Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews
Others
Site map

Search / Outside DB:

Anime ranking: Rank 2,109/in 2,686 titles (Total 0.00/Deviation 47.32) Rank 2,108 <= => Rank 2,110
Anime ranking of 2006: Rank 131/in 193 titles Rank 130 <= => Rank 132

Playball 2nd(Anime)


[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)
ForumImages
Information about this title

KTV Miyazaki Telecasting Co.,ltd. Chiba Television broadcasting Corp JRT Shikoku Broadcasting Co.,Ltd. RKK Kumamoto Broadcasting Television Saitama Co.,Ltd. KAGOSHIMA TELEVISION STATION Co.,Ltd. Tokyo Metropolitan Television Broadcasting Corp. Gunma TV (GTV)
San-in Chuo Television Broadcasting Co.,Ltd. TV Kanagawa Nagano Broadcasting Systems Inc. Ehime Broadcasting Co.Ltd Sendai Television Broadcasting Corp. Kochi Sun Sun Broadcasting, Inc. Ishikawa TV. TOKAI TELEVISION BROADCASTING CO., LTD. ANIMAX Broadcast Japan
Akio Chiba SHUEISHA
Shichiro Kobayashi
Glovision Inc.
Kaoru Wada Avex mode(avex mode)
EIKEN Co.,Ltd.
Setsuko Shibuichi
SATOSHI DEZAKI
Michio Yamagami Toshiyuki Kimori Satoshi Hino Yoshitaka Kuremoto Takashi Hikida
Shinsuke Hukui Koichi Shibasaki Oki Sugiyama Kenji Iwama Yutaka Kouno Umeji Sasaki Keiko Tsukamoto

Released:2006/01/09 in Japan
Official sites
1. http://www.anime-playball.com/ (Translation)
Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)
 AverageAnimeRankDeviation(Total)Evaluation points(Total)Best of the Best
Inside JapanGood(0.00)2,10947.320.00 

Statics of activity

Total ViewsCommentEvaluation
Inside Japan2,93533
Outside Japan19900

How others evaluated in Japan

BestVery GoodGoodNormalBadVery BadWorst
People1000110
Percentage33.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%33.3%33.3%0.0%
Added percentage33.3%33.3%33.3%33.3%66.6%99.9%100%
Summary33.3%0%66.6%
                                                                                                   

Views for recent 8 days
Total2928272625242322
3
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0

LanguageSorted by dateSorted by recommendation New!
EnglishGood
(Only Evaluation)
Normal
(Only Evaluation)
Bad
(Only Evaluation)
All
(Only Evaluation)
None
JapaneseGood
(Only Evaluation)
Normal
(Only Evaluation)
Bad
(Only Evaluation)
All
(Only Evaluation)
None
This reputation board


Post your review / Top page
The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2007/09/06 Best! [Original Japanese review]
by Makkusu Provider: 44438 Host:44375 Browser: 5234
[Good point] A feeling of an actor playing a comic role thinks skillful く演じられてた!
Kana which had not managed difficult 役どころ.
[Comprehensive evaluation] I thought that it was a good player.

