-child form -- many one is privately regrettable
[Comprehensive evaluation]
although compared with shana -- shana -- different -- the battle of the beginning -- there is also especially no everyday depiction in if it is alike and there is no brightness -- it carries out, and since a love side is not moved especially, either (3 drawing relation), it does not seem to be not much interesting

2008/11/09 Best! [Original Japanese review]
by Momotetsu Provider: 40340 Host:40266 Browser: 4926

[A good point]
It was as having expected by the battle system.
Since the original is not cutting, it wants to see the point early.
Are two periods of treatment done?

[A bad point]
The talk is sometimes ないっす from わ.

[Comprehensive evaluation]
It is ね when periods of treatment [ two ] "all about 24 talks" Doing..

2008/11/06 Comment(normal) [Original Japanese review]
by Rene Laloux Provider: 18364 Host:18486 Browser: 7856

[Good point]
Illustrating is stable.

[Bad point]
A view of the world does not receive individually.

[Comprehensive evaluation]
Between futsuu and a bad thing.
magic -- at any rate -- science = supernatural power -- bundling -- がす -- にい -- た .
Although it is the feature of this work that there is two kinds of different capability of a super-usual state, since both were fictitious views of the world, when a battle is carried out, in order to convince a televiewer of the phenomenon and principle, words are likely to pass indiscriminately and are likely to be explanatory argumentatively.
A showy effect is thrown and it is.
being certain -- it is -- ending -- coming -- long ago -- magic っぽい -- a showy effect and supernatural power っぽい -- is it in つっぱしる in the laver of a soul system?
It is * regarded as it being private very common animation.
It is being [ it / although it is at least speech ぶっちゃう grassy-smelling / the hero is desperate from naze or the beginning, although my heroine is protected, and / as the enemy partner concerning murder, if it is why there / ...
] kana since it is a hero constitution.
し [ my heroine also comes down from first meeting sky ].
In fact, is it among old royal road pattern どまん?

2008/11/04 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by Fusuu Provider: 44280 Host:44344 Browser: 3646
It is original non-読.
It saw to three talks.
be fastidious -- a setup of running fire of the 創られた technical term in connection with "shana of 灼眼" magic in that it sees and is alike having carried out なぁーって recollections which was complicated and was complicated Music of OP, and atmosphere of a picture.
It fights with a pursuer, helping the girl who has come to live at other's expense suddenly.
Rough structure is well alike and thought whether the layer which was looking at shana would move out as it is later.
Drawing is beautiful and moves very well.
Since the heroine was also touch pitiable to interesting it, I thought that it was nice.
However, although it can also say shana, I think whether unless the way currently seen is completely soaked in the 創られた setup and it can enjoy a work of this sort, it would get cold somehow.
Individually, shana enters and gets bored with the second term, and is ちゃった.
It diminished and this was also useless.
why -- かなぁ -- と -- when considered, thought and seen, or it was three talks -- deeply -- と -- although there was a scene which describes a setup of the organization which coils round a magic document, it withered in that place Since it may be there and some men may excite interest, it is まぁ liking.
Therefore, although it stops seeing in three talks individually and being cooked, as evaluation, it is a "normal." Since it thinks that it is not a bad work with it being another.
Among those, or [ seeing again if mind is suitable ].

2008/11/04 Comment(bad) [Original Japanese review]
by ジャイケル=マクソン Provider: 21558 Host:21294 Browser: 5348
As [ be / a slightly forcing place / in a story ] -- There are many places which can read deployment.
It is [ that a hero is how and ] however the back.
It gets hot suddenly and there is a paragraph which is not transmitted [ wanting what to say and ].
But since it is still the middle, view and listen to all.

2008/11/03 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by Koropokkuru Provider: 1891 Host:1810 Browser: 6313
Although seen to five talks, I think that it is now very good.
It was very worrisome how it will go ahead with the talk future activity of the girl using the electric shock which a setup is very elaborate, thought that illustrating was also kirei, and came out first, and from now on.

[Bad point]
I think that it is conspicuous only by having still started and there is especially no place of being bad.

[Comprehensive evaluation]
Since seemingly it is two periods of treatment, it is just going to be worrisome to constitute the talk how.

