Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Anime ranking: Rank 2,635/in 2,684 titles (Total -43.20/Deviation 42.22) Rank 2,634 <= => Rank 2,636
Anime average points ranking: Rank 1,306/in 1,393 titles (Average -0.96(Bad)/Deviation 32.48) Rank 1,305 <= => Rank 1,307 (more than 10 evaluatoin)
Anime ranking of 2008: Rank 87/in 87 titles Rank 86 <=

Minamike Okawari(Anime)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

Other media
Anime:Minamike

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Information about this title

TV TOKYO Corporation TV Osaka TV Aichi Television Hokkaido Broadcasting Co.LTD. TVQ KYUSHU BROADCASTING CO.,LTD TV SETOUCHI BROADCASTING CO., LTD AT-X
Koharu Sakuraba Koudansha YOUNG MAGAZINE
Toshimichi Otsuki
Masashi Suzuki STUDIO EASTER Studio Rong SOUND BOX
STARCHILD RECORDS
TV-Tokyo Music Rina Satou Marina Inoue Minori Chihara Kaoru Okubo
Nana Mizuki Hiroyuki Yoshino Shintaro Asanuma
Rika Morinaga Eri Kitamura
Kakihara Tetuya Saori Goto Ao Takahashi Saeko Chiba
Reiko Takagi Ryoko Ono Daisuke Ono Miho Saiki

Released:2008/01/06 in Japan End:2008/03/31 in Japan

Official sites
1. http://www.tv-tokyo.co.jp/contents/minami-ke2/ (Translation)
2. http://www.starchild.co.jp/special/minami-ke/index.html (Translation)

Music sites
1. http://j-ken.com/category/animation/title/112936/

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	AnimeRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Bad(-0.96)	2,635	42.22	-43.20

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	26,650	62	45
Outside Japan	305	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

0.0%

8.9%

13.3%

8.9%

35.6%

8.9%

24.4%

Added percentage

8.9%

22.2%

31.1%

66.7%

75.6%

100%

Summary

22.2%

8.9%

68.9%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21
15 4 1 0 1 0 1 2 6

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation New!
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) All
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation New!
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	All

Post your review / Top page

Other media
Anime:Minamike

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/08/09 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by ロケット花火改 Provider: 42870 Host:42917 Browser: 8090
Although it will probably be [ of since it is the second work ] reasonable, compared with a riot, it is inferior too.
Nothing is said about character dithering or illustrating.
However, it was painful to have differed from an original atmosphere very much.
I think that the way of a term is based on the original.
The way of そりゃ and a riot comes out popular.
Fuyuki of the cage character exceeded next to it.
Didn't it independently take out?
There was not necessarily a place good for the way of 2 terms.
However, was character dithering sociable compared with a term?
Modern style.
It just said.
Compared with a term, it was acceptable easily.
moreover, the air of the whole story is also serious a little compared with a term -- tic -- it was -- since -- the direction of liking [ that one ] thinks ii Although it is only comparison with a term, if it sees here as a term, I will think that there are comment different again.

2008/08/09 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by Gurooru Provider: 18003 Host:17732 Browser: 2052
Is there any individuality?
By preliminary announcement Although it thought what becomes Up to here It is that it is interesting.

2008/07/27 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Uooria Provider: 4454 Host:4407 Browser: 5234
It is how by first contribution.
although various animation has been seen until now -- on the way -- having stopped trying to come out -- this "-- instead of -- " -- being the first .
a previous work -- comparing -- harmony -- breaking -- passing -- it is .
Illustrating can laugh at the part which drew the character lovelily, and the place at which it can laugh, twists them, and does not suit.
When it was a substitute that the part and loveliness using the safe picture, and fun suited harmony, you drew the character lovelily, and did the previous work sprout and did it say the route it?
He wanted to suspect and a work and a picture were not able to bear honto 見る by the mismatch indeed.
(others -- although he wants to write, since other people wrote, it is omitted) It is this ぞ改悪.
It is the work which must not be made however it may mistake.