2007/02/21 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by HUNGRY SPIDER Review history[Good:2(40%) Normal:1(20%) Bad:2(40%)] / Provider: 14019 Host:14235 Browser: 7395
Well, can't inferiority be denied because the "start of the game" which can also be called previous work was quite the result?
I think that touch more realistic honestly in tale than a previous work had come out.
Although it began from the place where a 墨谷 high school is suddenly made into kotenpan in a game with outstanding player quantity, was it thought individual that this was not a mistake?
The "inflation" pointed out by the previous work was giving persuasive power firmly to the thing that it was a belief.
Although it was so sick that like [ a strife / even if the strife with Kurahashi repeated also leads the whole volume / irritate, carry out the viewing-and-listening close and ] was thought, I am saying at the future that it is the product of the feeling (consideration) of Kurahashi, and think that persuasive power was given.
It was the touch which was doing its best also about the main baseball.
It is also good that there is no Tadokoro senior 鬱陶しく as Marui.
However, if it is said whether it is directly connected with the charm (put in another way as fun when it is many) of a work even if there is a tale actual feeling, I will feel that it is different.
although it is a time-tested product [ say / "a struggle and changes" of a weak team ] like a previous work -- a televiewer -- 惹き -- the price -- compared with る展開, charm was considerably missing し [ the strife is looking and a feeling is not good ] -- Was also it also sad that the pair of Marui for whom many turn was prepared by the previous work, and igarashi was not seen again?
Although it may be being to it in an original if it is said that that was right, since it is animation, there is a thought to which I wanted you to take out the sex appeal of the about.
It is degradation of a theme song that was the most painful to it.
Two music, that Mr.
" whom loose doggusu of a previous work sings gets something", and a "rainbow", was wonderful without the compliment.
Although the tenet smell and that it seemed to be old also have the theme song of the captain version, the music which flowed when the "start of the game" started and which was made into that 溌剌 is not forgotten in a good meaning.
When that Mr.
Taniguchi came back after this, there was power to which a breast is tingled.
so, the thing which cannot accept this idiot (way of speaking is bad) た感じ easily -- it is -- rolling up -- it was .
if such の is held by beginning -- exhaustion -- it is excessive Moreover, ED also cannot but feel a remarkable fall.
The good impression while a "rainbow" hears it, to the extent that he wants to make a bicycle run was only given.
-- If theme songs are also some works and it will catch, is this a considerable demerit mark element?
However, although "thank you" which flowed in the last talk did not have just the dignity of its captain days, it matched and asked the skillful く scene and was refreshing.
Although the same group as a theme song had sung, "putting-the-right-man-in-the-right-place" って language was remembered in -- etc.
Although it is clear that it was a work with the place which shines even if compared with a previous work not to mention it does not think that it is a work severe like it applies mud to a work, the displeasure when looking is quite large.
That is, since it is classified into the failure work which is not good as for a mental health top, supposing it checks on its standard and gives evaluation, it will become bad [ near "being bad" / "very bad" ].
However, although it became a repetition, since there was also a good place, do you think that it is a quite regrettable work?

2006/04/17 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by y.k Provider: 7525 Host:7609 Browser: 5234
Evaluation is raised 1 ranku.
"It is bad" from "being very bad." The heart was struck to words called Taniguchi's words "it is also in a fortunate fellow only by doing baseball!" -- although it is only it -- some -- ?
(smile) -- the stop which a motion is too common, and merely "is bad" as sport animation since the touch which does not carry out how, and which daradara(ed) cannot be denied Last comment 2006/03/29 23:55:31 Although the thing with a very bad, old style is not worried individually, can't honest not much good evaluation be performed?
That is, it is if Kurahashi, Nakayama and others are planning to quarrel till when.
Would you carry out random reconciliation?
-- It is not nothing if like, less than it quarrels over irony during a game and it quarrels, and it is unsightly.
Taniguchi is going to make it reconciled well with much trouble -- moreover, the action and an utterance to which either becomes trouble -- carrying out -- shaking -- taking out -- 。 It is looking and becomes unpleasant here.
It does not win straight victories in the state of such a team.
a story -- fundamental -- quarrel -> -- it is boring with the subject which reconciliation -> is temporarily different at a repetition of quarrel ->-- Isn't there any neta?
By the captain, I think that such an unsightly scene could not almost be found.
OP is also delicate.
A captain's OP is inferior also to OP of the start of the game (-less mark) which ろ and za loose doggusu sings.
But the time on which Taniguchi performs an operation for a finger is the comparatively good kana.
In saying, evaluation is "very bad."
Post your review / Top page
ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.
Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.



Please give your evaluation or comment.

You need two other people's comment to post your comment again after you post your evaluation or comment.

Your Name(Required)
Password (Required. more than 4 characters)
Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.
Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.


Top page of DB | Site map | Copyright(c) 1999- 1st Class All rights reserved