Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews
Others
Site map

Search / Outside DB:

Anime ranking: Rank 2,333/in 2,678 titles (Total -3.99/Deviation 46.83) Rank 2,332 <= => Rank 2,334
Anime average points ranking: Rank 1,150/in 1,390 titles (Average -0.19(Good)/Deviation 40.49) Rank 1,149 <= => Rank 1,151 (more than 10 evaluatoin)
Anime ranking of 2007: Rank 126/in 159 titles Rank 125 <= => Rank 127

Majintantei nougami neuro(Anime)


[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]


Other media
Comics:Nougami Neuro
All
Reviews(Post)
ForumImages
Information about this title

Yusei Matsui SHUEISHA Weekly Boys Jump
Studio LIVE
MADHOUSE
Takehito Koyasu Kana Ueda Hiroyuki Yoshino Kouji Yusa Kosuke Toriumi Kikuko Inoue Shouzo Iiduka
Susumu Chiba Tadahisa Saizen Romi Park Anri Katsu
Shiho Kawaragi Naoko Matsui

Released:2007 in Japan
Official sites
1. http://www.ntv.co.jp/neuro/ (Translation)
Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)
 AverageAnimeRankDeviation(Total)Evaluation points(Total)Best of the Best
Inside JapanGood(-0.19)2,33346.83-3.99 

Statics of activity

Total ViewsCommentEvaluation
Inside Japan15,8192321
Outside Japan16000

How others evaluated in Japan

BestVery GoodGoodNormalBadVery BadWorst
People1353414
Percentage4.8%14.3%23.8%14.3%19.0%4.8%19.0%
Added percentage4.8%19.1%42.9%57.2%76.2%81%100%
Summary42.9%14.3%42.8%
                                                                                                 

Views for recent 8 days
Total2019181716151413
3
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0

LanguageSorted by dateSorted by recommendation New!
EnglishGood
(Only Evaluation)
Normal
(Only Evaluation)
Bad
(Only Evaluation)
All
(Only Evaluation)
None
JapaneseGood
(Only Evaluation)
Normal
(Only Evaluation)
Bad
(Only Evaluation)
All
(Only Evaluation)
None
This reputation board


Post your review / Top page
Other media
Comics:Nougami Neuro

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/07/04 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by Surasshu Provider: 8180 Host:8195 Browser: 5234
about the middle stage -- from -- it viewed and listened As animation, it is the result of there there.
Illustrating is good.
The voice actor was also magnificence including Mr.
Koyasu or Mr.
Ueda.
A place [ as a detective work, it is delicate well ].

2008/07/04 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by 懐中時計 Provider: 18820 Host:18846 Browser: 6342

[Good point]
Although bad -OP music
[point]
and original episode
[comprehensive evaluation]
neuro were fairly favorite comics, when it became the animation version, its original episode was too boring and it did not have a method.
It is at least in the time of nesshii that it was an only 見れる level.
from a witch tradition up to the last round -- going down -- aftertaste was not good at a sense-of-incongruity full load Although that can be seen by that.
し [ the criminal who killed some fathers of 弥子 was also fabricated for the animation versions ].
I think that OP music is really good music.

2008/06/26 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by Zabin Provider: 18203 Host:18155 Browser: 8090

[Good point]
- picture is fairly beautiful.
- Although it thought that it did not suit at first, the voice of neuro is good when getting used.

[Bad point]
The voice of - 弥子 and action are kyapikyapi past て違和感.
(The original has settled down more) - Higuchi also feels sense of incongruity for voice.
(reverse -- here -- settling down -- passing -- 声低 -- elapsing) the scene of the gag of - original does not almost have an appearance lever (It is ...
although this is the interesting place of neuro) - it does not regard -- an original story is not interesting as it says - The words of neuro and 弥子 and action are one-track.
- That touch of an original that was out of order does not have not-good 出てい.
- although voice suits and it excels the moment edited by HAL -- that scene of "without he forgets" It is different in what...; way of speaking is fearful.