2008/07/25 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by Yakkuru Provider: 26911 Host:27189 Browser: 4661
Since the result of 1 term was very good, although it saw ...
There is no not much good impression.
Atmosphere is too dark in whether it is going to reproduce the scene of winter first.
(Black painting also has mobu) Although it may be harnessed if it is serious deployment like the end of a shuffle, as a Minamike, it does not suit at all.
Character of kana.
Free useless man who is called the fellow who cannot hate in 1 term although it is phon tobaka and who feels, and is not air 読ま at 2 terms although it came out and was a very favorite character.
fuyuki of an original character.
The wonderful character which is not intently got blocked only with having been involved and is carried out.
The punch line of changing to another school, without changing anything after all although it was the character which was intent on being original and was taken out.

[comprehensive evaluation]
-- it is the animation which enjoys the slightly good talk and the talk at which it can laugh after reading the Minamike [ itself ] atmosphere -- considering -- I have you -- when the atmosphere was destroyed, it was merely merely tedious animation It is too late although atmosphere was set to the level which becomes close to 1 term and seems to be good at last in the last talk in the end.
evaluation of the final stage is regarded as plus and comprehensive evaluation is bad -- coming out -- 。

2008/07/07 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Surasshu Provider: 8357 Host:8505 Browser: 5234
Rather than a no-mark work, evaluation falls a little.
The point that illustrating has been changed too is painful.
It is not the reason that illustrating of this work is also dirty well.
A place [ the face is not drawn for the character in which an unpleasant point does not have a name, either on others ].
fuyuki って one made to appear in passing as a new character ...
OP and ED are also delicate.
Not Amazon but zamazon currently written to the box of the hamster kept with Chiaki's class are ukeたけどw.
or [ that the "good" neighborhood is appropriate to evaluation since a well fundamental place changes and does not have わい ]

2008/07/07 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by y.k Provider: 961 Host:877 Browser: 6342

[Good point]
Although it cannot be said as the passing mark the second half, I think that it improved as it is.
It is GJ that 〆 of the last round was experience value going up [ be / it ].
Good acting of the Inoue 麻里奈 of the role of a Nana, and Daisuke Ono of the role of Hosaka.

[Bad point]
Only the especially conspicuous point is mentioned.
First, the significance of existence of fuyuki.
Isn't it the character for which nobody is probably asking?
Next, illustrating.
Touch out of which boro comes just as it moves, although it was the picture which regards as patt and looks prettier than a Doumu (1 term).
I feel that it is attached to moving too much for asuriido (unnatural [ come out / move too much and / and ], direction opening walks).
an inside rate is also severe -- often .
And the alteration of a character.
Hysterics 起こ is carried out [ scent ] in spring, and it is sufficient and is [ a Nana becomes are character and ] sufficient for her (a Nana is child -- of aho KY with 2 terms, although it must originally be a mood maker).
It was like [ with a supervisor or a scenario doubtful in whether he understands the original ].

[Comprehensive evaluation]
I think that there were many points that the nerve of an original and 1 term fan was rubbed the wrong way.
Or [ it cannot but say that the neighborhood should follow a Doumu's example ] -- Evaluation is "bad" in consideration of having picked up to some extent in the second half.

