Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Anime ranking: Rank 1,106/in 2,709 titles (Total 9.00/Deviation 48.35) Rank 1,105 <= => Rank 1,107
Anime ranking of 2004: Rank 71/in 144 titles Rank 70 <= => Rank 72

Ojyamajyo Doremi Naisho(Anime)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Information about this title

TOEI ANIMATION CO., LTD
Kuriyama Midori Akatsuki Yamatoya Yumi Kageyama Reiko Yoshida Naritayoshimi Atsushi Maekawa
Takuya Igarashi Junichi Sato Shigeyasu Yamauchi Yabeakinori Yamayoshiyasuo Mamoru Hosoda Hiroaki Sakurai
Yoshihiko Umakoshi Ryuji Yamada
Keiichi Oku
Chiemi Chiba Tomoko Akiya Yuki Matsuoka Rumi Shishido Nami Miyahara Ikue Otani
Nao Nagasawa Nobuaki Kanemitsu Sawa Ishige
Hyosei Ai Nagano Romi Park
Koki Miyata Shigeru Chiba Tomo Saeki
Taeko Kawata Kumiko Watanabe

Released:2004/06/26 in Japan End:2004/12/11 in Japan

Official sites
1. http://www.toei-anim.co.jp/tv/doremi_n/ (Translation)

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	AnimeRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Very good(1.80)	1,106	48.35	9.00

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	3,026	5	5
Outside Japan	270	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

20.0%

40.0%

0.0%

Added percentage

20%

60%

100%

Summary

100%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 30
4 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/09/19 Good [Original Japanese review]
by OP屋さん Provider: 22700 Host:22657 Browser: 8901
The number of OP animations is 6/10.
The number of OP music is 6/10.
A comprehensive score is good at 12/20.

2008/09/02 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by Okeihan Provider: 36237 Host:36162 Browser: 5292

[a good point]
-- causes, such as convenience of - reorganization, and a plan "into which a swimming suit cannot go", -- it is -- volume on ja witch book では -- episode, such as Valentine, a swim meet, etc.
which were not seen, be contained - Although it is the OVA-animation of only 13 talks, a new song is used, and illustrating of OP is at the full-service-broadcasting time.
Be refined.
There is much talk for slightly big friends.

[a bad point]
-- which that became my - おばあ -- the side seen [ draw / the Mino scene ] takes imaginative power -- has it left the child?
I consider.
- Illustrating of ED is delicate....
It says clearly and advertisement of the first purikyua included in seven volumes is unnecessary addition.

[comprehensive evaluation]
- it was very much good monochrome A fan could be more satisfied.
A price is kana slightly high as animation for children.

2007/06/01 Best! [Original Japanese review]
by 水色♪ Provider: 15095 Host:15309 Browser: 4483
OVA was also very good.
Illustrating was good and OP and ED were also pleased.
It and the talk are also seen each time, and it did not 飽き bored, and said very, or television animation had the different pleasure, and it was very good.
A little last round has cried too.
There was no animation with sad finishing with honto so far until now.
Evaluation is the "highest."

2006/04/30 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Miruguru Provider: 467 Host:552 Browser: 6287
Did only this become independent or do I also want others to become independent?
Although a stage setup is with も, ~ っ, are dokka - n black histories too?
Is a level quite high at Jun-ichi Sato Mr.
editorial supervision?
illustrating -- even if it says from the quality of - talk, is it considerable and isn't there any 13-talk petty talk?
Does having applied spot to sub kyara also have an inside story something in the feature?
I think that it is higher quality than dokka - n at least.
Since it is likable from purikyua, evaluation is good.

2006/04/29 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by 曲がり角のアイツ Provider: 40763 Host:40597 Browser: 4483
Did the evaluation column of naisho become independent?
Being as satojun enacted editorial supervision, a quality is the highest.
The new fact of surprise and a back situation are also incorporated reasonable, and could be said that all (it will not come out of the region of an "addition" after all well) 13 talks and hazure are nothing.
Subtracting さ as the commercial birthmark of seeing only with sukapaa and DVD, evaluation is "very good."

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.