Table

Hell Girl Mitsuganae (Jigoku Shojo Mitsuganae)(Anime)

Reviews' statics

Anime rank	Rank 2,048/in 2,758 titles (Total 0.00)	Rank 2,047 <= => Rank 2,049
Anime rank of 2008	Rank 77/in 128 titles	Rank 76 <= => Rank 78

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Image gallery

Information about this title

Tokyo Metropolitan Television Broadcasting Corp. MBS(Mainichi Broadcasting System) TVQ KYUSHU BROADCASTING CO.,LTD Chubu-Nippon Broadcasting Co.,Ltd. ANIMAX Broadcast Japan BIGLOBE stream
Hiroshi Watanabe
Ken'ichi Kanemaki
Takahiro Omori
Yasuharu Takanashi
Studio Deen
Nana Kitade
Hitomi Mieno Mamiko Noto
Masaya Matsukaze Takako Honda
Takayuki Sugo Kanako Sakai Hekiru Shiina YOU

[Detail]

Aki Toyosaki Hideo Ishikawa Yasuyuki Kase
Asami Imai Ayahi Takagaki
Souichirou Hoshi Hiroki Takahashi
Kobayashi Sanae Sayuri Yahagi

Released:2008/10/04 in Japan

Official sites
1. http://www.jigokushoujo.com/ (Translation)
2. http://www.mxtv.co.jp/jigoku3ganae/ (Translation)
3. http://anime.biglobe.ne.jp/jigoku/ (Translation)

Opening movie
1. http://jp.youtube.com/watch?v=d9_x_Gr-opQ

Ending movie
1. http://jp.youtube.com/watch?v=dnDfRP4s9iI

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	AnimeRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Good(0.00)	2,048	47.33	0.00

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	2,902	6	5
Outside Japan	142	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

0.0%

40.0%

20.0%

40.0%

0.0%

Added percentage

40%

60%

100%

Summary

40%

20.0%

40%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15
9 3 1 2 1 0 1 0 1

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/11/16 Comment(normal) [Original Japanese review]
by 海月さん Provider: 30269 Host:30458 Browser: 7505
A little more comical than the conventional series.
Does a grudge [ 志向 / comparatively with reality ] obtain by neta, and is it blamed there?
a misapprehension -- killing -- the doctor after death -- the touch which there is and cannot save the talk [-like ] -- good [ much ] Only by a hell girl merely coming out to judgment truly, for the moment, the necessity for an intermediary girl is not seen, it feels a question rather that the name of hell girl series is entitled at any rate as a short story, and it has not dropped off, either.
Being [ the hell girls as a city tradition / 3 鼎 ] kana.

2008/11/02 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by Naooki Provider: 4752 Host:4656 Browser: 8090
Although the baka fellow was thought about the 1st talk from the contents of unjust resentment-in character with a junior high school student, since the teacher was a good person, having been dropped on hell was 可〓hi〓
Two talks are the older beauties.
The junior high school student who fell in love with the someone else's wife is DV.
Although it turns out that he wants to make it hell sending of ..
in order to protect from the master who is doing, after all, he was likely to want to feel it in the bride as love, and I thought that there was no もんじゃあ which carries out interruption to others' husband and wife.
(a someone else's wife does not have 手出す気 privately -- although it comes out and becomes empty) although three talks understand that たい ijimerarekko wants to retaliate [ idol singer ] a ijime てた top idol singer in itself, even if honest looks are with 置い, they can be considered to be wax with it being good to a singer by that singing ability -- I thought ..
four talks of carrying out the last あぁいう treatment to aniki which ijimerarekko helped are incomprehensible -- it is -- it was .
For Mr.
婆 and the girl of まぁあ, five talks are unavoidable kana even if sent to hell.
(I thought .., although only the girl was sent in fact [ まぁ ], and Mr.
婆 should just also have sent to hell) Although merely (sweat) considered from before, a setup of a hell girl is sorry about he not having countervalue payment う to invigoration, either, even if it sees off a revenge partner in hell, it being sufficient 8 from hell 行く, if he will die in the future even if it revenges itself with much trouble, and not getting used to touch.
(Sweat) I think that the uncanny touch like this work may come out of an after theme song (まぁけど it will be [ けど ] a hell girl's taste ...).
Although I will think that まぁ観て is also seen only when having occurred and I will already evaluate, it is bad [ near a normal / "bad" ].

2008/11/01 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by Onitama Provider: 38670 Host:38685 Browser: 2230
An original does not know.
It saw to four talks.
The previous work carried out several-stories viewing and listening.
It is the work with which the bullying scene was too painful with the work and stopped viewing and listening.
Although a picture is unusually beautiful, the contents are painful as usual.
It saves compared with the previous work which had requested by unjust resentment this time and had a reason for having become brave, and there is no appearance.
Moreover, punishment is sekoi.
Isn't slightly the hell sending decision after death too high now?
But since it is taken to 即地獄, the blamed partner is appropriate thing kana.
a client becomes what after that -- although he wants to know in detail only a few which will be blown -- being such -- rubbing -- しょう It is a repetition of the same thing, and since it hangs on 面白味 further, viewing and listening is cut each time each time.
Although it is evaluation, suppose that it is bad.

2008/10/31 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by ダーク耽美系 Provider: 27214 Host:27322 Browser: 8090
about [ having still started ] and 4 talk view -- the pattern talk like an example that the contents of a story which it had in having returned as if there is nothing and what did not have the Yama あい which is the miscellaneous impressions so far, and which should carry out duty abandonment first, should be released from fate, and must have been dropped on hell a feeling of a physical disorder in evaluation since it was merely け are more as usual -- a few -- do change owner る [ ?
]?
It expects, and since it saw, a sense of exhaustion ^^; ...
The necessity of the end of the trouble as which how of whether it is what cannot harness the Yama あい as a main character of the talk to a slight degree, and the guest character as which how is sufficient is sufficient, or conflict of carrying out grudge fine and spending two-period-of-treatment no less than 26 talks on a story is not felt.
Carrying out several-stories 作ってお茶濁 of the talk in which the Yama あい carries out a main appearance like the 1st series or the 2nd series in the last neighborhood, an end is rejection in the end etc.
if it is this safe style well, it comes out, and it is peevish and can broadcast in the time zone which does not need to be especially done by animation at midnight and when the child has got up in comfort however, a series pile -- every る -- the bottom of a tension -- る's is worrisome

2008/10/18 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Natsume Provider: 24938 Host:24751 Browser: 4317
I feel that the reason which is not understands this work in midnight.
It is really fearful, if it says clearly and this is done in midnight.
Now, although it is the 3rd series, it can laugh at あい rather than a front.
the appearance of a bee -- carrying out -- "Boone" Is an appearance scene smart as usual?
I think that the front of OP was good.
The direction of ED is among inside.
Although it is called this and there is no bad place, it is not necessarily extraordinarily interesting.
It is thought that the direction of front series was powerful.
Evaluation is "good."

2008/10/07 Good [Original Japanese review]
by 怪盗乱馬 Provider: 32099 Host:31924 Browser: 2907(Mobile)
a term eye -- being boring -- on the way -- it tried to come out and stopped, and when seeing no second term and seeing it after a long time, it was rather interesting Although there was a place which feels a scenario for a question, the place where a hell girl is born, and that production were good, and the seeing [ at once ]-by しん (music stopping) place was powerful, and came with gusatt.
Such impact is required too.
Production and the cut are also collected, and it is [ tempo ] and is legible.

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.