2008/07/03 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Okyan Provider: 14047 Host:13896 Browser: 6399
Since the animation "a Minamike" of a previous work was very interesting, it expected, and it viewed and listened at the time of an all story and televising.
I think that the production of a picture as an image does its best considerably, and is elaborate compared with a previous work "a Minamike." However, the elaborate image thinks it the problem of this work that fun is not necessarily connected.
Although only an angle and expression with sufficient appearance are pursued visually and it is called "fun" and "laughter", timing is the impression which is neglected.
I think that it is different too in the fun as which the reader itself regards "the original picture" and original top rate of comics in between [ optimal ], and the fun shown as the motion to which no one but [ animation ] was fixed to - timing while it is time.
I think that a thing called the way and production different from the original to show is naturally needed.
Thinking "saw people are interesting", as a result of pursuing, although it is different should not change.
For example, to a comic story, fun completely changes with those who also perform the completely same program.
Where is the difference?
I think that the direction where such things were studied is known well.
Although the foundations for laughing with a sufficient feeling are in breathing (between), the timing of the gag of this work or the settlement of a comedy has an unnatural portion sensuously, and is not now connected with one fun.
Although it probably thinks that it is a terrible delicate place, I think that it would be good in being made by the timing and production of gag or a comedy using a warmer nerve from the production of a picture.
Since it had improved as animation, I think that the gag of this editing was the very regrettable result.
But it became comparatively interesting if applied to the second half - last talk.
If it continues to a slight degree, I will think that it would be better.
It is touch that it finished with the place which gag and the comedy got and became interesting.
The good point of this animation is the warm fish of a character.
It is looking and becomes a ほんわ kana feeling somehow.
Comment & regarded as "good" by saying; it is evaluation.

2008/06/19 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by 真行寺 Provider: 2436 Host:2486 Browser: 3023(Mobile)
It saw for the sequel of a Minamike.
Good reduction of the turn of the knowledge and Hosaka of a "point" and a next preliminary announcement Merit which does not change -op character sudden change [ of "a bad point" and the good point be / it / gentle / eldest daughter ] - the main talks are boring three sisters The hair of - Chiaki whom - new character does not need moves (irregular).
Regrettable, since the Minamike ゆる - Was, and instead of had become dark touch, although he liked deployment and bright touch.
I felt that a new character called Fuyuki had made the work dark further.
Since it was pleasant so so when makoto, Ishida, and Fujioka entered, evaluation is limited to "it is bad."

