Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Anime ranking: Rank 2,519/in 2,689 titles (Total -12.00/Deviation 45.90) Rank 2,518 <= => Rank 2,520
Anime average points ranking: Rank 1,211/in 1,399 titles (Average -0.40(Good)/Deviation 38.28) Rank 1,210 <= => Rank 1,212 (more than 10 evaluatoin)
Anime ranking of 2001: Rank 83/in 91 titles Rank 82 <= => Rank 84

Cyber adventure Webdiver (Dennou Boukenki Webdiver)(Anime)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Information about this title

TV TOKYO Corporation Hiroshi Negishi
Mayori Sekizi Yasuhiro Moriki Hayashiyuzo RADIX
Hideaki Takatori Kisaburo Suzuki Seiichi Kyoda Hironobu Kageyama
Yumiko Kobayashi Sugita Tomokazu Siho Kikuchi
Masataka Nakai Kaida Yuki Nobuo Tobita
Tokuyoshi Kawashima Hiroyuki Yoshino Yuuichi Nakamura
Suzumura Kenichi Reiko Takagi Masaaki Ohkura
Eriko Kawasaki Yuuko Maekawa Yumi Kakazu
Nami Kurokawa Miyako Itou Yumiko Nakanishi
Akio Nojima Ai Uchikawa

[Detail]

Michio Miyashita Akio Suyama Katsuyuki Konishi Shinji Kawada
Fumihiko Tachiki

Released:2001/04/06 in Japan End:2002/03/29 in Japan

Official sites
1. http://www.radixzero.co.jp/WebDiver/top.htm (Translation)

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	AnimeRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Good(-0.40)	2,519	45.90	-12.00

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	8,337	31	30
Outside Japan	657	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

3.3%

6.7%

20.0%

23.3%

16.7%

23.3%

6.7%

Added percentage

3.3%

10%

30%

53.3%

70%

93.3%

100%

Summary

30%

23.3%

46.7%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 6 5 4 3 2 1 31 30
2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/03/13 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by ゼロ7 Provider: 18003 Host:17739 Browser: 4661
CG of robo is quite shobo かった although the story was interesting so so.

2008/02/09 Comment(good) [Original Japanese review]
by 闇夜のフェンリル Provider: 26798 Host:26659 Browser: 6386
Although a setup of a person, a voice actor, illustrating, the density of a tale, the tempo of the talk, etc.
are very good ...
The badness which can do CG offsets each other, and it is now peevish, and is this.
If a robot's battle scene is also drawn exactly, since evaluation thinks that it is the work which became quite high, it is regrettable.

2008/02/08 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by 杉元 Provider: 5200 Host:5125 Browser: 5832
[Good point] Point which is Kent, the heart of guradeion, and the heart which a theme song and an insertion song with them say very, and the voice of kyara suits very of coming into contact with [ the uncanny contents and ] [ interesting ] [Bad point] A battle scene completely impresses a motion, it twists, and a paper play and guradeion are pakuri of dynamite gain clearly completely.
[Comprehensive evaluation] Although fun is 5, of course in 5 stage evaluations, synthesis will become low with 3.
too -- a battle scene and guradeion -- pakuri -- いう -- て -- although -- it is the touch which is subtracted

2006/08/25 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Anti666 Provider: 21255 Host:21128 Browser: 5234
As for the drama which does not have topicalization undue importance, topicalization of 数あれど and 本作 was the animation which is not undue importance.
It is on account of [ by the robot which becomes an outline ] a battle.
It was the condition which it has depended on the wind said to CG which cannot be treated as the circle throw, and the battle scene from which it became an enmity completely does not have minimum force, and was said "The portion used as the liver of robot animation carries out what now" poor.
although it will be "very good" if private feeling is pushed out, if the basis of a genre does not change at all -- severe -- not carrying out -- this evaluation is a limit, when not obtaining but attaching popularity Although performance by the members of a voice actor gorgeous in opposite side desperation suited full marks ...
Incidentally the number of miscastings was zero.
As robot animation for children, there was a part more than the passing mark partly besides this point.
He all liked Kageyama hironobu Mr.
歌う OP and ED, and OP also became the cause to see 本作 the first stage which was smart particularly especially.
Unlike "daigandaa" of back watch, a robot and human being regard a design as still proud of good quality remarkable for for children.
the contents -- the web world -- the stage -- と -- since a new trial and a new setup were also seen, it was fairly good Collapse of illustrating was not conspicuous, either, as far as it remembers, although it began to see from the inside of the first half - the final stage.
Although it is made for these points to groan as "considering that it to have been made in 2001", if it restricts to the battle scene used as the cause of giving this evaluation mentioned to the beginning, it will grumble with "even though it was made in 2001 ..." When compared with it, the angels of the "Sherman king" were still visible also to mashi.

