Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Anime ranking: Rank 278/in 2,686 titles (Total 68.31/Deviation 55.39) Rank 277 <= => Rank 279
Anime average points ranking: Rank 658/in 1,395 titles (Average 0.99(Good)/Deviation 52.71) Rank 657 <= => Rank 659 (more than 10 evaluatoin)
Anime ranking of 1998: Rank 10/in 67 titles Rank 9 <= => Rank 11

Sorcerous Stabber Orphen(Anime)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

Other media
Novel:Majutu si o-fen

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Goods
(DVD)

Latest DVD: 2003/04/22 ():

Orphen - The Perfect Collection $98

DVD(1hit) Sales/Latest	Books(1hit) Sales/Latest	Music(1hit) Sales/Latest
Rank:24448 Orphen - The Perfect Collection Tag:$98 2003/04/22 () Eval.:***** 1.Classic Wizards & Warriors Series	Paperback:Sorcerous Stabber Orphen 1 2002/11/30 ()	Audio CD:Sorcerous Stabber Orphen: Revenge - Original Soundtrack 1999 ()

Information about this title

Yoshinobu Akita
Monthly Dragon Magazine
TBS Hokkaido Broadcasting IWATE BROADCASTING CO.LTD TV-U FUKUSHIMA,INC. SHIN-ETSU BROADCASTING CO., LTD. TULIP-TV INC. Shizuoka Broadcasting System Chubu-Nippon Broadcasting Co.,Ltd. MBS(Mainichi Broadcasting System) I-TELEVISION INC. (i-TELEVISION INC.) RKB MAINICHI BROADCASTING CORPORATION Ryukyu Broadcasting Corpration
Mayori Sekizi Arakikenichi Yasunori Yamada Ken'ichi Kanemaki
Shichiro Kobayashi
Yota Tsuruoka
Rakuonsha
TOKYO LABORATORY LTD.
Maki Production
J.C.STAFF

[Detail]

Kadokawa Shoten Publishing Co.,Ltd.
HATAKE SHA RAN Q Yuji Matsukura
Hiroshi Watanabe
J.C.STAFF
TSUNKU TOHOKU BROADCASTING COMPANY SANYO BROADCASTING CO.,LTD KUTV Miyazaki Broadcasting Co.,Ltd.
Tokyo TV Center BANDAI VISUAL CO., LTD. Melonkinenbi
Shotaro Morikubo Mayumi Iizuka Omi Minami Emi Shinohara Kazue Ikura
Hekiru Shiina Jyoji Nakata Konami Yoshida Ryotaro Okiayu Takehito Koyasu
Tomoko Kawakami Hayashibara Megumi Yui Horie Asa Shirakura

Released:1998/10/03 in Japan End:2000/03/25 in Japan

Image gallery sites
1. Sorcerous Stabber Orphen Shitajiki Gallery

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	AnimeRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Good(0.99)	278	55.39	68.31
Outside Japan	Good(1.29)	148	48.86	9.03

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	19,205	84	69
Outside Japan	1,739	7	7

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

18.8%

23.2%

18.8%

7.2%

5.8%

2.9%

Added percentage

18.8%

42%

65.2%

84%

91.2%

97%

100%

Summary

65.2%

18.8%

15.9%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22
5 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation New!
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation New!
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

2002/11/04 Good [Unable to delete by yourself/Suggest to delete/Only this reviewer/Only this review/post sympathy comment/]
by Nanaki BH
The game was awful and really boring, making the anime look bad. The anime wasn't THAT bad... I can't say that it was good though either. I've aready forgotten the plot, and the characters are seriously annoying. Orphen can be said to be the only good character.
5/10

2002/11/02 Very good [Unable to delete by yourself/Suggest to delete/Only this reviewer/Only this review/post sympathy comment/]
by Aya-chan
It's not bad.. But I thought the game really really sucked. The anime had the cutest and fluffiest characters EVER! O_o My favorite part about this anime was the music. Very few anime soundtracks get to be my favorites... This is one of 'em. I watched the english version and the dubbing really bites, though. It could've been better..

2002/08/08 Very good [Unable to delete by yourself/Suggest to delete/Only this reviewer/Only this review/post sympathy comment/]
by Pandora
I expected this anime be be as terrible as the PS2 game was. I was totally wrong. Aside from some inconsistency in the otherwise very lovely animation and a few cringeable directorial slip-ups, this was a pretty good anime. The story could have picked up a bit faster, and maybe some clarity and detail about the final result would be nice--it ended too quickly. I haven't seen the second series yet, but this is by far better than some of the crap on American TV.