2008/06/17 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by kana=Clownlord Provider: 12867 Host:12635 Browser: 4184
It is the evaluation which follows a "Minamike." It is from two talks to have thought that it was inferior to the 1st period of treatment.
it got used immediately with whether although OP and ED had a part of sense of incongruity as a Minamike, he wanted to make them into different air from the 1st (rather than -- a Doumu) period of treatment (however, the experience value was better) if the contents are also original things, a pattern also attaches comparison, and is なきゃ and it says so -- an original -- an early eye -- 丸っ -- it was not deep touch -- the mind which was dark in the screen outside did not have a part of sense of incongruity with - It was also glad that the members of a voice actor which became a favorite completely by one period of treatment had not changed, either.
Of course, I was looking forward to 2 talks or subsequent ones.
っけ and ふゆき (Chinese character わかりま is not carried out) came by two talks the bottom.
how to use the person itself, although such character is not disagreeable -- a few -- different -- てい's (at least -- 幸薄 -- a person setup seems to be dear and, moreover, does not match well) -- what characters have gathered satisfactorily and a Minamike will moreover be first, or a homely Minamike -- ふゆ -- you -- the character of たいな touch has been put in The above mismatch overlaps.
Wasn't a televiewer's antipathy acquired?
and having heard unpopular rumor -- the middle stage to ふゆき省き -- the original talk -- doing (there having been an original element -- the pool has become indoors --) -- last 2 talk -- by the way -- ふゆき -- a hint -- transfer of a suddenly nothing What did Mr.
asuriido want to carry out?
Although the courage to supply an original character is incurred, since it is also unsavory to make it a not quite satisfactory character, to remove since it became disrepute, to make it a thing, however to leave as it is, it is made banishment.
...
Is it good at such a thing?
It sympathizes with ふゆき.
after self -- haruka -- the sudden change of character [ like ] Since kana was crying and examining itself also in the time of kana making haruka dashi and deluding chiaki with the original talk which is not done by animation, isn't there any じゃ laughed at which and allowed?
I hear that I hear that it had broken and kept silent about the thing, it shouted about at it, and hame was removed a little as the volunteer, and it is supper omission (both are animation original stories).
What was there really?
The already slightly mashi way of getting angry is adopted also by top shell ● ん.
Did Mr.
asuriido want to change with one period of treatment to the character of haruka?
I want you to roar out in the voice of Mr.
Sato (haruka) of that rate jasuto of a synchronization at least, and it is a method of なっ ...
It was a sigh also at the badness [ Hosaka ] of treatment.
however, this -- Mr.
Sakuraba and a Doumu -- ます with non-は the appearance of a few original -- 殆んど 1 -- if it is cool and does -- 2 -- it being cool and becoming an addition strap -- it is for sure It will be because only Kazuto Hosaka is conspicuous and it becomes a special province, if those to whom only that has impact are always taken out.
Actually, one-period-of-treatment four talks were completely Hosaka's things, although the performance was 1/3.
Even so, it is severe not to fill the two-period-of-treatment total performance time in no less than 15 minutes.
What was necessary was just to have made also from the novelette of the Hosaka main at least.
I think [ rather than ] that 4s ぽ are good, using an original character vainly.
It laughed, when the talk that original Hosaka appears did 1 話残ってた's well.
Since Hosaka of the 2nd period of treatment became a class of the feeling badness France style, he was good.
That the 1st period of treatment is otherwise structure of private outshining to the thing a passage and whose classroom are normals at the public high school (probably) たり (the original form is not stopped.) however, Hosaka -- it has returned to the main talks -- that the extra (trouble -- an intention since the role of namelessness (those with words) whose face thinks whether it is stinking and can be slightly seen by きや and thin black painting has also come out -- it is unknown) of black painting [ bodies / other than dress ] comes out たり -- etc.
-- as long as I felt, at least the number with which the kindergartener knows the good opinion appeared synthetic comment -- opening part gakkari (original talk and ふゆき which pass over the main causes popular every day) -- delicate (did "having been completely defeated by the Doumu" pass the theme song of the one period of treatment of the last too?) rather (the original talk -- it was much) in the middle stage, and the final stage It became glad that it was finally able to be heard by broadcast of television as me.
After all, since he liked the original, it carried out now [ all-story 見て striped ].
2 terms (" Minamike" and " Minamike - treatment of [ change and ] one period of treatment and two periods of treatment in -".) Why did it appear in action of changing all except a voice actor?
asuriido cannot allow, if it is a proposing agency although I want you to manufacture -- 2 -- cool -- this -- sube った et al.
-- being difficult .
If it manufactures, it will surely be a Doumu.
If it is asuriido, it records on videotape, and if reputation is good, it will see.
It expects, if it is other companies.
In the original, a new character comes out and yurui climax is shown daily increasingly.
I want to see once again them who are surely moving.
Evaluation Although it is disrepute in me, that the voice actor had not changed, the song's having been good, and an original are liked!
I think that the friendship to say and Hosaka want to consider as a
[normal]
based on having been unpleasant.
I want to devote oneself to Mr.
asuriido and to be given.
A Doumu also needs to do his best more!
If it can do, it will be about "Minamike 2 (Japanese syllabary)"!
although the "Minamike" was not so longer -- "-- instead of -- " -- comment -- long -- having become .
Read people, thank you.
Tiredness.