[Comprehensive evaluation]
Whenever it sees, it becomes less interesting [ ...
], although I was looking forward to it very when it heard that it is animation-ized.

2008/06/13 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Pachimon Provider: 23337 Host:23009 Browser: 9733

[Evaluation]
It was boring, even if it was looking, probably because there was much episode of the animation version.
neuro of the animation version was not interesting only to an original fan, and it was honest gakkari.
Now, I consider that it was better not to animation-ize.

2008/06/12 Best! [Original Japanese review]
by 海穂 Provider: 45531 Host:45536 Browser: 9300

[Good point]
Individuality of a character!
They are do S evil spirit other people and banzai!

[Bad point]
Or [ that there is also a person weak considerably since there is unpleasant depiction which changes to a form with a criminal's strange face ] ....

[Comprehensive evaluation]
neuro favorite !

2008/06/10 Good [Original Japanese review]
by OD Provider: 38670 Host:38708 Browser: 4926
Since it was a delay office, it saw to the half.
Like other works, although the method using himo, such as a rope, etc.
is conspicuous, as for the means of the homicide of this work and a criminal, it is painful very to leave a body unattended after that.
It is the mutilation murder case of head dropping ますし and a modern line in a beautician's talk etc.
Become a mystery and comparatively which is called a mystery there is also no trick.
Can nutrition sufficient in such a mystery be taken truly?
I think that there is many more difficult "mysteries" in a world.
Next, it is if neuro pulls [ heroine ] the wires about this and a criminal is usually revealed and said, although a hero guesses by carrying out investigation and imagination this way and that, although it is inference.
It is the form of reverse Conan.
There are no signs that the neuro itself is guessing although it is satisfactory to itself, and it soothes, and although only それっぽい's is a scene using a げな tool called 777 tools, it cannot obtain not at all.
If a criminal is called perception by the smell, although it will be what till then ...
It is a work unique as a detective thing well.
I think that music and the cast may suit very much.
There is also no picture so bad.
Although it will think that it is various and whether dissatisfaction also comes out if the original is known, the direction which is not known considers that it can be tried to be satisfied of the direction.
One incident of deployment [ a story and ] has settled in one to 2 talk, and if it considers severe [ of the latest Conan ], they can be appreciated without stress.
Individually, "criminal of inference is you at any rate!
Since it ends by ", it is felt as enriching [ the subsequent meal time ] kana.
Still, although remained by the half, suppose that expectation may be put.

2008/06/01 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by Shooto Provider: 26688 Host:26721 Browser: 7365
Is do S っぷり of neuro good?
To it, the body was real.
neuro came back and the last round felt relieved.
Individually, the music of opening was good.
Also after and insertion music.
I think that it is an interesting talk with it being synthetic.
We surely recommend you.

2008/04/17 Good [Original Japanese review]
by KODOKU Provider: 12010 Host:12222 Browser: 7590
A guest voice actor's casting can be considered to be intentionally (smile).
Mr.
Akio Otsuka is appointed in the first talk.
Is possibly that omaaju or something in Ms.
Yoshiko Fujita's time etc.?
If it is as amusement animation but to be sure poor too much as inference animation, it is 愉しめ better た.
The time of HAL was a sequel thing uniquely and its drama nature was strong.
The breast became painful at the sad end.

2008/04/01 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by Provider: 7019 Host:7138 Browser: 4184

[Good point]
まぁ and neuro are although I was allowed to enjoy myself since it was comics favorite from the first ...

