Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Anime ranking: Rank 2,543/in 2,689 titles (Total -15.84/Deviation 45.46) Rank 2,542 <= => Rank 2,544
Anime average points ranking: Rank 1,217/in 1,398 titles (Average -0.44(Good)/Deviation 37.87) Rank 1,216 <= => Rank 1,218 (more than 10 evaluatoin)

THE LION KING(Anime)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Goods
(DVD)

Latest DVD: 2008/07/01 ():

Care Bears: King of the Moon $98

DVD(72hit) Sales/Latest					VHS(65hit) Sales/Latest	Books(772hit) Sales/Latest	Toys(462hit) Sales/Latest	Music(175hit) Sales/Latest	VideoGames(20hit) Sales/Latest
Rank:112 The Lion King (Disney Special Platinum Edition) Tag:$99 2003/10/07 () Eval.:***** 1.Defective DVD, does not play, Still waiting for response on replacement over 1 month later!	Rank:1040 Mulan (Special Edition) Tag:$99 2004/10/26 () Eval.:***** 1.OME OF DISNEY'S FINEST ANIMATED FEATURE FILMS!	Rank:1123 Bambi (2-Disc Special Platinum Edition) Tag:$99 2005/03/01 () Eval.:***** 1.Classic Movie	Rank:1284 The Lion in Winter Tag:$98 2001/06/19 () Eval.:***** 1.Even better the fourth time!	Rank:1671 Dead Zone: The Final Season Tag:$98 2008/06/03 () Eval.:***** 1.DEAD ZONE; THE FINAL SEASON	Rank:1 VHS Tape:The Lion King (A Walt Disney Masterpiece) Tag:$99 1995/03/03 () Eval.:***** 1.Defective DVD, does not play, Still waiting for response on replacement over 1 month later!	Rank:14113 Hardcover:Disney CD The Lion King, the Little Mermaid, Toy Story, Aladdin: Disney Cd Storybook (4-in... Tag:$95 2004/04 () Eval.:***** 1.Disney CD	Rank:2753 Toy:Vtech - V.Smile - the Lion King Tag:$99 2006/06/12 () Eval.:***** 1.Cute but not for a five-year-old	Rank:756 Audio CD:The Lion King (1997 Original Broadway Cast) Tag:$98 1997/11/14 () Eval.:***** 1.Love it!!!	Rank:1760 Video Game:Disney Friends Tag:$99 2008/03/04 () Eval.:***** 1.fun ame

Information about this title

Jonathan Taylor Thomas Matthew Broderick James Earl Jones Jeremy Irons Whoopi Goldberg
Cheech Marin Jim Cummings

Official sites
1. http://www.disney.co.jp/movies/lionking/ (Translation)

Image gallery sites
1. http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~ys9m-ymgt/1994/1994-116.html

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	AnimeRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Good(-0.44)	2,543	45.46	-15.84

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	24,088	42	36
Outside Japan	448	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

2.8%

5.6%

27.8%

5.6%

25.0%

Added percentage

2.8%

8.4%

36.2%

64%

69.6%

75.2%

100%

Summary

36.2%

27.8%

36.2%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 4 3 2 1 31 30 29 28
7 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 3

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/03/19 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by PACLI Provider: 14626 Host:14535 Browser: 10542

[Bad point]
However it may see this which is allowed even if Disney who must be noisy plagiarizes various things on copyright, it can be called complaint etc.
Japanese people .
Japan which I want to raise and refuse voice more -- the Disney movie -- if a similar movie is made, Disney should complain rightly It pats to a thing and is ?.
A Japanese spectator does not raise voice.
Why doesn't it refuse Disney?
I do not understand.

