Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Anime ranking: Rank 305/in 2,707 titles (Total 62.90/Deviation 54.66) Rank 304 <= => Rank 306
Anime average points ranking: Rank 130/in 1,450 titles (Average 1.85(Very good)/Deviation 61.80) Rank 129 <= => Rank 131 (more than 10 evaluatoin)
Anime ranking of 1991: Rank 6/in 38 titles Rank 5 <= => Rank 7

Mermaid Forest(Anime)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

Other media
Comics:Mermaid's Woods

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Goods
(DVD)

Latest DVD: 2006/08/08 ():

Mermaid Forest $98

DVD(6hit) Sales/Latest						VHS(2hit) Sales/Latest		Books(4hit) Sales/Latest	Toys(1hit) Sales/Latest
Rank:34755 Mermaid Forest - Bitter Flesh (Vol. 2) Tag:$98 2005/09/20 () Eval.:***** 1.Mermaid Forest- Bitter Flesh vol. 2.	Rank:36172 Mermaid Forest Tag:$98 2006/08/08 () Eval.:***** 1.Mermaid Forest = okay series.	Rank:63293 Mermaid Forest - Unending Nightmare (Vol. 4) Tag:$98 2006/01/03 () Eval.:***** 1.Liked the series but a little dissapointed.	Rank:63417 Mermaid Forest - Unquenchable Thirst (Vol. 3) Tag:$98 2005/11/15 () Eval.:***** 1.Great Series	Rank:63938 Mermaid Forest - Quest for Death (Vol. 1) Tag:$98 2005/07/05 () Eval.:***** 1.A Takahashi Whim...	Rank:90181 Mermaid Forest - Quest for Death (Vol. 1) + Series Box Tag:$98 2005/07/05 () Eval.:***** 1.A Takahashi Whim...	Rank:60837 VHS Tape:Rumik World: Mermaid Forest Tag:$99 1993/11/01 () Eval.:***** 1."A gruesome tale of the supernatural!" - as if	Rank:68182 VHS Tape:Rumik World: Mermaid Forest Tag:$99 1996/09/03 () Eval.:***** 1."A gruesome tale of the supernatural!" - as if	Rank:1323501 Paperback:Mermaid Forest, Volume 1 (Viz Graphic Novel) Tag:$95 1994/11 () Eval.:***** 1.Now being released in Japan as a full anime series	Toy:Child Toddler Girl Butterfly Fairy Pixie Costume Wings

Information about this title

Rumiko Takahashi Azumajyunichi
Yasuo Urakami
TMS Entertainment Katomichiaki
Koichi Yamadera Minami Takayama
Roko Takizawa Yukari Honma Houko Kuwashima Ai Orikasa

Released:1991/08 in Japan

Image gallery sites
1. Rumiko Takahashi's Mermaid Saga

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	AnimeRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Very good(1.85)	305	54.66	62.90

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	21,046	54	34
Outside Japan	510	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

32.4%

38.2%

14.7%

11.8%

2.9%

0.0%

Added percentage

32.4%

70.6%

85.3%

97.1%

100%

Summary

85.3%

11.8%

2.9%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 6 5 4 3 2 1 30 29
6 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 0

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

Other media
Comics:Mermaid's Woods

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/05/04 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by Sennuki Provider: 38066 Host:38222 Browser: 4203
It is evaluation of only the old OVA version.
About Mr.
Rumiko Takahashi's work, although it is me, an anti animation-ized group (らんま not good, めぞん comparison-mashi, 星げっそり in which it deals), old OVA mermaid series and the Rumiko Takahashi theater can be protected comparatively.
Compared with らん Maya うる星, I feel that an excessive arrangement and the excessive addition of the characters of a mystery, and excessive 〓t〓are stopped as much as possible for mermaid series or the Rumiko Takahashi theater.
Mermaid series and the Rumiko Takahashi theater can comparatively recommend also to comics groups under those circumstances.
Since the atmosphere of original comics is broken too much.
The liver of this work is the last scene.
Although "that man" of this animation version is drawn on the last somewhat smartly although it has sadness by it in "that man" who did nothing unlike this animation version of the comics version, and just mind [ pass ] is carried out, this is this if it becomes help for that woman and its man.
Performance of the voice actor is also stable.
especially -- the leading role, Mr.
Hirokazu Yamadera, and Takayama -- everybody -- みさん is good Mr.
Hirokazu Yamadera who incidentally played one of the heroes of this work and Mr.
湧太 of 旅烏 was playing Mr.
right 牙 of 旅烏 also for the らんま TV animation version.