[Bad point]
Wasn't it the prospective voice?
まぁ -- although it has already got used as [ be / better / it / not to put in the original talk ]
[Comprehensive evaluation]
very bad -- coming out -- 。
2008/03/15 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by Reddoheringu Provider: 36284 Host:36193 Browser: 3874

[Good point]
A face when a criminal is cornered has impact and was pleased.
with all of you -- also coming -- saying ..
me -- strange "solitary hikari" of after and ending -- めっちゃ -- favorite *
[a bad point]
-- the intention of saying bad independently -- or -- although it is unavoidable ...
whose voice of neuro was low and was shocking beyond anticipation --
[comprehensive evaluation]
-- also synthetically, he fairly likes I carry out [ mind as it is dear ] 弥子 from an original.
X is smart all the time (萌).

2008/02/23 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by 闇夜のフェンリル Provider: 9605 Host:9444 Browser: 6386
The dullness of the animation original talk is unusual.
Rather cumbersome, not to mention it becomes advertisement of comics.
For neuro, comics are No.
1 too.

2008/02/22 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Naooki Provider: 26218 Host:26368 Browser: 8090
Although he did not like the comics, and seen to four talks for the time being, when the criminal understood, by maji, he wanted he to have been unpleasant at becoming a ghost face たり, and to see, and died.
a まぁ theme song and the voice actor -- ら -- it is about [ good ]
2008/02/12 Good [Original Japanese review]
by だるま落とし Provider: 2444 Host:2428 Browser: 3876
since I am one of the favorite comics while this jumps, although I am looking (flying off and coming out), I am rather good -- it can do -- it was .
Does he like OP first?
The music of such hard touch suits this animation very much.
Of course, he also bought CD.
Merely modulating with a melodrama and rust cannot but twist a head.
Although it is next illustrating, I can take out the air of a neuro no one but, and think that it is very good.
Although a story may also be regarded as "Whether a trick is possible on this actual target" as a very much interesting striped ぁ探偵 thing, since it is a setup [ 感覚 / newly ] called evil spirit people, he feels inclined to think that it will see leniently.
Is HAL currently done now [ mist beam ] in inside the most interesting?
Charm was felt for the place called confrontation with a computer program.
Was merely Detective 匪口's stick reading worrisome?
This is severe although others were not so much worried.
it says very or filled with the heart -- it says, and he says or has such a feeling since it gave the good impression on the whole, evaluation is good -- coming out
2007/12/27 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by konakonako Provider: 6512 Host:6462 Browser: 5292
Animation was seen and it fitted into the original.
I am sorry although the comment surely has a form in comparison with an original.
[Good point] I think that a character design is good.
An original corrects well that the sketch of a human body, especially a face is considerably out of order, and, and yet, I think so much that the image is molded without changing.
(neuro likes original one individually) When the point of turning the incident of yako behind again, and the point which serves as a detective from the beginning were seen from the body which does not know an original, it is easy to enter and was good.
[Bad point] While seeing only animation, the eye has surely said the impossibility of inference, the childishness of a trick, and familiar badness [ a setup ].
An original is read, and although it understood that it was the work which maintains balance with the peculiar view of the world, since the portion is not harnessed so much if it is animation, only demerit is conspicuous.
There are also 数話見て and めてしまう people.
Moreover, although neuro and each yako think that there is a place which gets interested in "man's possibility" as an important point of fun as they grow, it is cut fairly carelessly.
It was regrettable that expected neuro in 13 talks and the expected exchange of sai were especially deleted considerably.
Although it thinks for the first time that it is an interesting work involving this theme, isn't there any schedule which it has in such a direction?
It is uneasy in of what talk it is really a flow.
[Comprehensive evaluation] Although it becomes the evaluation in comparison with the original, the atmosphere of a work thinks that it is being able to do by being transmitted so much and twisting harder [ as which the good portion is seldom emphasized ].
Although it may be extravagant, in order to tell an original peculiar atmosphere, I think that it devised much more, and I made and wanted you to be crowded.
At present, although still looked to touch called an appetizer, before entering mainly, a program is likely to finish with this.
It sees [ to eye favor ] in evaluation of an animation simple substance and is common although it thinks that it was good since the original was found thanks to animation.

