2006/05/30 Very Bad(-2 pnt) [Edit/Delete/Suggest to delete/Show only this review or post sympathy comment/] by Carlos Ross (Skip) Review history[Good:80(52%) Normal:18(12%) Bad:55(36%)] / Provider: 3396 Host:3329 Browser: 6326 I really dislike shows like this, and Final Approach makes absolutely no argument as to what it is: a harem show with lots of physical-based "romantic comedy" that is often neither particularly romantic nor particularly funny. The animation is often quite simplistic (and patently bad), the girls are distressingly vapid, and the main girl, Shizuka, is a bizarre blend of "psycho stalker" and "Stepford Wife". Even the fanservice is reduced to superdeformed nudity, which is appealing and bizarre unto itself. There are a few points at which this show attempts to inject some sort of social conscience, but these are largely futile (particularly the subplot involving Emiho's arranged marriage). This show fails to enhance, challenge, or flout the genre, and therefore, I can't recommend it less.2005/06/14 Good(+1 pnt) [Edit/Delete/Suggest to delete/Show only this review or post sympathy comment/] by TAKARAYA (Skip) Review history[Good:78(58%) Normal:57(42%) Bad:0(0%)] / Provider: 20117 Host:19936 Browser: 3646 This animated cartoon is noisy Love comedy. I laughed because the first episode of this animated cartoon was very interesting. But this animation sometimes became gloomy story deployment. It was a little regrettable. However, I think that this animated cartoon is a comparatively good animated cartoon. I do not dislike such animated cartoon.Post to this review list
Post your evaluation or comment.Difference of evaluation and comment
Comment
You can post as many times as you wish but other people have to post twice before you post again. And if you want to post negative comment, you need 20 posts before you post again.
Evaluation
You can post evaluation just once and it affects the evaluation points of the work. If it is not your final evaluation, it is better for you to write this is temporary evaluation.
Password (Required. more than 4 characters) [If you want to create secure password: Online mkpasswd service]
Your review or comment for this work(Required/Please write politely)
[Comment(?)] Comment by the person who thinks this is good Comment by the person who thinks this is normal Comment by the person who thinks this is bad
Pleaase confirm that your post is satisfing the following rules
Rule for review
Please evaluate the content of the work. Don't evaluate the creaters' personality or other reviews.
Don't post again as you are not the same person.
Please write politely.
Don't write meaningless comment.
Please write comment which relates to the title
If you don't follow the rule, the post will be removead and you may get penalty.
List of reason of accepting suggestion of removal
Critics of other person's opiniion
Critics of other people's opinion
Copy of the other people's reviews
Review which can be copied and pasted to every works
There is the problem about the user's name.
Race discrimination
Order
Too rough words
Criticizing creators due to the point which is not related to the creating capacity
Adult words
Multiple evaluations
Troll
Not appropriate evaluation considering the message
The review is not focusing on the title which the reviewer reviewed.
Evaluation without playing or seeing the title
Wrote the answer of the mystery
Not true description which you have to explain with information's source
Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the above rule.