2006/01/15 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by Jarusu Provider: 5152 Host:4997 Browser: 4184
The song was also good, the talk was not so bad, and it is also a mechanism...
Although there was nothing bad well, when it thought now, the battle was very sorry spoilt to be for the place where a motion of CG is quite blunt.
However, if the voice of guradeion suited by Tomokazu Sugita and a part of kyara also removes a strange hair form, with so bad a work, I will think that there is nothing.
the trash overwhelmingly struck now if the bluntness of a battle is removed rather -- aftertaste is also farther [ than Animation SEEDDESTINY ] good -- coming out -- sushi and the talk -- being honest -- the bluntness of that shota and the danger of 801 are also by 孕ん although it is a work, and a battle -- adding -- evaluation -- "-- it is usually " -- serving ....
(Although it is a favorite work individually ...)

2005/11/19 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by 忍 Provider: 28390 Host:28326 Browser: 4184
Since OP was smart, it carried out now [ 見ちゃ ] just!!
CG as you tell on the other hand but -- I wanted you to already make just for a moment, having time-applied it firmly - he liked the song and it is bad -- coming out -- there is nothing -- usually -- coming out -- !!

2005/11/19 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by Batou Provider: 14175 Host:14198 Browser: 5234
for the time being, my aoi of the greatest reason I viewed and listened to 今作 was dear -- a word is boiled and it is exhausted Since the song was also pleased with it, it decided to continue seeing for a while.
The result was interesting in it being unexpected.
Although CG design was inferior, since it was seldom taking into consideration, it was able to be seen ordinarily.
It was also pleased that a classmate wakes up one by one.
However, I did not think that a life in the uninhabited island in the cyber- world of the second half was interesting also in a compliment.
other characters be involved perfectly -- when carrying out た展開, evaluation different again was also completed I think that my aoi and the song were seen as a guide the second half.

2005/07/25 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Aruvisu Provider: 45551 Host:45499 Browser: 3875
Aside from the mechanism dithering, the contents were good till the first half.
し [ the lowness of the level of CG and the efforts which it is going to cover from production were seen somehow ].
It says clearly and is not needed the second half.
An enemy is vainly strong and an ally becomes weak unusually.
It was felt really useless.
Since he incidentally seldom remembers by having not made rasubosu to daitarion the second half although it is "bad" in "it is good" the second half the first half even if it does not sell, synthesis "is good."

2005/07/24 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by Tsunakite Provider: 12676 Host:12322 Browser: 4184
CG was severe...
Only it was the work with which the impression does not remain.
It gives up because of 数話.
It was looking and was hot.
I thought that it merely went into the category interesting as a talk.
し [ it was finished very finely except the cyber- world ].
CG of already a battle of ...
is too severe...
That pulls a leg completely and it is a better seed ...
I think that only CG is not the level which was able to be seen.
...
It is if the way of CG is also avoided...
I surely continued seeing, did and thought that evaluation had also gone up individually.

2005/06/21 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by たつ一郎 Provider: 42635 Host:42625 Browser: 3646
Individually, it is a favorite work.
When disgusted with the medaroto soul of a last program, I see a new program preliminary announcement and think that this thinks !!
to arrange, sees and is a correct answer.
First, each theme song is good.
be fastidious -- it is ぞ super robot animation -- I thought - fully the に at which deployment of the talk does not sell 媚 to an animation fan, either -- 勇 person series once as animation for children -- it is a みたいな royal road route, a character is also free from vice, and a voice actor is also rather gorgeous However, it is regrettable that the robot drawn by CG is wretched and that the classmate without turn and the web night were very well.
However, even if it deducts it, I think that I am sufficiently interesting.
(especially second half) I just think that it is true hot blood robot animation.

2004/10/03 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by 殉死者エルリケ Provider: 15491 Host:15432 Browser: 6479
OP was very good.
The volume on 話本 is viewing-and-listening stop better た in the middle of one talk.
Since it is not got blocked.
Although got to know by CM of those days, the system with which connects a robot to TV and it plays was a question very much about for which age it is really carrying out.

2004/10/03 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by Raito Provider: 3496 Host:3307 Browser: 3646
since the parenthesis of the music of OP was very good, although some also looked at this editing, --CG which was -- is painful once -- elapsing -- the contents of -- this -- i って取り立てて -- which cannot be regarded as interesting -- there was also deployment which burns occasionally so so well -- surely -- coming out -- although it is ....
therefore -- evaluation -- "it is bad"

2004/10/03 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by 麟 Provider: 8565 Host:8836 Browser: 4928
Illustrating and the song of OP were good.
Although the mechanism whom the Moriki 靖泰 designed was also good, I think that failure did it by CG.
Illustrated kyara should not be suited.
With that へぼ [ .....
] CG

2004/10/03 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by SP Provider: 12862 Host:12540 Browser: 4925
If CG does by hebo かった hebo い CG, it will carry out by hand-drawn, and it is あ.
But he liked the view of the world.

