Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Anime ranking: Rank 46/in 2,686 titles (Total 247.47/Deviation 76.54) Rank 45 <= => Rank 47
Anime average points ranking: Rank 43/in 1,395 titles (Average 2.19(Very good)/Deviation 65.15) Rank 42 <= => Rank 44 (more than 10 evaluatoin)
Anime ranking of 2001: Rank 6/in 91 titles Rank 5 <= => Rank 7

Siawasesou no Okojyosan(Anime)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Information about this title

TV TOKYO Corporation HAKUSENSHA LaLa Satoru Nishizono Fujitatsutomu Yoku Shioya
RADIX
Mika Sakenobe
Miyuki Sawashiro Yutaka Koizumi Masami Yamazaki Nanae Kato Asuka Tanii
Atsushi Imaruoka Hiroki Takahashi Eriko Kigawa Eiji Takemoto Sugita Tomokazu
Sumi Mutou Jyunko Takeuchi Mayumi Sho Takashi Matsuyama
Haruhi Terada

Released:2001/10/02 in Japan End:2002/09/24 in Japan

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	AnimeRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Very good(2.19)	46	76.54	247.47

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	24,414	133	113
Outside Japan	400	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

55.8%

25.7%

10.6%

3.5%

0.9%

2.7%

Added percentage

55.8%

81.5%

92.1%

95.6%

96.5%

97.4%

100%

Summary

92.1%

3.5%

4.5%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22
9 2 1 1 0 1 1 0 3

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation New!
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) All
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation New!
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	All

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/08/20 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by ハナムケ王子 Provider: 35107 Host:34886 Browser: 8593
As for this animation, the original had many animal abuse scenes, and although it was not good, the touch [ royal road animal animation ] considered as a warm heart carries out and was interesting [ the direction of animation ].
The animation thinks from an original that it is one of good new examples.

2008/03/18 Best! [Original Japanese review]
by COOL Provider: 54698 Host:54741 Browser: 3876
It is the leading masterpiece animation which will accelerate the interest of small animal animation.
Although the animation (example : 徹之進, an animal alley) of the kind referred to as being the chaotic system comedy which is the high tension which an adult can also enjoy if a lid is opened was not new while there was atmosphere in which such pretty animals appear and which truly "is childlike", if now came, since such animation could not not much be found those days, it seemed to be very new.
And the variation of the talk is also rich to the talk and the talk of the bonds of a pet and an owner of it not only merely showing off the gag of a uke aim, but having revealed the episode of the past of a character exactly, and okojo 番町 of a supplementary biography.
It could be called the royal road in the royal road of the animation of a small animal.
Although the evaluation here is seen and understood, the reason in which a fan deep-rooted even now is is also known!
Seeing is believing!
Let's see at once!

2008/01/14 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by 天罰 Provider: 1181 Host:1007 Browser: 9835
Since it saw before very well, although he does not remember in detail, it is impressive that Mr.
okojo had.
[ absurdly dear ] what or w okojo 飼いたい to which the small animal took since having tried to be fastidious -- consider たり -- w The contents are the animation of the touch which added the animal alley with ham Taro and was divided by 2.
The gag which does not 飽き bored, leaving the loveliness of okojo was developed.
okojo -- a school gang leader -- very well -- memorizing -- て -- w By the gag animation of this system, I think that it was the animation which was able to be enjoyed uniquely.

2007/10/16 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by 西方神起 Provider: 20398 Host:20334 Browser: 5234
[Good point] It is considering as - warm heart and is dear.
- Man and an animal have an individual character.
- okojo 番町 -- it is interesting [Bad point] There is no - kojoruu い and others.
[Comprehensive evaluation] I think that it is the one quite above as animation of an animal!!
It is regrettable that the leading role has been taken by kojoruu by the half on the way.
Poisonous electric wave deployment thinks that it is good for a favorite man.

2007/10/07 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by KOU斗 Provider: 22685 Host:22428 Browser: 5234
It is and they are better seed -- and such a work.
Evaluation is good.
Reason ..
There is memory which I had made to laugh very much those days.
Well, if "strange thing -" and twins ?
to say are considered calmly now, they are fearful something.
There is a scene which remains in recollections only one.
It is the means which a hero (that, これって okojo Mr.
?) and Mr.
okojo were two-person tripods in an athletic meet and something, and two persons (one person and one animal ?) took since a breath did not suit when running ordinarily.
when said by sound effects, it roared with laughter to how to "piropiro-♪" see and run the touch [ た / touch ] It is memory those with such recollections, furthermore very much good.
since -- if many things are considered while writing あ and now, I will have felt that "it is very good" is sufficient