2008/01/19 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Bakaboke Provider: 29382 Host:29397 Browser: 7783(Mobile)
Do you think that growth of hero shinba was drawn carefully, said as it is well, and was a work?
Did the neighborhood which comes [ both ] into contact with other animals by Nature, grows, serves as a strong brawny lion at the end, and returns to a group remain in the impression?
although detailed contents, the story, etc.
memorized and it did not become precocious in about [ which looked at this work at once considerably at ancient times ], since growth of a hero remained in the impression considerably, evaluation is good -- coming out -- 。

2007/10/18 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Merci Provider: 22279 Host:22412 Browser: 4184
Well, is it a problem precedent to the evaluation so and so as a work like you?
It is the minimum as a maker and sushi and nature have not become.
Those days, the Disney side was carrying out the comment of having not heard " "the jungle Great" etc." (although the player of starring knew existence of the "jungle Great").
they are what and a well impolite lie -- things However it may do, it will not move at the time of the soul from the "worst." Although but "jungle Great" is not known on real time.
However, I also regard kyara as Leo's being dearer than shinba.
a screen -- overall -- tea -- し it is sexy and is not beautiful The "jungle Great" who made the point and the lion white thinks that he is uncanny.
Although he gets angry in the "theatrical company four seasons" which stage-ized this movie.
The pride to Japanese culture is かねぇ which is not ...
if this work is seen anyhow -- a title -- getting angry -- coming out -- deeply -- と -- what to say comes out However, also impudently, it is 作っちゃってるもん in a sequel etc.
well.
if it considers, "Atlantis" etc.
will be a forerunner perversion doubt [ a series of ] reason -- this work The "worst" is attached for the time being.

2007/07/27 Good [Original Japanese review]
by 金龍 Provider: 660 Host:428 Browser: 5234
It is not a disagreeable work.
Even if it is merely asked whether to be a favorite work, yes cannot generally be said.
It is the type especially whose pakuri does not care about me.
an interesting thing is interesting when it will be pakuri -- carrying out -- trash a trash -- I think that nothing essentially changes after all Although it is that pakuri is not good well after consenting also to 100 -- The story was not disagreeable probably.
Child shinba of mufuasa overcame a father's death and was intelligibly collected in the talk of achieving revenge of a father.
Is this the strong point common to the Disney movie?
There was also no depiction as animation bad.
It is not necessary to say that change interest was quickly drawn by the death of mufuasa, a debt of sukaa, and deployment.
although this talk itself is the world of one animal called a lion, since [ moreover, ] a close resemblance [ situation / of being also human society and getting ] is borne -- a certain meaning -- this is not an overstatement even if it calls it the work showing man I think that Timon and punba had made use of the character.
It is a talk in the inside of Disney's variety show kyara.
Although variety show kyara of other animation will be lost a little, it won in the margin only with the height of a tension.
I also regard this work with a strong serious color as the ability to have seen without putting in the power of the shoulder, thanks to them.
but a certain meaning -- it is only it It remained in the impression.
-- I think that it is a delicate work.
However, in the Disney movie, it was thought that it was the work which is not bad.

2006/10/26 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by m11 Provider: 21547 Host:21658 Browser: 3875
Only 1 is seen.
It was likable in a story or kyara and was often looking.
The psychology of shinba and growth were expressed well and it was interesting.

2006/08/19 Comment(normal) [Original Japanese review]
by kinji Provider: 8320 Host:8382 Browser: 4483
Probably, it will be better to evaluate, once it has already reseen, since memory was ambiguous, although were considerably influenced of the jungle Great and it was not necessarily boring.
Incidentally, since it is Bambi's pakuri, the jungle Great is Mr.
each other.
And since it was unauthorized to Disney and Bambi was picture-book-ized, Tezuka is さ.

2006/06/25 Comment(bad) [Original Japanese review]
by 宇宙刑事ジャンギャバン Provider: 33223 Host:33285 Browser: 4314
Does the player who applied the voice of animals use the fairly famous person?
Jeremy Irons is performing [ the lion which entrapped 1 of three hyenas, and a hero's father ] with Whoopi Goldberg, an Oscar actor, respectively.
A hero's role of a father was Mr.
James Earl Jones who performed dozen beedaa by Star Wars once.
With this ....
It is if it is not pakuri of the Tezuka work ...