2004/09/22 Good [Original Japanese review]
by 暁舞華 Provider: 28414 Host:28359 Browser: 6455
I think that I was fairly good.
When merely forcing and saying, it was regrettable that it is the Kent ばっ loan.
I wanted to have "show and naoki" naoki [ not the Kent fixation but "Jean, naoki", "show and Jean", and ] seen, and to also see the combination [ た / combination ] in "virtual diver land editing" of the second half It is 42 talks that it cannot be convinced.
although the reason which Kite and naoki repel is known -- show ..
?
-- individual -- "a show x aoi system" -- a scene does not accumulate -- it cut (<- -- return) * 44 talks were [ * ] the highest at maji

2004/08/07 Good [Original Japanese review]
by kinji Provider: 22931 Host:22801 Browser: 4483
The 1st time which it began to see somehow.
"which appeared in the credit -- the time of carrying out a supervisor Welsh onion, and seeing the name of Hiroshi" -- "-- it is useless -- こりゃ [!!
] -- " -- swift attack -- considering -- TV 消 -- although it thought that that was right, if it gaman and this editing is seen -- it was fairly interesting unexpectedly Near future.
When the day "the amusement park in a cyber" which has the "island" which manages the cyber- network which connects the world, and has the children who live there is played, of who attack will be received, and 300,000 children will be left behind to cyberspace all over the world.
(Being unable to log out actually なっちゃう) the story -- to which the program this attack is a thing from the security program (it has self) to which it ran in the network recklessly, and "betrayed" the security program in it begins to fight with a hero's boy in fact A program is fought with a "robot form" by cyberspace.
(it is -- since -- it is a "robot thing") ...."-" and having considered suddenly however, although such 1st talks were seen considering -- "ありゃ -- it was heard by this talk and somewhere -- it wrote by itself -- ?" [ -- disagreeableness and ] [ who did not hear it ] [ -- ] As [ resembled / kore / a basic setup of the story written when the work of "being plot 書いてくれ of a story as adventure gyarugee of a network thing" came from the game company (already crushed now) which is several years ago / -- ] it is not alike -- disagreeable 8s ぱ似ている ?-- obtaining -- ~ ん -- (although the robot did not have an appearance lever) -- at least -- "near future って which manages the cyber- network which connects the world and "which there is island" and receives the attack out of a network" is the same.
is it neta って事 of a grade which anyone invents?
although this game introduction-document-got the plot, came out, and it escaped from Euler, and a certain famous man is involved after that, or it is what, a shadow and katachi of a plot were lost and it was incidentally produced commercially -- me -- ゃ現在 -- also resulting -- it did not play

2004/07/08 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by Miz and Joe Provider: 4664 Host:4619 Browser: 4483
Although OP and ED are wonderful (he likes especially SO DIVE!), this important editing has lost the charm of a song in them.
OP music -- hearing it, thinking, "this is expectable!" and having begun to see -- what -- じゃこりゃ -- touch shobo さ of CG becomes [ you 仰っています ] sad too.
although considering image technology of those days (と -- it not being an old work so much even if it says) it is what is already likely to become somehow just for a moment -- especially -- past [ of a battle scene / motion wrong ] Can't it move more smoothly?
I wanted the twist at kyara which a hero side and enemy side also often has.
Although it also thought that a setup that the accident which occurred within the computer also affects the real world was interesting, and could have a role of an alarm bell of a certain kind depending on how to show, when saying about this animation, that regretted very much that only an unreasonable impression was merely received.
as individual evaluation -- a theme song ...
the volume on "very good" book ...
if it is between "being very bad", saying "it is bad" and deducts and carries out -- ", although it is usually likely to become " Since thought it wrong that a theme song made it "common" evaluation only by the reason for having been good, and he has given evaluation of a disrepute system above all and also it hits impolite to a work, suppose "It is bad."

2004/05/18 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by レインボー猫 Provider: 40569 Host:40530 Browser: 4960
文句言 -- without moving from its seat -- after all -- up to the last round -- seeing -- a better seed robo which CG shows as the last round or opening although hebo past て and crying enter and which was illustrated ordinarily was quite smart, and action was also clear.
A situation is not carried out, although the talk itself burns considerably, it is made and the point is very good.
hebo CG of a battle scene is spoiling all good points.
the point to say -- in any way -- like this -- being also alike .
as for this problem, was painful truly -- the last of the last round -- illustrating -- it was going to decorate "last beauty" with action -- し it carried out and CG was throwing away in "daigandaa" in the subsequent TAKARA toy work probably, evaluation was completely high, when making all illustrating -- if it carries out and carries out by accident -- a sequel -- the very regrettable work made to regard it as ....
by the way, that toy -- did it sell?
If it considers that "daigandaa" came out, although mind which sold as it is will also be carried out ...

2004/04/13 Good [Original Japanese review]
by 銭丸 Provider: 21444 Host:21314 Browser: 3875
the voice actor -- the favorite one -- many -- participating -- てい -- ぐ- The song highest!!
illustrating -- the so so (part -- past [ a jar thrust /!!
]) robot worst (it is not with a picture) A robot's kyara & boy kyara highest!
since it is scenario so so ?
-- comprehensive evaluation -- such もん illustrating in which I also wanted the robot to have done one's best and to illustrate -- the gap was in the robot and CG robot too much the CG robot -- へっぽこ -- elapsing -- repeatedly -- on the way -- it comes out and has become sleepy

Next / Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.