2007/09/09 Best! [Original Japanese review]
by PLEDGE Provider: 35764 Host:35648 Browser: 6034
Such better seed [ with animation ] -.
The volume on supplementary biography is substantial and there is a hama った memory considerably.
If said at a word, it just called it the primer of animal animation.
It is thought that it is not the seen work which felt and was made for children.
If this is called mere imitation of とっ and こ ham Taro, other animal animation will all correspond.
(Smile) There are unprecedented gag based on the Darwinian world and a talk of being impressed while it is interesting and the atmosphere considered as a warm heart from 目線 of the pet kept by man is brewed usually.
since the knowledge over the animal which made okojo the start is also incorporated -- the person whom the animation of an animal likes -- laughing (although it is not って --) -- if gag is a favorite man, I think that they are many animation to the last which can be boiled and enjoyed Although it was in the words of って OP "which will get used to everybody happiness if it meets", here which is a televiewer became really fortunate.
It is these days which thinks also wants people of PTA to follow example of animation which will be vomited occasionally, and to say.

2007/09/02 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by ROSE Provider: 6682 Host:6378 Browser: 5234
The argument of action of the man who cannot aim at intention understanding, and animals was new, and interesting.
However, about the portion which draws the viewpoint seen from the animal, so that it is too real, I think that the pros and cons are divided by whether it is disagreeable whether he likes animal animation.
Although he tries to want for there to be many people in comparison with ham Taro, it is Ryosaku farther than ham Taro.

2007/09/02 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by Akanechan Provider: 18003 Host:17949 Browser: 4641
Although I dislike ham Taro Although it is petty one, the place of 本作 which influences mutually and suits is very good.
since neither man and animals including Mr.
okojo, nor the ruffian set (narrator is also good) talk has [ kyara which will be Ryosaku ] the link of the talk of a human side and an animal side not much at ham Taro as for this -- honesty -- Good [ long piece / okojo watch / which was drawing the difference in man's viewpoint splendidly with the animal / with which the human side and the animal side were united again ].
Since only ぷち子みたいな kyara was known until it saw this which was surprised by Ms.
after 沢城 Miyuki's performance power, since the gag which is not made in this editing was also made, if it was a watch long piece

2007/09/02 Best! [Original Japanese review]
by 酪農 Provider: 14861 Host:14554 Browser: 4184
It is the animation which was not seen even if it aimed at ham Taro's mere imitation at the beginning, and it thought that it became the animation in which only this has a deep-rooted fan between kemonaa now although it was the work with which it was opposed to the animation-izing itself since an original had much depiction of animal abuse.
The example to which only this succeeded in animation-ization is heresy.
So, it is the warm-heart animation which is looking anyhow and gets used to the gained feeling.
A complete change is undergone with the original.
the inside of the role to which Ms.
沢城 Miyuki played Mr.
okojo (kojopii) of a hero until now -- most -- hot blood -- I think that it is 漢な kyara Human kyara is only strange kyara in a good meaning.
(Smile) kyara which treated adults, such as a veterinarian who goes mad whenever it sees kyara and okojo which do not change the countenance which herahera(ed), when angry, while crying to an expressionless owner and it, and a cartoonist made to follow like the degree of 毎 on a deadline, with contempt is also good -- it is 味出(ing) The okojo watch long piece which drew contact of an animal with man was also able to be enjoyed.
(ぶっちゃけ -- at least … って思う was substantial for whether I could make it this editing here) The tempo which attaches the waging-war table of kyara and kyara, or makes a real life form like a battle was also good.
(It is regrettable that the waging-war table has been lost where Mr.
okojo is merely defeated successively three times but --.) This animation does not think "ham Taro's mere imitation" positively.
It is more proper to call it ham Taro's adult version.
(Smile)

2007/07/30 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by Morugan Provider: 12883 Host:12895 Browser: 2977(Mobile)
it was [!!
] very interesting if you like an animal -- 見なきゃ -- probably, it will be bad Appearance, kojopii of a hero with the intense gap of character, and the exchange of owner Tsuchitani who does not have forgiveness although it is silent and is cool were interesting.
But it is regrettable that animal kyara which asks the heroine was not.
Although kojoruu is a scalpel, し [ it is みそっ or す kyara ] --

2007/07/28 Best! [Original Japanese review]
by 半蔵 Provider: 30067 Host:29888 Browser: 5234
the drama nature of every character -- personal history of each kyara is revealed -- becoming brave -- てい -- okojo of a supplementary biography -- it is also interesting that kyara of this editing total-appears in a school gang leader Is the animation of the hamster of somewhere which is existence and to which it is thin and only the number has increased kyara a large difference?
That is useless.
It says clearly --

2007/07/22 Best! [Original Japanese review]
by Hiroyuki Provider: 40798 Host:40700 Browser: 4925
I am also one inner person to whom animal animation took by this animation.
although it seems to be ordinary dear animal animation -- which carries out a kyaraga appearance if it glances -- black gag and kyara -- even if one-animal 漢気 of one animal is felt and a grown-up person sees as it is -- impressiveness -- enough It completely has that it is said that this work is better than ham Taro, and it is a natural thing.