2006/05/26 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by Hansu Provider: 20228 Host:20345 Browser: 3646
Although it saw and pakuri っぽい was thought immediately, only the part which greets a simple and intelligible happy end was able to be seen more happily than jungle Great Leo.
(It will be because an enemy was not man) Probably, evaluation was made into the "highest" when there was no fact of pakuri.
I think that it was the high animation of it 位質.

2006/05/26 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Miruguru Provider: 467 Host:552 Browser: 6287
Although got to know for the first time, since this jungle Great Leo is not known, jungle Great Leo's pakuri can be said [ no ] about pakuri.
Privately, was it quite good?
a thing with too uncanny BGM -- if it comes out of a word, and it is peevish and is called Disney, since it will be music I say that the talk is common or think that it was legible well in taking a father's enmity.
It was also good that laughter was able to be enough taken in 2 person groups of punba with Timon.
Is evaluation good?
Since pakuri was not known and next 2 and 3 were enjoyed.

2006/05/26 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by 新真那 Provider: 13869 Host:14206 Browser: 6342
Although it was the work which it is called jungle Great Leo's pakuri and will be accepted and to name, it was able to be laughed that it was unexpected.
In the pair of that wild boar and bird, it is especially.
Although it is the talk that constructing a hand cannot have a hyena and a lion, either, a younger brother applies an elder brother to a hand.
Is also lion society hard to live?
It was the deployment which is likely to appear in history.
However, it is not only dark, but I think that it was good that there was also a gag-element perfectly.
Since it is not interesting only by it being dark much.
But the last is the deployment [ like ] which can be answered if damaged after all.
it can say that seemingly it is an American work, takes into pieces, and is -- it is .
However, a king's world is whether realized in a lion.

2006/03/26 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Akki Provider: 26526 Host:26554 Browser: 4317
it was paku り作品 of the "jungle Great" -- it is ...
I want to separate completely and to consider it that for the time being Since it was the seen first Disney work when small, it remains very impressively.
The first OP is very visionary and has some which also sound a song at the heart.
It is not an overstatement even if it calls it the body with which this music also received the long-term seller in the theatrical company four seasons.
Now, the work which mainly drew growth of shinba too although it was an important story.
He who experienced sublime separation with father mufuasa leaves for the unknown ground so that it may escape from reality.
Although it seems that shinba is living fortunately here, if it carries out from the position called the king and lion of 100 beasts, they will be misery and the animal itself which lost instinct and was degenerated when saying bad.
Although it is deployment with "love", that is, quite satisfactory force and the reason used as the cause which calls back shinba to the ground of a prairie does not become precocious, at last, his figure which becomes desperate is touch called the bottom of recovery of the figure of a lion, and thinks that it was very smart.
I think that fighting with the hyena and others of the final stage made instinct of a lion open, and was very often drawing the figure of grown-up shinba.
And the figure of his last which has held the father and the image of mufuasa was divine, and was that very powerful.
However, it is at a sequel not having been made.
I think that it can fully be satisfied only with this one work.

2006/03/21 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Ebodainohiraki Provider: 5898 Host:6011 Browser: 6287
Out of the question!
If a picture will be beautiful however, a story will be moving however, music will be wonderful however and it will be noted performance however ...
This work is a problem precedent to it!
As a creator, it has carried out that it must not do by any means.
It can be convinced if it is called a remake.
Since it is the area of strength of this work company ...
Almost all works are the things which converted the masterpiece in the world into a video signal.
The skill is accepted.
But however who may look at this, it is a copy work.
himself who thought ...
by no means and has seen is deplorable ...
such a thing is not related, if the original work will be a masterpiece and it will be 愚作 -- it is -- !
Even if it is the work which can be however regarded as boring, the creator is trying hard constantly squeezing out the original setup.

2006/02/12 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by Poyon Provider: 1017 Host:1113 Browser: 4696
Since it was a child when he saw, he fairly liked.
since -- it was honesty surprise that evaluation here is low like this however, circle pakuri of the Tezuka work -- being true by no means, although surely it is visible so ...
It is paku る about the work of the cartoonist who represents Japan surely although it is Disney for whom 1000, a 1000-fathom affair, etc.
have and it did not seldom care!
Can't pakuri be allowed although he fairly liked at the time of a child?
Common by saying.

