Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews 		Others
Site map
Search / Outside DB:
Anime ranking: Rank 1,956/in 2,678 titles (Total 0.96/Deviation 47.42) Rank 1,955 <= => Rank 1,957
Anime ranking of 2005: Rank 92/in 155 titles Rank 91 <= => Rank 93

School Rumble OVA(Anime)


[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)		ForumImagesGoods
(DVD)
Latest DVD: 2008/06/17 ():School Rumble: Extra Class OVA $98
DVD(2hit)
Sales/Latest
Rank:28778
School Rumble: Extra Class OVA

Tag:$98
2008/06/17
()
School Rumble Ova

2007/02/20
()
Information about this title

Jin Kobayashi Weekly Boys Magazine Koudansha
Shinji Takamatsu
Hiroko Tokita
Hajime Watanabe
Ami Koshimizu
Hiroki Kohishi
Hiroki Takahashi
Mamiko Noto
Yui Horie
Hitomi Nabatame
Kaori Shimizu

Released:2005/12/22 in Japan
Official sites
1. http://www.school-rumble.net/ (Translation)
Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)
 AverageAnimeRankDeviation(Total)Evaluation points(Total)Best of the Best
Inside JapanGood(0.12)1,95647.420.96 

Statics of activity

Total ViewsCommentEvaluation
Inside Japan5,47498
Outside Japan21700

How others evaluated in Japan

BestVery GoodGoodNormalBadVery BadWorst
People0034010
Percentage0.0%0.0%37.5%50.0%0.0%12.5%0.0%
Added percentage0%0%37.5%87.5%87.5%100%100%
Summary37.5%50.0%12.5%
                                                                                                   

Views for recent 8 days
Total2019181716151413
5
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
0

LanguageSorted by dateSorted by recommendation New!
EnglishGood
(Only Evaluation)		Normal
(Only Evaluation)		Bad
(Only Evaluation)		All
(Only Evaluation)		None
JapaneseGood
(Only Evaluation)		Normal
(Only Evaluation)		 Bad
(Only Evaluation)		All
(Only Evaluation)		All
This reputation board

Post your review / Top page
The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.
2008/04/28 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by moon-moon Provider: 1657 Host:1741 Browser: 6395
I feel that it seldom changed in [ as the TV version ] contents.
as [ make / OVA / it ] -- talking -- the kana of だった Is it mere omake of the TV version?
What was necessary was just to have done in 2 terms.
2007/12/17 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Naooki Provider: 2745 Host:2698 Browser: 8090
It was a bath peep individually, and harima and 嬢 were [ suited / the eye ] interesting in things, and it was good.
The place where the bird carried out the smile demand and was made into rara now [ after ] at bokoboko was also interesting, and he liked it.
2007/08/27 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by RaRF Provider: 23812 Host:24071 Browser: 6214
Although there was neta into which a hero does and thrusts the next preliminary announcement of two terms in the end of one term, when this OVA came out, it was impressive that Karasuma appeared whether 2 term broadcasts were decided with the character of "winning the case." Especially contents were not like [ which is set to OVA ], either, and were the same laver as the TV version.
2006/11/15 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Fusuu Provider: 31888 Host:31885 Browser: 3646
I think that it is faithful to an original with it being fundamental.
The necessity of dividing the TV version and evaluation especially is not felt.
However, a difference to the extent that it says that expressional regulation is generous appropriate for OVA.
But he was able to be enjoyed so so.
2006/08/06 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by Miruguru Provider: 467 Host:552 Browser: 6287
Since there was an opportunity to see, it viewed and listened for the time being.
the contents -- the complement of the first term of animation -- みたいな -- feeling -- coming out -- a theme song -- having been the same .
Also like [ which affects mind although there was それっぽい depiction etc., since it was OVA well ].
I think whether he can be enjoyed, if it is an original fan.
Evaluation is made common.
2006/04/30 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by Matsu Provider: 4365 Host:4433 Browser: 3846
Atmosphere was almost the same as the television version, and was able to be enjoyed.
But the scent of Eros something ..
The reason set to OVA was found somehow.
2006/03/07 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by Marin Provider: 30606 Host:30421 Browser: 3846
It does not understand wanting what do call it the vital point or to do.
a love -- does it sprout [ whether it is rice, whether it is gag, and ]?
.
.
Although it seems to slide on all.
2006/01/26 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Guruguruneko Provider: 1601 Host:1573 Browser: 5234
Most contents are based on an original.
The impression that it is more faithful than television something since there is not necessarily original deployment.
I also regard Yakumo feeler (hair of ていう or hair), and Eros ?
as it being as an original.
Although the evaluation column of the television version and the OVA version is separate, since it is the complement of the television version in contents, I think thing ?
which must not be together.
It is sushi without opening's having also completely changed whether it is a meaning called a complement and whether it is omission.
He was able to be enjoyed as an original fan.
Are there any 2 term supplementary lessons for the time being?
sabage is felt like seeing in school.
2005/12/22 Comment(normal) [Original Japanese review]
by Esupaa Provider: 8276 Host:8301 Browser: 3875
If it says so, is it sale today?
Although a certain comment site of animation or an adult comic something was seen ...
Is it seemed to be the somehow surprising result that it is as putting in Eros by Yakumo having been enough caught by the feeler although it is (?) and healthy original な筈 たり?
...
Is it original collapse?
Although he wants to see if there is an opportunity well, it is becoming uneasy conversely having expected.
Such an eroticism does not need sukuran.
It is thing sufficient by healthy sex appeal.
(Being the eye which was out of order) Even so, って one "which will be met again when じゃあ and spring come" ...
よな ...
which is not with a manufacture するっ lever about the 2nd term supposing it carries out or, although the meaning of じゃあ is not understood.
Post your review / Top page
ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.
Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Please give your evaluation or comment.

You need two other people's comment to post your comment again after you post your evaluation or comment.

Your Name(Required)
Password (Required. more than 4 characters)
Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.
Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.

Top page of DB | Site map | Copyright(c) 1999- 1st Class All rights reserved