2008/11/03 Comment(normal) [Original Japanese review]
by Natsume Provider: 24938 Host:24751 Browser: 4317
It is evaluation of those who are not reading the original.
for the time being -- illustrating, a story, and a setup -- being alike -- it had a favorable impression considerably To it, OP, and ED I think that this hit has improved.
I saw a hero's boy have seen three talks and have talked for a long time to the girl of a sword, and thought that this was slightly unsavory.
Probably, it will be amusing that only that has talked during a battle.
Although it thought that it was interesting, it became uneasy about how it progresses after this.

2008/11/02 Comment(bad) [Original Japanese review]
by Ramuda Provider: 31395 Host:31164 Browser: 8753
It says clearly.
Tempo is bad.
An original does not know.
Illustrating thinks whether to be the direction which is carrying out so so stability.
けど which music does not have well, either, there is not bad and does not remain in an excessive impression.
It is thought that a setup is elaborate fairly.
Is it popular ranobe truly?
However, in the regrettable thing, the evil of the light novel being an original has appeared distinctly.
It is clearly as unnatural as gudaguda in a conversation long during a battle.
Since this calls it the people of the church of a necessary evil, it will laugh.
Is it because it is two crews?
A pause of the talk can seldom be seen.
I cannot think that there are also characters about individuality.
Does the numerousness of the characters accelerate it too?
Did anything have a meaning as for the appearance of the first female student?
Although it thinks that it is related the future when it is coming out on the way again, how many leading figures are there really?
At most, story deployment in which all the members are involved says more than 20 that it is long, suits, and is a place needed in a work called short-term animation.
Although this may be the first reason, it does not care for a hero's character too.
I want the conflict scene which starts with suddenly whether it is the evil of origin being a text to also pardon this.
it still crosses -- as -- although it is not visible, since science and magic seemingly cross from now on I want to see to a slight degree, hiding some expectations, since there is a strong thing in the base of a setup.

2008/10/29 Comment(bad) [Original Japanese review]
by スペ9 Provider: 19044 Host:18792 Browser: 8090
The "immaturity" which the original itself is probably holding is here [ there ] many, and pitiful.
There is the thing a "promise" in a battle scene.
when it sets up that a certain character excels in "a certain capability", the "promise" should pierce -- と -- it is the point to say It is not who [ any ] other than tea table return that a punch will ask the partner who had kobushi nimbly exchanged before an instant etc., either.
When it was って and the oiliness "ink spreads although a copy paper does not melt" generally, and a toner, he planned to have carried out what.
?
She who was moved by the hero begins to give lengthy situation explanation also of the exchange with the 女刀 usage who appeared in three talks.
It is convinced in that it is あぁ original ranobe and it being the excess of explanation.
It is eye 興ざ that a setup of not only this scene but a very much interesting index is explained by conversation each time.
It is that a certain ranobe editor called it "the thing which character-ized the comics (animation) which became complicated [ ranobe ] too much, and made them intelligible." Then, the ranobe is called [ the ] bad sample of 、 for what becomes, if it changes まんま animation (comics).
Moreover, the fields as a battle thing are also those with an error to grammar.
soon -- "-- my -- it is not related -- it is likely to become "

2008/10/28 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by Orugasumu Provider: 21632 Host:21773 Browser: 8090
Although it seems that a sad thing has much disrepute, for me who read the original, it is a quite interesting work.
It thinks that the voice actor also suits and illustrating is very good above all.
it is what although evaluation tends to become low by a hero's thing -- I say and think that Kamijo this hemp is the good fellow with a sense of justice who bit (Having said to be sure is 「ん occasionally.) it becomes [ ^^; ] 」ってたま it is -- although -- there is also a bad point too Is it a point with too insufficient explanation?
I think that a hero's character and explanation of probably evaluation of this work being the low cause are insufficient.
actually -- animation -- seeing -- "説明 -- a few is not excluded Can those who are not original 読ん follow?
The part " was a result saw and as expected at the time about evaluation of a あり and other people in some places.
When seeing this, without my also reading an original, possibly it had become a delicate work in me.
Evaluation is at "it is very good" by an original sheep reader having a kitsui scene, however it may think, although I am interesting.

2008/10/28 Comment(bad) [Original Japanese review]
by Kotatsu Provider: 2339 Host:2336 Browser: 6342
Eye four talks was seen.
It thought that two persons' setup which plays a bad fellow purposely was interesting, and an index is also dear.
But a hero only says, "It does not play a trick in せえ" or " in which it deals", and although it is weak, signs that the target is reproached for a female swordsman's man on the other hand in unconvincing words say clearly, and do not eat on a their mind.
A hero's arrogance and for the first time in [ a hypocrite ] cannot bear truly.
Although it thinks that a situation will already be seen just for a moment つ of an image bad for the moment is good.