2006/04/13 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by ヤンマ本史 Provider: 49951 Host:50069 Browser: 5234
He remembers having seen the OVA version and having been shocked.
There is charmingness and it has stared also at ちて.
The TV version was also seen.
Although it was interesting, the atmosphere which OVA has fades and was regrettable.
The pattern also had sense of incongruity just for a moment.
But since it thinks that the contents are wonderful, it is very good !.

2006/03/03 Good [Original Japanese review]
by 美兎 Provider: 36309 Host:36097 Browser: 6287
Writing may be the first time in one year ^^; -- It is comprehensive evaluation of the television version "a mermaid's woods." Mr.
Rumiko Takahashi's mermaid series became television animation.
"The mermaid's wound" in which it does not broadcast is recorded only on all 11 talks and DVD that television televising was carried out.
illustrating -- although it is the animation version with which collapse was conspicuous, I think that the point currently faithfully drawn to an original is good television -- it seems that consideration is looked at a little by production probably because 放映, and a little cruelty is mitigated The theme of a work is "eternal." or [ that it can be said that the man who gained sure enough "it is eternal" is happy although people want a mermaid's meat in quest of "an eternal life" ] -- People who receive a mermaid's meat by chance and have become ageless ....
I let them pass and think that they are the meaning of living, and the work made to consider what death is.
Since I put emphasis on image beauty individually, evaluation is limited to "it is good."

2005/11/03 Good [Original Japanese review]
by 陸カジキ Provider: 12246 Host:12182 Browser: 4696
By having done at midnight which was ordinarily interesting, and recording on videotape and seeing, there was a voice actor who thinks is good rather exactly although it was collection-of-short-stories って touch from the better seed beginning to the last, and the talk was also worried.
Takahashi skillful, when ruble Yoshiko ってこうゆう物 is made to write -- it is -- it is -- 犬夜沙 -- such -- if a ゆう long piece-thing is made to write, although a power down will be carried out strangely -- or [ that it is unavoidable well ] --

2004/07/07 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by Koma Provider: 13566 Host:13406 Browser: 3646
Although animation also regards a picture as the result having been good by kirei, I like original one too.
Is the talk the highest?
He also likes kyara very.
But since I was looking at "らんま 1/2",; face and character which 湧太 will wear with 響良牙 (a voice actor is both Mr.
Yamadera) also completely differ from each other.
An original portion is cut, and the cause been [ the cause / it ] sufficient and carried out and animation is why compared with an original, or I am feeling that it is unsatisfactory for it.

2004/03/09 Best! [Original Japanese review]
by 蔦屋 Provider: 5201 Host:5029 Browser: 4487
About the face of 湧太 of the animation version and an original With the animation version, I think that the face by "age of 湧太 pushed aside more than original comics, and " was solid in it.
The countenance at the time immediately after 湧太 currently drawn on the first talk eats a mermaid's meat.
They are the features in which innocence probably still remains in the second half of teens, or the first half of the 20th generation.
Completely, the image as a boy has disappeared and the features at the time of his 120 generation of 湧太 in が and "舎利姫" understand it as valiant "youth" clearly.
And the present age, features of 500 generation.
Although it is a youthful face, I pile up 幾星霜 and think that the suffering which continued receiving the work of "non-death" serves as dignity, and is appearing in features vividly.
The point which should be noted here is a point that features are different and it is visible, though it is "eternal youth." Features are considerably different if even twins is [ a living environment ] different.
Its hat is just taken off to the skill of Mr.
Takahashi and the animation version work staff illustrated being conscious of it.
...
A very thing is written and it prays making a mistake in reading and not coming out.
(Sweat)

2004/03/08 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by 向井大輔 Provider: 35453 Host:35450 Browser: 5401
It is others [ have ] to consider that it is likely to say since it is Rumiko Takahashi.

2004/03/07 Best! [Original Japanese review]
by 水 Provider: 3475 Host:3336 Browser: 3875
Animation was interesting.
Comics do not know.
It is moved to tears.

2004/03/07 Good [Original Japanese review]
by 十人十色 Provider: 56029 Host:56059 Browser: 3874
It also helps that the acquaintance had criticized severely at the time (beginning) of an original announcement, and the original is not reading.
does it seem that the title at least -- is animation-ized in order of the announcement even in the 6th [ about ] talk?
There is memory which was surprised that the handling of "it is ageless" is different too much in the time "the account of 12 country" was broadcast exactly.
the time of thinking that he is shining most -- "-- time -- と -- although there is much experience (just like asking for the moon) which wished it as rare" or coaxed its energy and physical strength, if it thinks very, it will make to be unable to make the time the same with others into zott [ of a number of years or a front ] I saw happily, without being seldom Mr.
Takahashi's work conscious.
I want to also look over an original.
Even so, is Mr.
Shimamoto's performance uncanny (five talks, six talks)?
The cold thing ran to the back.