2008/06/12 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by Torahamukun Provider: 18003 Host:17853 Browser: 2067
This is visible to a Minamike apparently and, but is not so よ-く見た Minamikes.
if it is merely looking vacantly, without considering anything -- "-- all -- seeing -- kicking -- what -- っけ I think that it was a work instead of [ which is likely to forget even " and the character of the work itself / such ].
don't crush the individuality of a work by any means -- so to speak, it is a part for the core of a work So, it may be delicate and may change into the work of a different thing in an instant by one of the seasoning.
Instead of [ this ] is the very metaphor.
first of all, see all and kick The Minamike which I consider is "a Minamike with atmosphere." an original -- the beginning of an animation 1 term -- "-- Minaike 3 sister's -- with this common tale -- please do not carry out too much expectation -- the work which loosens the shoulder and can be leisurely seen freely as it is written as " And it is also warmth simultaneously.
Minaike 3 sister's harmonious everyday life is drawn, and surrounding characters are also filled with the love.
There is warmth which everybody gives so, adding that it is a family.
This atmosphere.
That to which the fun of this work also has the atmosphere, and buds for the first time there.
I think that it is a "Minamike." Needless to say, the place which is arranged [ this / alternative ] and liked is the atmosphere.
This is too dark as your 仰る.
Even if it makes it the character of a scent in spring seen at the beginning even if it made it the character of fuyuki, to this work, it is not suitable.
Although he has forgotten whether it was a some of the story, was the talk which broke the necklace of a scent especially in spring severe?
That is -- just for a moment for searching desperately, falling over and carrying out to an injury cold inside.
In an original, it is the deployment which is not considered probably.
The badness of atmosphere spoils the work.
Although it is this word truly, it is clear that the place where it was interesting also in [ of it ] being bad was seen everywhere.
Is it the talk of instant noodles?
However, about instead of [ this ], gap of a few is just going to have the place which thinks is slightly amusing in the feeling of laughter.
that is, instead of is "gag although this is how to enjoy me when a Minamike finds out laughter from atmosphere, although it says also like the point -- ろ It is because the impression as gag animation was felt strong for the wind be fastidious." make it illustrating -- make it fuyuki -- make it a parody -- The place which is not fighting by the individuality of original of this work was also able to be seen in some places.
Can the portion somewhat be regretted?
Evaluation is "bad." Although OP and ED had become a serious tone unlike 前期作, he fairly liked individually.
Of course, not kunekune production but the music itself

2008/06/06 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by OD Provider: 38670 Host:38708 Browser: 4926

[a good point]
- nothing
[Bad point]
Fishing animation which used the name of a "Minamike" for whether it is - Ming et al.

[Comprehensive evaluation]
A previous work "a Minamike" also has production which leads to an original, and I think that it was the work which both of those who know an original, and those who do not know can enjoy.
Since my result of a previous work was good, I am one person who has tried to think whether it will look at.
It has been taken in.
If made a different thing, should a maker side comment a word as all other than a voice actor and BGM, such as 1 term, a setup, production, and illustrating, "This is the occurrence of a parallel world" so far?
Evaluation is the worst.

2008/05/26 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by 果汁オレンジ Provider: 11059 Host:10838 Browser: 9034
a Minamike -- the work itself -- although it was favorite, a setup was changed [ that it is various and ] and this-work article was not interesting し [ Fuyuki of a new character considers that it was better not to take out ].
Even if 1 term attaches and looks at a pause called 2 terms, it cannot attach 1 term and 2 terms very easily with Ryosaku.

2008/05/24 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Araku Provider: 5906 Host:5965 Browser: 8090

[Good point]
There is nothing.

[Bad point]
Does mind become [ that character of the eldest daughter gentle to ] short suddenly?
It is especially the fourth talk.
Since the rule was beaten, it is the abuse which has not achieved the right of boiled rice omission, the boiled rice omission = parents who cannot exist, and a guardian.
Boiled rice is not made.
This act that does not do the duty as a person in charge of parents or a family is abuse clearly.
It is a bad influence truly at education.
The above abuse is called negurekuto.
It is never the act allowed.
Are you the top shell?
This animation.
It is the Sazae-San level which is done for the abuse line reason, such as carrying out a げんこつばっ loan or 追い出ing outside.
If parents actually do the abuse act of this animation, what does it become?
1.
a child -- somehow -- supply of food -- おこ -- the money of a paddle -- somehow -- a life -- tying -- る -- a severe life will be led 2.
Which that gets injured [ mentally serious ] is a bad influence.

[Comprehensive evaluation]
It is the worst.
It is abuse at animation.