2002/06/09 Best! [Unable to delete by yourself/Suggest to delete/Only this reviewer/Only this review/post sympathy comment/]
by Hikari
This is the best anime in the WORLD!!!!
With such a cute main character, who COULD disaggree? The novel MIGHT be better than the anime. (i've never read it -.-) Anyway, great music, great characters, great animation, this is by far better than Dragon Ball Z.

2001/07/18 Very good [Unable to delete by yourself/Suggest to delete/Only this reviewer/Only this review/post sympathy comment/]
by kitana
The story Is slow...however the anime get really Interessting In the revenge series.

2001/05/17 Worst [Unable to delete by yourself/Suggest to delete/Only this reviewer/Only this review/post sympathy comment/]
by HIK
i read "Novel" first. And i can say the Animation, "it's worst"
but i can say "not bad" As a separated works from novel.

1999/10/30(Sat) Very good [Unable to delete by yourself/Suggest to delete/Only this reviewer/Only this review/post sympathy comment/]
by H.K
I love Azaly.

Post your review / Top page

Other media
Novel:Majutu si o-fen

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/03/11 Best! [Original Japanese review]
by 健 Provider: 12883 Host:12896 Browser: 3107(Mobile)
Those days, himself who was a schoolchild is the animation which was being seen to pleasure in the morning every week.
It notices that this animation existed recently and is way reexamination better た immediately.
When seen anew, did Mr.
Tamotsu Morihisa perform a hero's oofuen?
Although the story was the memory in which it deals, that it is the world of magic remembered it.
the time of being a schoolchild -- merely -- an aria -- kakkoii and work -- kakkoii and that reason -- seeing -- I have you -- it was -- although -- when seen now, the gag x serious element was the animation of a full load Character 立ち was solid, and the psychological description is expressed finely and thinks that it was good, so that you may say that it is wonderful.
Although the original novel has not read, if it is interesting so far by animation, is an original quite highly complete?

2007/10/21 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by Mr.KN Provider: 18003 Host:17836 Browser: 4620
From origin, although the direction of not the novel version but the animation version of having known this work was the point, and a setup fundamental for the reason, the difference in a character, etc.
were not known at all, since he liked the animation of such adventure things, he was enjoyed and it was looking.
Although many members of a magnificence (popular) voice actor were appearing on this work when considered now, it is very interesting that they were also the people to which each one who was performing a borukan & doochin brother, chairudoman, haateia, the frame heart, and azarii was also playing the leading role or the leading figure with other works to reki not to mention three persons, oofuen, kuriiou, and majiku.
In the voice magic of oofuen, the message of "- xx Killed by 00" which borukan had said well that magic including "white 刄 of light which releases self" etc.
remains in the impression even now is seen each time, and it was able to laugh at it considerably.
Such things to evaluation is "very good."

2007/02/28 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by 生物 Provider: 16797 Host:16666 Browser: 4924
When saying so, it had become oofuen って animation.
It remembers.
Since it had remarkable intensity in the original, in the picture of animation, it has already been on the verge of tears.
- which is carrying out kirakira something!!
(泣) There was nothing in if what role is usually whom when the work of き with an original is animation[ drama-izing and ]-ized, if who is what voice, a margin to care about voice about this animation, although dissatisfaction comes from such a place, etc.
Since it was an attractive work by the text, even if it takes into consideration the point that it was not for animation ...
It was hell.
Although it gets used and cooks when entering at 2 terms, why has it become like that?
It is not poor at a picture.
Although it may be 巧い rather ...
In the freshness to which a tooth shines, this work is not suited by any means.
the talk itself -- second term > -- the first term a term has admiration too much forcibly and the talk is ぐ -- it is ぐ -- it is plentifully and did not care for the time regarded as よおい which was alike, and said that it had become or has changed the line and kyara of the talk before it majiku ってあん -- as [ be / a what philanderer / it ] It is also disagreeable that there was erotic depiction vainly.
although the courage which passed an uncle's bathing scene is admired (in another meaning) -- just for a moment .
It thought that 2 terms were comparatively collected in talk, and since kyara was also approaching the original (reckless editing standard ?), it was still able to allow.
daaku of the second half -- mind -- he also liked atmosphere [ feel / languid ] comparatively ...
It has pierced through the playboy of majiku to the last.
The back, when the composition of magic was in sight, こ was good.
Is the device of such making a view of the world good?
...
It is さ although it is not visible in addition to disagreeableness and 魔術士.
Although 2 terms could be enjoyed so so and cooked, the shock of a term was the nightmare from which infernal residents also escape with bare feet.
It is this evaluation synthetically.