2007/11/28 Comment(normal) [Original Japanese review]
by Takoyaki Provider: 10711 Host:10426 Browser: 6342
Animation neuro has an original severe talk and the original talk feels it good.
However, it is also going to make the talk of the original into one talk by force, and it becomes amusing in many cases.
The talk of a hysterics terrier is the example which it was going to make it one talk by force, and went wrong.
For those who are by original 読ん, the portions of why or a punch line were deteriorated also in X more talk, the original is changed, it thinks that it is unpleasant or animation neuro lapses into the shortage of explanation in many cases at those who are not by original 読ん.
But since Mr.
Aya's talk was divided into the volume on order and done as the original, it was good.

2007/11/17 Good [Original Japanese review]
by 陣兵 Provider: 18696 Host:18447 Browser: 3875
[Good point] Comics are animation although looked -- [A bad point] Animation -- [Comprehensive evaluation] Comics are seen in the jump every week.
Although comics are also collected, the area of … っていう which still looked at animation and which is not things, and me is not broadcast.
"kureimoa" will finish around January, next year or February.
It is thought from after that that it is a broadcast start.
- seen early -- it is -- 。
2007/11/16 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by RURURU Provider: 11703 Host:11953 Browser: 3875
[a good point] -- the voice actor -- 達 -- saying -- it is .
It is almost the same as Drama CD, and carries out the bottom ...
[Bad point] The original of the first direction is quite a shock ...
a criminal's ill luck -- strange touch will be lacking at all and a criminal and a trick will be known in 1 or 2 minutes of the beginning Since the talk that sai appears was also completely different, the last lacked in 面白み.
Although it continued seeing somehow until now, would it already serve ...
[Comprehensive evaluation] Useless.
.
.
He likes the drama CD positively.

2007/10/29 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by TCC Provider: 30800 Host:30573 Browser: 4184
Although it seems that this work was also animation-ized at last ..........
[A good point] - Good acting of the members of a main voice actor although it is Mr.
Takehito Koyasu who was able to play the leading role also in the work of Mr.
Matsui's teacher -- the character of neuro, and the place (as the likes and dislikes to it being another) which looks down on especially human being -- I think that it is often expressed the figure which usually is bright and Ms.
Kana Ueda of 弥子役 has also served, and the figure absorbed in the dark past -- I think that different characters are often played [A bad point] - Only for unusual persons, a criminal is.
Kana which was the talk of the murder case in the footbridge of a crowd.
the leader of communities, and the back phon or feeling of 姫宮 are not known -- also coming out -- himself who came parents' authority to the bamboo hat although there was nothing -- sympathy was seldom completed as the selfish daughter A criminal is a lunatic also with the simple talk of the variety show live, and catharsis was seldom felt.
In short, charm is seldom felt.
[Comprehensive evaluation] Although it is also being able to say an original well, it is the style which chooses people.
Although there is also a good place, invigoration is seldom felt.
There is no intensity in the original itself from the first, and, at present, evaluation is "bad."
2007/10/18 Comment(normal) [Original Japanese review]
by Takoyaki Provider: 37389 Host:37178 Browser: 8569
There is no ぶっちゃ injury たり of the comment criminal of two to 3 talk of animation original.
What may be more poisonous.
し [ there is also no small neta which suited the original ].
I think that three talks are unclear for those who are not original 見て when kyaiin puts in the original talk why in two to ?3 talk which will be voice actor 8 てたん here, although it was the sudden change once appropriate for an original.
I think it dependent on the composition of the next talk what this work becomes.
It gives without carrying out, and the alteration through which it does not pass any more since it asks is 。.

Next / Post your review / Top page
Other media
Comics:Nougami Neuro

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.
Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.



Please give your evaluation or comment.

You need two other people's comment to post your comment again after you post your evaluation or comment.
Other media
Comics:Nougami Neuro

Your Name(Required)
Password (Required. more than 4 characters)
Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.
Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.


Top page of DB | Site map | Copyright(c) 1999- 1st Class All rights reserved