2007/07/21 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by 斬 Provider: 42529 Host:42609 Browser: 6287
Since action of the animals which are top-class fun as gag animation is dear, can it evaluate also as animation dimly?
Mr.
okojo -- being impudent -- although -- an in fact fairly cowardly place -- saying -- it is -- chorori of a hamster and たっちん of a ferret are also good -- it is 味出(ing) but okojo which that he liked was sometimes doing as a supplementary biography by this animation -- there was much turn of Mr.
okojo and better than the usual talk which was a school gang leader

2007/07/16 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by ソーダ石灰 Provider: 52539 Host:52390 Browser: 5234
It is very interesting if compared with とっ and こ ham Taro.
The view of the world drawn from the eye of an animal, the serious talk describing personal history of a hero's okojo, the talk containing the gag and parody of light laver, and this editing are abundant in highlights to the talk (school gang leader editing) in another world.
The person who was not interested in the animation of an animal will also think that the image to an animal changes, if this animation is seen.
(Being a natural good meaning) When it says why it was not simply made the "highest", it is that ばっ loan spot has hit kojoruu and existence of a hero's okojo (kojopii) has become simple the second half.
If that is improved, I will think that it was the highest without a complaint.

2007/03/03 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by にゃん☆ Provider: 53451 Host:53410 Browser: 4487
This is interesting truly!
They were a certain meaning and a large masterpiece.
the center of okojo, and an owner and Tsuchitani -- surrounding kyara -- individual -- super-uniqueness -- especially Tsukahara, a veterinarian, was very intensely deep -- it can become silent -- although it was ikemen, it was considerably grim kyara (smile) since the last round was collected considerably -- evaluation -- "it is very good"

2007/03/03 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by 今むき Provider: 47432 Host:47334 Browser: 5234
I think that it is more interesting than ham Taro It was the work with which especially Tuchiya, an owner, can laugh at okojo and other kyara by interesting kyara!
The last round was also Ryosaku's thing!
only -- since there was also a place where broadcast that time is not much petty, this evaluation is regrettable, and it is less than a slim margin at keroro -- it is very good although come out and carried out

2006/06/10 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Toropisuto Provider: 265 Host:139 Browser: 5145
ほんわ or a mood is also thrust in with laughter of nonstop and, sometimes, it is also a tear.
He had no overwhelming されっぱ to the color depth of a feeling of variety.
It merely overcame only by 面白み.
But even if there are 8s ぱっぱり面白み, is it touch?
Supposing this feeling of 面白 does not exist, is it average evaluation free to a free individual target?
But it was nice, and probably, that was able to be gone up upwards, since animal kyara was.
since the cast is putting in the members of a voice actor by experienced person serious consideration very much -- sense-of-incongruity" zero " -- since it came so far, I think that it has reached to an extreme of the extreme Production and other members of the cast were good.
but -- in which only a feeling of a setup is not accepted obediently -- an actual place and okojo should carry out for being the living thing which needs protection by Red Book, and having captured by poaching -- it is that it is in man's room a feeling of a physical disorder I of an animal lover want to come to suspect [ carry out / nothing / although the hand of whether the "Tsuchitani shake" of a hero goes to return to a mountain first or what to be should be struck ] a setup.
まぁ -- since it is the thing which the cow of a beef bowl seems to have, although Mr.
okojo without okojo is not made to influence greatly and he does not put in as a point of evaluation, since he was worried, I wanted him to do somehow, whichever it makes it Evaluation is "good" in saying.

2006/05/10 Comment(good) [Original Japanese review]
by あいかわらずな僕 Provider: 19852 Host:19963 Browser: 3875
Fun which betrays anticipation although it saw since evaluation in the site here was good.
The balance of Mr.
okojo of a hero and surrounding human beings is agreeable.
the animals which appear -- very much -- alike -- individuality and a peculiarity -- it is -- the tempo of conversation -- saying -- it is the structure in which a televiewer is not bored Although foundations are based on gag, it is also good that there is a talk talk horori occasionally.
Although it thinks that the candidate for viewing and listening is probably for a child - schoolchildren, I think that it is the animation which can also enjoy and see much more age groups.
That act considers [ that it is animal abuse, that you may call it No.
1 by animal animation as long as it sees without having the so and so and prejudice which are destroying the ecosystem, and ].

2006/01/30 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Matsu Provider: 36407 Host:36422 Browser: 3846
fairly interesting, although he seldom remembered -- it was able to laugh と -- only the impression to say remains Kana which OP also liked --

2005/09/06 Best! [Original Japanese review]
by 亮 Provider: 34156 Host:33980 Browser: 2045
It was able to laugh!
Large burst-of-laughter さ!
Although the original was browsed at the secondhand bookseller, it is certainly interesting.
Since the original story which is not in an original is also in the animation version, I want to see very much.
Although comics are also interesting, the animation version is several times more interesting!

Next / Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.