Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Anime ranking: Rank 2,509/in 2,717 titles (Total -9.00/Deviation 46.22) Rank 2,508 <= => Rank 2,510

BAMBI(Anime)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Goods
(DVD)

Latest DVD: 2008/10/07 ():

Sleeping Beauty (Two-Disc Platinum Edition) $99

DVD(75hit) Sales/Latest						VHS(104hit) Sales/Latest	Books(950hit) Sales/Latest	Toys(123hit) Sales/Latest	Music(80hit) Sales/Latest
Rank:1 Sleeping Beauty (Two-Disc Platinum Edition) Tag:$99 2008/10/07 () Eval.:***** 1.A True Masterpiece	Rank:63 The Lion King (Disney Special Platinum Edition) Tag:$99 2003/10/07 () Eval.:***** 1.The Lion King	Rank:78 Beauty and the Beast Tag:$99 2002/10/08 () Eval.:***** 1.Beauty and the Beast	Rank:79 Cinderella (Two-Disc Special Edition) Tag:$99 2005/10/04 () Eval.:***** 1.Pure Disney Magic	Rank:104 The Little Mermaid (Two-Disc Platinum Edition) Tag:$99 2006/10/03 () Eval.:***** 1.What A Joy!	Rank:123 Aladdin (Disney Special Platinum Edition) Tag:$99 2004/10/05 () Eval.:***** 1.Great family film	Rank:1791 VHS Tape:Bambi II Tag:$99 2006/02/07 () Eval.:***** 1.OK	Rank:4559 Kindle Edition:The Jungle Book & Second Jungle Book (Complete) Tag:$99 2007/12/21 () Eval.:***** 1.Great	Rank:14837 Toy:Disney Exclusive 7 Piece Mini PVC Bambi Collector Set Tag:$99	Rank:3125 Audio CD:Cinderella Tag:$98 2005/10/04 () Eval.:***** 1.cinderalla

Information about this title

Walt Disney

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	AnimeRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Very bad(-1.80)	2,509	46.22	-9.00

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	8,574	6	5
Outside Japan	598	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

0.0%

20.0%

0.0%

60.0%

20.0%

Added percentage

20%

80%

100%

Summary

20.0%

80%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3
6 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 1

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) All
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	All

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/02/02 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by 石鯉 Provider: 12212 Host:12486 Browser: 8090
I think that it will advise from the position which is criticized considerably severely and which comes out, is peevish and is different in ...
of wanting to see A picture is very beautiful although it is 本作.
About honesty and this point, I think that it is above the latest poor animation.
To be sure, it may be a problem to think an image as important too much and to neglect [ that it is negligent ] others completely well.
Merely, since the picture of only this was drawn with the work of 50 years or more ago, I think that it is enough 価(ed) to praise.
I regard only the animation which towers even above something in consideration of telling it that animation of those days was still a development way that will be solved, and to say as it having admired enough.
Evaluation of a "good" more than still is not attached.
と -- since it cannot be overlooked that the talk carried out thin くなって also of also saying, and it waited compared with the original as human being of the position since I had read the original novel Therefore, an image is considered as plus, a story is added as minus, and influence evaluation is "common."

2006/06/05 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by 新真那 Provider: 803 Host:705 Browser: 6342
It goes into a disagreeable work by だん and つ also in the Disney work.
The contents are severe anyhow.
It is thin and is not interesting.
Although it thinks it good that the animal which comes out is pretty, it will be suspected that the contents may have been made by the basis of the secret design for the loveliness to receive only the contents conversely only appearance.
It does not have the room of doubt that the beauty of a picture is in one in which Disney deals.
It is a question whether although this work is for children, a child sees and it is thought that it is interesting very much.

2006/05/28 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Edei Provider: 13471 Host:13265 Browser: 4483
It is the worst among the Disney work.
Although "chicken little" also carried out the fairly unpleasant thought, this "Bambi" is the animation of the series worst.
"Toy Story" is, although [ having become a student ] saw happily even now, and "a king's sword" was having growth of magic or ワーto drawn and was interesting.
This is for children.
it is also aiming at perfect infancy -- しか -- it does not think the situation that Bambi's mother is shot dead by man and Bambi grows is also expressing man's ugliness frankly -- しか -- it could not consider, but the scene which beats an ill-tempered deer was also nonchalantly advertized as "an honest person can win an ill-tempered person", and shone, and it was really disagreeable Probably, but joke could be put in just for a moment.
Even if a mountain becomes a conflagration thing, it is boring for that only Bambi survives to read the point.
I will want to recommend you other Disney works, if it says which it is.

2006/05/28 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by 634 Provider: 20897 Host:21004 Browser: 5234
After all, it is the Disney work.
What is not impressed by the idea of a happy end anything, and it is nothing [ degree ] of favorable impression also to a character.
Although it is easy to say by the mouth, "An animal is dear", an animal is made into a marchen, and even if those to whom making it opportunism knows neither nature nor a wild animal well can deceive, they cannot deceive people who are not so.
For the first time in [ of the Disney work / a low level ] still continues, and it is continuing being disregarded that a happy end has many worlds which do not go, and "it is not said that the protection of nature must not keep such the marchen world." It should not be connected in a keyword called animal protection and the protection of nature with such a work something, either.
A dream cannot be felt, even if a lack [ the contents of 本作 ] is telling completeness and feels puerility for 創りすぎている所 for small children above all.
It thinks that the badness of 本作 is the problem that such puerility and chachi さ are first, there is also no fun which looks at a portion called the charm [ with which the image of chachi さ, therefore 本作 and animation called animation work hid ], and producer's hard struggle back, the ancient times of the meaning, meaning, and theme nature of U.S.
animation work are also still thin compared with Japan or a foreign country, and the impression does not change.
Is that the prejudice of the work of mere child's play etc.
in animation has been born from this work an overstatement?

2005/11/18 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by TCC Provider: 10534 Host:10814 Browser: 4184
↓ to which Kojika is born in a certain woods -- the Kojika is named Bambi, only も彼 which is attacked by man's hunter when it is together with ↓ which Mr.
Oji and nickname are attached and is fortunately passed with animals, such as a squirrel and a skunk, however 母鹿, and escapes from the merit of the dignity is saved, and 母鹿 is shot dead ↓ -- Bambi who overcame the death and grew -- woods -- returning -- animals and reunion ↓ -- も which confronts with the ill-tempered deer which encountered beautiful 雌鹿 and loved the same her -- it brilliant-beats and is connected While ↓ which gets separate, and she induce the baby deer between Bambi soon while the fire broke out in ↓, however woods and Bambi had missed her, and Bambi watches it in the distance, they are ji- and ...........
"あ - Although it was such a flow generally, meet.
then -- having been good .
" was the first impression.
since it is for children, although day zunii animation (the work which tale-ized the talk and the actual fairy tale of a mikkii mouse is ........
although it thinks that an adult can also enjoy himself) is boorish, it is straight -- elapsing -- thin く -- it was a tsumaran thing simply [ of saying such a thing ] It is the same that there are no contents only by appearance being good well rather than the candid mere-child's-play-work which is spreading recently although it is mashi.

2005/10/10 Comment(normal) [Original Japanese review]
by 向井大輔 Provider: 33765 Host:33622 Browser: 4184
Although a comment is managed since the work is not seen, seemingly, it is that this work is uncanny to have described not imagination but the genuine article deer.

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.