2006/02/11 Good [Original Japanese review]
by alt Provider: 4534 Host:4377 Browser: 3650
へえ -- it was - pakuri -- it is -- since there is no story 知 and others of the thing-heard-of-for-the-first-time jungle Great -- the は置い through which it does not pass -- it is -- which looked at 2 at the time of -- hama った junior high school student who looked at 1 at the time of an elementary school -- which looked at three several petty days ago -- so so -- interesting Synthesizing by the てな reason, evaluation is at "it is good."

2006/02/05 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Matsu Provider: 36407 Host:36422 Browser: 3846
Has even one to 3 work come out for the moment?
Zia-ul-Haq - na matata -♪ don't care -- it does not kuyokuyo -- 呪文 of the magic which is happily useful in life ...
he fairly likes this song

2006/02/05 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Naooki Provider: 26281 Host:26126 Browser: 4928
completely interesting [ at first ] as a schoolchild -- cut and see to a younger sister -- it was fairly interesting, when obtaining and saying and seeing surely -- Lion King 2 -- a hero -- son 8 た of 1 -- ず 8 -- it is たかな

2005/10/21 Comment(bad) [Original Japanese review]
by 634 Provider: 13637 Host:13330 Browser: 5234
There was a lion called shinba truly.
Although he has forgotten the detailed numerical value in the male lion kept in the zoo in the United States a long time ago, in the lion kept, it was the holder of record that the body is the largest.
However, I think it the insult of the lion of not only Osamu Tezuka but wildness, disagreeableness, and the whole cat family animal that the lion made to grow fat in a zoo by 豚みたい of a hoggery was appointed as the leading role of such animation.
Seemingly, Seton's "account of an animal" currently incidentally read well in Japan will be so much unpopular in the United States of the home.
It is said that the scene which the animals currently drawn on the account of an animal start a wild rule or man's hand, and accomplishes the tragic last moment was not popular with the United States exclusively supporting a happy end.
Even if it thinks from the point, is truly this the Disney work with a shallow bottom, and an opportunism U.S.
movie?

2005/10/21 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by クックック〜 Provider: 8909 Host:9046 Browser: 5234
The animation of the concept said like this is a great abhorrence.
Pleasantly [ what ] and when it did not understand at all, the place where a strange setup may also be mixed was not able to be found.
Although it thinks well that it is quite difficult to look for a good part from disagreeable animation ...

2005/09/10 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Bubu Provider: 34728 Host:34575 Browser: 3646
Although it was a jungle Great lover as a child (way of comics), the quality of animation was low and was almost looking at it as "neta." Although Lion King was the jungle Great's adaptation clearly, the dissatisfaction to which time and effort and spare time are applied and which was felt for the jungle Great until now was canceled.
the head family which the taste of Japanese animation which now was lost, such as a motion and gag, is brushed up, and should be called Tezuka's root -- I think that Disney's temper appeared as touch -- "-- is it the wind [ saying like this wanted to make and ] しょ Tezuka Mr."?
Since the work of this level was seen whatever it might be, when it would be plagiarism, since it had given up on the skill of making Said Tezuka's animation as me, it is satisfaction.
I think that it is a severe betrayal to show a low nature work even if it is the company of an original author side, attracting the visitor by the merit which can do an original.
-> jungle Great and the third pass.

2005/09/10 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by 634 Provider: 19915 Host:19728 Browser: 5234
As [ be / disreputable / too / ...
/ at pakuri of the "jungle Great" ] It shook in Disney and only the performance priority principles of not mattering were conspicuous with the pakuri work.
It is 持っちゃった about the hostility heart to Disney and jiburi in the authentic target which it will be from this work.
It unzari(ed) to a cheap setup with the easy story, and did not leave high evaluation ......

Next / Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.