2007/01/17 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by raruku Provider: 1232 Host:1086 Browser: 3875
Although it was the two major magicians "sureiyaazu" and "oofuen" of the Fujimi fantasia library, was the difference in treatment very in the direction of animation ..
- OP is severe.
although it is the music prepared for まぁ oofuen -- sha -- random -- Q is not used ..
- Original change for the worse is severe.
oofuen -- such 話じゃ - - (smile) -- strangely erotic -- it is However, if it was only this, although it was still "bad", since it was made title つけて mechakucha which does not become irony in "revenge" further, either, it is "very bad." If you want to carry out gag, isn't there any じゃ with the highest peak "reckless editing" of laughter?
.
"Full meta" is very enviable truly.
For animation was never the monochrome which can be called as まぁそ and そ understood this "oofuen" って work, when reading an original.
Since the fun of oofuen was the peculiar style by Akita, a complicated world setup, and a skillful magic theory.
Is there any monochrome which leads to the dissatisfaction of such semantic じゃ animation "Fate"?

2006/06/19 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by Nokokkusu Provider: 15576 Host:15275 Browser: 4184
The work which looked at animation by chance taking advantage of having seen the preliminary announcement of the 1st talk of oofuen, and fitted in.
Animation was adding the episode of gold [ kiringu of the 2nd volume ] (although it is more interesting than the original by which deployment had become bored, the movement toward a part of battle of gold one oofuen vs kiringu is severe), and the deep dragon (a setup of a certain original organization is excluded and the story for adding reki to a friend is summarized short) of the 4th volume focusing on the 1st volume of an original.
Of course, oofuen, kuriiou, majiku, and azarii made chairudoman and haateia of turn which were play an active part in an original sharply, and were attractive of kyara, such as lock surou of an original character, raai, a shasuta daisy, and the frame heart.
reki which should have the hugest magic also had free pet-ized striped う冷遇 with the animation version.
Having changed the end of animation with the original, having bet two periods of treatment, and having made it the happy end can be evaluated.
It is regrettable that the portion with bad service of kuriiou and azarii, womanish chairudoman, etc.
also came out by JC quality.
Mr.
OP2 " was magician ?" and ED "last kiss" was quite good music.
conversely, ED2 "the method of comrades" is not likely to exist in the view of the world of the oofuen a delicate place, a "cellular phone", etc.
-- there were words Incidentally OP "love just on my love" is an order point.
Since revenge was an image from reckless editing based on gag, it is viewing and listening to it.
[ no ] Just a unicellular brother pair is enough as gag.

2006/04/05 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by 十傑集 Provider: 11009 Host:11078 Browser: 5234
although the hero had a feeling of moderate past た and the first term had him so so for everybody, the degree of original cognition spread the second term -- he is conscious -- very good -- it came to be alike [ good ] Story deployment is merit explosion of laver, although it is animation original more than a term.
It was a limitation delightful as the body which feels the badness (smile) of the character of kyara for charm.
It is sad for it to be sufficient and to carry out the magic (false space transition etc.) merely made into 秘術 of a chairudoman classroom using other magicians.

2006/02/05 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by Naooki Provider: 26281 Host:26126 Browser: 4928
it is quite interesting although looked only to the middle that brother's elder brother -- the worst -- !
(smile) っつ - or a younger brother is pitiful ...

2006/01/19 Good [Original Japanese review]
by 捲追911 Provider: 12752 Host:12378 Browser: 3875
If this work says which it is, the direction of serious serious consideration of the 1st term will regard it as the kana which was liking individually.
Although the 2nd term cannot independently be found bad.
Although animation was later seen although it thought that there was fundamental so big no dissatisfaction and it did not have serious も gag bad, either, and the original was read, since original one had the quite deep back and was interesting, supposing it entered from original one first, possibly it had become the impression which is different for a while.
mind that the direction of animation will be called kana which falls one sheet if only that [ an original's ] is interesting to be sure -- not carrying out, either -- although there is nothing, though it is one-sheet omission, oofuen of the animation version is also independently bad -- までは -- since it cannot say -- as evaluation -- as it is -- と -- the said place kana Evaluation is "good."

2005/12/25 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by 神楽坂葵 Provider: 13485 Host:13727 Browser: 5471
the common touch which is not often or bad -- it can do -- it was .
Although there was no special impression not much, it was able to be automatically regarded as さくっ.

2005/11/04 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by 陸カジキ Provider: 12246 Host:12044 Browser: 4696
It is whether the scene which was usually being seen to - and which does not bear for seeing after feeling, and there being nothing also pleasantly, there being also idly and also renewing あ - -- was also in honto very well.
-- It is the production of magic.
-- Well, it is common.