2008/05/01 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by 眠い Provider: 1472 Host:1509 Browser: 4184
As long as the first-time hot spring time was seen, it was thought that he wanted to do a sex appeal thing without contents (although there were no outer comment with the eldest daughter was 奇乳 well).
However, when thinking whether to have begin to do a harem thing using an original character called fuyuki by beginning to feel sense of incongruity from the place which the background has become cloudy, or much black mobu have come out, and has become a horror thing, the eldest daughter had started why or hysterics and it was incomprehensible.
Although it was this incomprehensible substitute, I considered so at first, adding whether he wanted to make the "Minamike" of the interpretation different from the Doumu version.
however, it is begun suddenly to carry out the talk faithful to an original, or fuyuki is carried out at hand [ last round ], and is left -- making -- "-- this staff wanted what to carry out It was begun to have a question in deployment of " and the second half.
but ED of the last round -- Doumu version OP music -- passing -- Hosaka -- the conclusion to this question came out in me by having carried out the punch line "Doumu > it is さ to have admited to be asuriido" by oneself.
Let's exempt a lack [ the pride of asuriido ] and evaluation should be taken as the "worst."

2008/04/26 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by Gyangyangyan Provider: 26750 Host:26856 Browser: 5292
Although it was better 1 term to be sure, since the Minamike was entertained, it will still carry out this evaluation.
Animation kana in which a feeling becomes bright.
.
.

2008/04/08 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by Matsu Provider: 6245 Host:6123 Browser: 7875

[Good point]
The voice actor must not change 1 term.

[Bad point]
Strange production was worrisome.
Why is it that the face of mobu is black painting?
A meaning is not understood.
The character of a character and a motion are also amusing somewhere.
Especially a motion of the sister of OP is strange.
There is also no tempo not much well and it was not able to laugh at 2 terms at all.

[Comprehensive evaluation]
Although there is also a good place, only very bad points are conspicuous ..
Evaluation is "bad."

2008/04/06 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by 古代米ダブル Provider: 32265 Host:32231 Browser: 7087
It is original existing 読 and previous work viewing-and-listening ending.
Is it the work made after changing the work staff into asuriido from a Doumu?
It was the work of the trial which is not until now [ that the animation of a "Minamike" was made from in the work company having been divided from the first ].
Although the "difference in a style" arising from the staff being different was after preparedness, was it the still betrayed touch?
Although it seems that there is much severe criticism, I also regard it as it being unavoidable.
From the baka さ degree of kana having been puffed up at first etc., it closed its eyes because they are the relaxed and informal contents to which the screw flew somewhat.
However, it was a state to the extent that it comes to think immediately that deployment is unreasonable 苦茶 and can be called only a disappointment.
"Secondary creation is き with an original first", and I think that it is in fact very difficult so that it can make easily.
It is because it must be made after respecting the message nature which an original has.
And by adding some peculiarity there, those who make secondary creation offer the fun of a work, after respecting an original.
The skill of a supervisor or a dramatist is just going to be tried.
However, if a thing called peculiarity is pursued too much, it will spoil original merit and will be putting the cart before the horse (it is だっしゅ to ぽ in まぁ "ぱ!).
けど with which it is also a fact that there is a work with the original fun which is not in an original like ", and it cannot be retorted that it is to be sushi and that the original element of secondary creation is strong generally.
Is this work the good example?
If the most remarkable example is given, is it haruka of four talks or five talks?
Tenderness with which a sight made cold to kana or chiaki only by about a reproof is caught in original and 1 term was not felt.
The talk of this neighborhood was called composition and called punch line.
up to the treatment of [ nothing ] supper omission -- it will not be necessary to carry out ....
was just it the worst class?
This work must have been a work describing the every day of the sister who is passing common every day happily in a lively way.
it -- what -- drama daytime -- did it become a みたいな dark and violent talk?
You are seeing the talk of this neighborhood.
Did you consider so?
The back, although it seems that there is much criticism of fuyuki of a new character, I do not regard a character "the very thing" called fuyuki as bad.
the original of only animation -- one person -- there may be two persons -- since it thinks that it is ....
probably declaration of intention will be weak in introvert character, and it is the touch which is not in speaking the Hakata valve etc.
and old "Minamike" This will be very much interesting as a material, and will be good as a trial.
However, "how to treat" was the worst.
that the character of such introvert character usually makes a friend たり -- etc.
-- it grows up by carrying out However, the portion of the "growth" is not looked at by fuyuki, but probably in order for there to be also no portion which can moreover be called highlight not much, I feel that it has finished with non-individuality.
a result -- this work -- quite satisfactory adaptation -- it could not do but the impression which makes atmosphere dark conversely was received After all, for what purpose is "fuyuki?
Although it becomes calling it ", now, it does not arrange.
Since it was the original character of 折角, I wanted you to have thought more and to appoint.
It can be said that it is the work with which the composition which stands as for a character and does not understand a position from the above thing was conspicuous.
However, the composition of the talk is also becoming good and per eight to 11 talk thinks that it was interesting probably for the talk in accordance with the original.
When carrying out even the foundation exactly, sushi and after elaborating the plan to a slight degree, the bad talk was the staff who does not make, and should it be made?
About illustrating, the way of one original to begin is such touch, and is carried out the bottom, and especially the place worried in respect of a design does not have it.
however, it is not good in respect of color -- however -- it is .
I thought that it could not be obtained that the color of the hair of haruka and chiaki replaced the previous work.
It is how [ this ] that the face of after and mobu is black painting.
That was also uncanny and individually disagreeable.
an animation -- just for a moment ....
isn't there any motion of the kana of the place of OP and ED?
It is an invertebrate animal.
Although it is a general comment, suppose severely "It is bad." It is differentiated with an original and the adventurous spirit which ran to the original element is accepted.
However, when it was it, did I want you to make so that an original fan can also be convinced?