2008/10/28 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by わいわいチャーハいらん! Provider: 18410 Host:18496 Browser: 9190

[Good point]
It was a 3 cups of boiled rice margin in -index たん.
- In bad setting up a
[point]
and this time, it cannot finish carrying out in a setting student.

[Comprehensive evaluation]
If it says bad well, it will be mass-produced type animation.
The type which often exists in recent years of having made into animation ranobe by which the hint and the climax were exactly prepared well in the story.
A place [ it says whether to become the animation of a season higher rank now, if a story gets well henceforth / 6 talks / individually, although it seems that the setup is not utilizable since a thing still but called science at this time (the 4th talk) by incomprehensible setup for some too the place where 3 called the hero who makes nothing all of confrontation of magic and science and it standards are interesting has not appeared as ups and downs on the story ].
Of course, the attention character after this is 美琴 of a science camp, whatever it may call it!
The female character of this animation is a good impression individually.
words -- although a belt is felt slightly painful, if it is ranobe well -- being such -- rubbing -- しょう

2008/10/26 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by Igujito Provider: 9754 Host:10075 Browser: 8090
Although it sees and becomes precocious only to two talks, words each of each characters is painful anyhow -- whenever [ which explains very, and exist one by one from opening although it is hot ] -- "-- it is unhappy -- only dislike has been held in the hero who fires -" although it is good that it is an unhappy character -- purposely -- him -- "-- I am unhappy How will direct an unhappy character only by making it call it " earnestly.
Although it is not independently if you dislike the character, it is not interesting that "That is such translations" is explained in a jumble with やたら by the monologue at all.
the expression which tries to look good and is slippery utterly and which is likely to be considered also by whom is also attached to a nose -- conjointly -- displeasure -- it is supreme If it is called raitonoberu っぽい, it will be to it.
Although it thinks that a setup of magic etc.
is interesting, isn't only a setup elaborate like an original and can it hardly harness in this editing?
Although the やたら brains 戦っぽい production was carried out in the battle in an apartment etc.
and being cooked better, the punch line disappointment past てびっくり(ed) ....
No, even a sprinkler comes out by no means, and it is that oh, も skillful く逆転 can be carried out.
the enemy who has not taken the measures against waterproofing at all -- enough -- "-- although it is and えね-" was thought -- more than it -- a hero -- elated mind -- "ふふん -- in fact, it spreads in aquatic life pen って水 -- ぜ It smiled at having begun to explain " etc.
An original has the impression that the final stage is quite sweet, and is [ the comics version is comparatively interesting and / ?
] "'s interesting by media other than a novel only by there being no text power, when carrying out a deer?
It was a disappointment, although " was thought and a few was expected.

2008/10/26 Comment(good) [Original Japanese review]
by 金龍 Provider: 27492 Host:27816 Browser: 6313
Is it since the Kawada まみ has sung OP, or the calm color tone in illustrating which is worn with shana?
Although the time when a genre called an exceptionally talented power battle can be enjoyed obediently had already passed before fairly, it was thought that this work was interesting.
But it is still eye three talks.
Argument involving 魔導書 unfolded in the world where two kinds of capability of "magic" and "supernatural power" exists.
That it is a point here should say that "magic" is the capability which the man who cannot use "supernatural power" got by efforts.
It is [ whether when thinking that it is a saw setup in somewhere, it is completely the same as positioning of the "magic" and the "summons way" in a tail zuobu fantasia, and ].
Genius and genius are likely to fight for a capability side and it is interesting in it.
A setup is kneaded.
the light novel with which only そりゃ and that are taking out the number of turns -- animation -- it is-izing First of all, popularity to the extent that it is animation-ized will not come out, either, when the talk will not continue like that, if a setup is appropriate.
You could not make it nonchalantly reflected in a story to there, although it will be the talk which a normal understands if it considers very that "fantasy murder" of a hero and the affinity of recovery magic are also bad, if the foundation has not carried out just.
Proof of [ to a story ] skillful く盛り込めている for a setup called [ also saying / that the index returned to taking a hood /, or ] the search of magic.
Since the original and the story are guaranteed, which scene does the rest start how?
I delete which talk and think that it becomes a big showplace which scene is shown.
Since the number of talks is restricted, although skillful くまとめる is the most difficult work, I think that I want you to make deployment to which it is made to glue upon a televiewer's eyes.

Next / Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.