2005/10/13 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by Raibura Provider: 51573 Host:51535 Browser: 5234
Although the image of a character does not change so much compared with an original, since only it is expression like reliance and does not spread compared with an original by the touch which a magician's form says only as fire power, it is a mere magic fantasy.
having made azarii rescue into the theme -- the talk -- although it carries out, and it is a happy end numerically since [ being unavoidable ] it is an original story, as an original fan, it must be called "だろ such whose の is not oofuen ..." animation and an on-the-spot photo -- the case under the subject 2 for a way -- "-- such a motion is attached and is ぜん -- since himself of complaint たらた and others is too seen with ろ", make it which -- although it is likely to complain ...
since expectation was not carried out at all from the beginning, although there was no end disappointedly, he was not able to be enjoyed too Since it thinks that an original portion can be evaluated as it is, evaluation is "common."

2005/09/01 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by TCC Provider: 10534 Host:10651 Browser: 4184
Now, つんく率いる sharan Q completely degenerated to the negligent song producer is a theme 歌歌って better seed.
The impression was thin probably because the subject of the members of a voice actor and a theme song preceded.
You were not so much able to laugh at gag.
Was you common as a fantasy thing you?

2005/09/01 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by 向井大輔 Provider: 47481 Host:47509 Browser: 4184
It is not much pleasantly and the original was not carried out, although it did not しりま, and seen.
if there is also no impressive scene and kyara is seen -- oh, it is a thing such about an animation あっ shelf

2005/02/20 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by Niibao Provider: 35447 Host:35537 Browser: 7234
It was not likable in kyara and a fine-arts setup.
I also regarded the story as not interesting with it being individual.
but -- although it is having not got used to mind of the greatest reason "worsened" having the too deep color of a picture, and an eye's chikachika(ing) and seeing a work and becomes empty ...

2005/01/03 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by Bariru Provider: 35781 Host:35794 Browser: 4487
Although there was a portion unpleasant [ illustrating ], I think that a story, a character, and music were excellent.
It is the high evaluation which was able to be firmly drawn to the last after all.
Although there is most number of animation, isn't there little animation called the adventure fantasy of a sword and magic?
a setup of this sort is for games -- it is In such a meaning, I think that it is a fairly precious work.
Incidentally it is original non-読.

2004/09/16 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Noeru Provider: 31674 Host:31481 Browser: 3875
He likes ordinary oofuen.
there is gag, and there is also a serious scene and a battle scene and opening & ending are smart also coming out -- the opening which is revenging oneself, and is a foolish っぽい gag ばっ loan, or つんく sings -- the worst (a front is ..
although it was good) -- since it was awkward -- on the way -- it tried to come out and stopped

2004/08/10 Comment(normal) [Original Japanese review]
by Marin Provider: 30606 Host:30421 Browser: 3845
Revenge view better た.
Was after that slightly useless although the gag route by the middle stage was able to be enjoyed very well?
The talk has become sweet, although there is no help in rikorisu, if surely it does not make it such deployment whether it is said that having been made to revive has forcing 、って's which was not rikorisu but a esupe run sir.

2004/08/03 Comment(bad) [Original Japanese review]
by Hari Provider: 22446 Host:22335 Browser: 5978
Although it thinks that the whole talk was not so bad ...
Since the character and a world setup of severe [ of a picture ] and a character completely differed from the original, is it a demerit mark as an original fan?
...
Although haateia which came out with a grin between original last was regular by animation, his character is most different widely with the original...
It is wrong when having written "It is serious" by character introduction...

2004/08/03 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Sorarisu Provider: 2135 Host:2163 Browser: 4699
An original is quite interesting ^^ It strays and they are a trip and reckless editing.
straying -- a trip -- " -- my tower -- coming -- hanging down -- successor" and " -- tell my will -- 魔王" is liked For a successor, oofuen is kakkoii!!
(that is all right) 魔王 dries and its argument involving meat is interesting.
reckless editing -- " -- already give up indifferently He likes ".
(?) understands this for a while merely for [ of a blank ] five years.
I want to collect all early ^^.
I feel that the last was unclear for the place which thought in the original "is -- just for a moment." (Only me ?) After and five blank years are hips たい in detail.
It is good to take out some day -- A picture the direction of comics just for a moment -- まぁ -- although it is pleasant I wanted animation to do the place which met the original to a slight degree.
It is with how it is that reki cried the back -- (Also quality of image) Is the place which was good by animation the voice of oofuen?
(others -- it is) since it was the same as the voice of 銀次 of GB, it was surprised just for a moment Mr.
Tamotsu Morihisa -- w

2004/07/19 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Ragunaroku Provider: 42401 Host:42291 Browser: 3875
The voice of oofuen is very good, although this read the original book and this was seen.
It is voice as I have already considered in the original.
Although the place where the story very well different from an original was contained was also good, there was also a portion I want you to unite with an original.

Next / Post your review / Top page

Other media
Novel:Majutu si o-fen

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.