2008/04/06 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Naooki Provider: 4197 Host:4200 Browser: 8090

[Good point]
A voice actor is 1 term, and together and a theme song.

[Bad point]
Although a pattern theme song is good (although it is becoming tame on the way and being cooked), the existence of fuyuki of an original character which does not suit a Minamike is odd.
haruka was made into disagreeable, in addition my elder sister in 3 and 4 talk.

[comprehensive evaluation]
-- although it was the worst at first -- the kana of the second half -- getting sick -- mulberry butter -- it says -- talking -- I thought the kana which was better than the original as for tempo It received in Hosaka having misunderstood overseas studying abroad of haruka and having performed it sea outside in the after last talk, by maji.
When fuyuki was merely involved, although it had become talking, it was regrettable good for there to be nothing with where and to be moved [ good for a Minamike ] by the dark work, although it is an usually bright work when it talks.
Although comprehensive evaluation was near the worst the first half, the place at which it can laugh on the whole is also "good" in あったん's.

2008/04/05 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by Tasogare Provider: 1871 Host:1562 Browser: 6342

[Good point]
- voice actor is not changing.
- Fuyuki appeared compared with the 1st term and there was new deployment.
- ぷち toribia of a next preliminary announcement.

[Bad point]
The breakdown is caused to a setup (view of the world), if it lets it pass the - 1st term and sees.
Although there is change of ていう and some, probably, change of a school and that building (it takes in between and contains) will be useless 8s ちゃs.
When carrying out from oneself, quite intense sense of incongruity and stress were felt at first.
[ who looked at the 1st term and got interested in this work group ] - A setup of characters pushes whether it became strange and has become baka in general.
Original Although it is non-読, after seeing the 1st term, it does not come to feel that the original is ridiculed as it is.
- Sense of incongruity is extremely felt for OP.
It does not come to feel that it un-balances with the character of a work.
- A background character is なっちゃっている to the mole.
- The meaning of a subtitle is not understood with sufficient not good.
- The treatment of Fuyuki of an original character is too severe.
I think that I may treat a little more carefully because it produced with much trouble.