2004/01/24 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by 爆音 Provider: 4177 Host:3949 Browser: 4925
I carry out [ mind as original merit has seldom come out ] a version at midnight.
Since it is the Takahashi work well, although it sees once and cooks.

2004/01/22 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by 宝家義頼 Provider: 5504 Host:5350 Browser: 3646
Is Mr.
Takahashi's horror work seldom made into patt?
I think that the direction describing gag or a humanity thing is suitable.

2004/01/21 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by miyu Review history[Good:1(100%) Normal:0(0%) Bad:0(0%)] / Provider: 38585 Host:38430 Browser: 4925
He liked OP very!!
I think that atmosphere is suited.

2003/12/23 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by takudai Provider: 9864 Host:9887 Browser: 4483
Although it is the thing [ like ] in which opinions are variously divided, I will write the comment in the woods of the mermaid of animation here.
the last round -- it was impressed after a long time The scenes of the seedling's last have already been a tear and a tear.
I think that the voice of 湧太 had more youthful touch good for the I individual target the back.
(Since OVA is not seen, do you think so?)

2003/12/19 Comment(good) [Original Japanese review]
by nack Provider: 20974 Host:20843 Browser: 3875
& gt; Mr.
ぷ-Taro Mr.
> Edo Tokyo It is nack which was allowed to have proposed in the past.
since having proposed to the janitor has the state where the series of the criticism of a work will be subdivided simply, at that time, it should unify into any one or a bulletin board should newly be made as a work of a different thing -- と (you should advance subdivision), although proposed by saying The proposal was dismissed in the meaning [ side / janitor ] of "animation conformity" and "avoiding the hugeness of a site management burden, and complicatedness." I think that it is an unavoidable determination.
It is me to have proposed the "Rumiko Takahashi theater" bulletin board first, and to have made the janitor make it incidentally.
By the favor which I propose [ favor ] and has made the bulletin board make, I do an apology deeply about having confused many you.

2003/12/17 Comment(good) [Original Japanese review]
by ぷー太郎 Provider: 17186 Host:17140 Browser: 5978
It can say, and it can say and is reflecting on writing also here too much strongly.
I have you answer in good faith, without getting angry with my writing, and am very sorry.
Some people proposed the bulletin board in the Rumiko Takahashi theater mermaid's woods.
the information about a bulletin board -- I appreciate

2003/12/16 Comment(good) [Original Japanese review]
by 江戸東京 Provider: 32226 Host:32222 Browser: 3875
Thank you for a precious opinion in ぷ-Taro Mr.
>.
I apologize for carrying out an unpleasant thought deeply.
It seems that opinions are divided about this work.
Please write to the place which can think that the "Rumiko Takahashi theater", "a mermaid's woods", "a mermaid's wound", and itself are right.
It seems that this work is written where, or the problem is written to a bulletin board Mr.
[ janitor ], and he did not have you accept before although Mr.
nack proposed the request also including the addition in "the woods of the Rumiko Takahashi theater and a mermaid." Moreover, since this site is mostly not only animation but here and there which is writing the comment about an original, he has also done so.
I am very sorry like [ forced one's opinion on you and ].

2003/12/16 Comment(good) [Original Japanese review]
by ぷー太郎 Provider: 17186 Host:17140 Browser: 5978
To the person who entered from a mermaid's 傷でって and the animation version, it is unkind!
Since the titles of this site are animation / game DB, you should follow the situation of the animation version from an original (comic).
By the opinion of an I individual, a mermaid's wound was announced by OVA to the last, and should be independently considered to be this TV series.
Does the way which wrote comment rather in the direction of the Rumiko Takahashi theater say?
A strange partition is and is unpleasant if it sees after a long time.

2003/11/21 Comment(good) [Original Japanese review]
by 江戸東京 Provider: 18003 Host:17954 Browser: 1642
Evaluation of the talk after "the end of a dream" is described by the "wound of mermaid" side according to original conformity.
Please look at that.

2003/11/15 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by Michi Provider: 35031 Host:34965 Browser: 4928
Does the work which had not been book recorded come out still more?
し [ animation has also started ].
an original sequel is not drawn -- ちゃうな [ carry out thing kana ?
expectation and ] Although animation cannot obtain illustrating just for a moment.
(When H2 of Mr.
Mitsuru Adachi animation-izes, it is disappointed with a picture, and it is a shelf.) Since the mermaid whose voice actor was also stick reading with the far uncanny man of a role has not changed the voice actor, the point is good.
The rest fairly likes a novel.
Two volumes have come out in the super Qwest library.
金春 Tomoko Mr.
work.
something -- 湧太 -- the thing of a true fish -- from the bottom of its heart -- the prized feeling is a printing type and the taste different from comics may suit

Next / Post your review / Top page

Other media
Comics:Mermaid's Woods

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.