[Comprehensive evaluation]
Since it finished seeing a work, if it thinks and sees, don't regard the 2nd term as the sequel of the 1st term.
Naturally, since the result of the 1st term was good, if it compares, if evaluation of this work falls and catches with a sequel above all, it will become impossible to take adjustment to the difference in too much setup, and the work world will collapse.
Even if it comes out and becomes independent about this work, that a background character is a mole too feels sense of incongruity considerably.
Although there was production which was before alike also by OP of "I n ち" The people and the background character which are firmly drawn at that time interchange several times.
From depiction referred to as that a main character turns into a background character being carried out, if it sees with the viewpoint of other background characters even if, although it is a main character An intention of the maker "the hero in the world is himself, and they are only backgrounds even if others are" is transmitted intensely, and admiration is indeed carried out.
such [ in this work ] an intention -- it cannot feel -- somehow -- "-- drawing -- めんど -- it was stinking -- " -- しか -- it was not felt This point is very regrettable.
Furthermore, I think that the treatment of Fuyuki was somewhat too severe.
For Chiaki who surely such "good child" has actually, and self-asserts clearly, it is impatient, and the intention for which it was made to dare use a dialect when saying real intention, although the intention made to appear in order to make it contrast with Chiaki is understood is not understood well.
Although it may be having wanted to direct expression of the self real intention which is not performance, since treatment is halfway, the effect feels that it is not fully demonstrated.
Very regrettable.
ぷち toribia of a next preliminary announcement "like hayate!
Although it was in the 3rd term", since he fairly liked individually, this point received the remarkable good impression.
Furthermore, it is also raised with some times that there was a story regarded as interesting.
Moreover, good expression of laver is carried out as whole, and if it is those who can enjoy this work alone, I will think that it will be the work of まぁまぁ.
individual -- "of ED of the last round -- it passes away, and it carries out and the intention of daily last arrival point" does not borrow by not good What did the members of manufacture really want to transmit to a televiewer?
A personal opinion "in the past, even this was its reaching point.
However, grown-up himself can be reached further at the point.
Although it thinks whether a track is saying since it continues to where", where is real intention sure enough?
It expects that there is a day of when or a day told by the maker.

2008/04/01 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by Rogi Provider: 18003 Host:17898 Browser: 4635
If it says at a word the "創りたい portion" by the side of a maker and the televiewer's "portion to see" have shifted -- a work .
* OOO-" of the manufacture side which was not accepted in "televiewer when using vulgar language the 2nd young generation newly located on the cookroom when the metaphor would consume the がっつり pork cutlet bowl at lunch and it went into the restaurant serving everyday meals of a town -- what -- と -- ち狂った and "-- a pork cutlet bowl is also renewed and it is made a "cutlet rice bowl" after this so that the partner of the large 客層 can be carried out Suppose that " and small joke た物 were taken out.
the visitor who came to eat the pork cutlet bowl of a normal -- naturally -- striking -- gire and "-- んじゃ which considers what Who is such もん持っ lever い言ったぁ!
It roars out about with ".
What or such touch.
たろう to which the play heart by the side of a producer had the top of the head of the third daughter also in uneune 動く's.
To me, it was incomprehensible.
He had a disagreeable feeling which bit sand in Fuyuki's appearance.
が and this must also have had a clear intention.
if it does not come out -- a dialect -- only yurui should not come out [ exposed unsophisticated and awkward gaki んちょ ] in the comics (what was made into animation) of a good point Didn't he want to make his eyes turned outside from the closed world like the lukewarm water which gudaguta(ed) the televiewer by throwing a foreign substance at the view of the world with which it closed and was filled inside, and a character?
Fuyuki's existence must have been successful if it was in the meaning.
Free, "who is such もん持っ lever いって言った!
Rebounding called ".
Subsequent sharp decrease of the number of times of an appearance.
Fade-out [ without almost being involved in a hero sister ] called transfer.
a result -- what -- it became impossible to find out the significance of existence for whether it has moved out for carrying out Sad Fuyuki.
Are you I who wish he wants to use bad one for lukewarm water after all?
Or are you ぶっ or a beam maker about cold water?
さぁ, which.
Evaluation is common.

Next / Post your review / Top page

Other media
Anime:Minamike

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.