Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Anime ranking: Rank 2,580/in 2,689 titles (Total -21.83/Deviation 44.73) Rank 2,579 <= => Rank 2,581
Anime average points ranking: Rank 1,248/in 1,399 titles (Average -0.59(Bad)/Deviation 36.31) Rank 1,247 <= => Rank 1,249 (more than 10 evaluatoin)
Anime ranking of 1997: Rank 47/in 50 titles Rank 46 <= => Rank 48

Doctor Slamp(Anime)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

Other media
Comics:Dr. Slump / Novel:Dr Slump

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Information about this title

Akira Toriyama Shigeyasu Yamauchi
Satoru Nishizono Yamamuronaoyoshi
Tsujitadanao Kunio Tsujita
Funta TOEI ANIMATION (Toei Doga) TOEI ANIMATION CO., LTD Fuji Television TOEI
Taeko Kawata Yuusaku Yara Chie Ishibashi Yuko Minaguchi
Shinichiro Ohta Megumi Urawa Hiroko Konishi Motoko Kumai
Bin Shimada Ryo Horikawa Noriko Uemura Houko Kuwashima
Toru Furuya

Released:1997/11/26 in Japan End:1999/09/29 in Japan

Official sites
1. http://www.toei-anim.co.jp/lineup/tv/arale_2nd/ (Translation)

Image gallery sites
1. Dr Slump

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	AnimeRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Bad(-0.59)	2,580	44.73	-21.83

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	43,860	45	37
Outside Japan	477	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

8.1%

5.4%

10.8%

27.0%

18.9%

2.7%

27.0%

Added percentage

8.1%

13.5%

24.3%

51.3%

70.2%

72.9%

100%

Summary

24.3%

27.0%

48.6%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 31
3 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) All
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	All

Post your review / Top page

Other media
Comics:Dr. Slump / Novel:Dr Slump

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/07/11 Best! [Original Japanese review]
by Abonrii Provider: 12995 Host:13059 Browser: 7395
Although it falls a little compared with the original version, he likes also here.
Although the voice of arare was worrisome for a while, I think that the other voice is satisfactory.
Although it thinks that it has improved on the whole, it has just been going to finish the only dissatisfied point halfway.

2008/03/07 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by CRQ Provider: 6611 Host:6754 Browser: 3875
Although the doctor slump of the Heisei version was not an all story, it was seen.
Although the point which is the Showa version that scenery, the pattern, etc.
changed was seen when compared, it saw without seldom caring.
My arare is an energyful of a girl.
Did he run about here and there [ of a village ]?
It was individually useless that arare merely sometimes did a vulgar act.
Was the other pleasant character including arare?
Performance of the voice actor was satisfied.
Do you remember the theme song even now?
Was it a dress after this finished surely?
Although a doctor slump is also good, as me, he likes the dragon ball.
since evaluation also has the scene and the not seen talk of a vulgar act -- 1 rank 下げて -- suppose that it is common

2007/11/30 Best! [Original Japanese review]
by Sharu Provider: 1407 Host:1256 Browser: 5598
When I was a junior high school student, it is the work to which it was viewing and listening without missing.
time it is young -- a previous work -- although viewed and listened to a version in what talk, I regard the fun as skillful く活 or せていた especially sense of incongruity was not moved by the voice of each character, either -- carrying out -- overall -- illustrating -- a color setup became deep and the field also had the impression which is easy to see although the touch which lacked in grace a little carried out OP-ED music -- highness -- since it was tension touch, it was a good impression In respect of contents, although seldom felt, story nature and theme nature were very interesting, and were seen, and its noisy farce to which the individual characters who considered as the start weave my arare was thrilling, and was able to enjoy them very much.
There is a little vulgar field, and imprudently, with it being bright, by positive and the high tension, gag is sharp and a style also regards や tempo as wonderful.
an original comic -- non-読 -- it is -- and a previous work -- although a version was not viewing and listening to not much many numbers of talks, either, I thought that it was the work which is seen and was able to be enjoyed very much The point which can be enjoyed in comfort thinks that it is a big charm of this work, without considering a difficult thing.
Story deployment is also intelligible, and since it is a high tension brightly, if it is looking, I will think that it is the work which can become fine.
Since it thought that especially the point that is looking and thought was dissatisfied was the work which there is nothing and can be enjoyed easily, evaluation is made into the "highest."

2007/11/30 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by Bakaboke Provider: 29382 Host:29397 Browser: 7783(Mobile)
Was it the Toriyama work broadcast by the next of GT?
animation of a type or -- which was alike although it was worried about what does a dragon ball finish and next does -- disappointedly -- it is not -- although -- it applied to freshness However, the gag of a arare my world was interesting too, and the remake by the new members of a voice actor had the very much good touch.
It was also early that the part weariness came but well -- Evaluation is usually about.

2007/11/30 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Ebodainohiraki Provider: 1434 Host:1325 Browser: 8643
I think that it is the pitiable work which was obliged to evaluation severe for this frame broadcast without the device of a key office.
FUJI TV has repeated the methods (Mr.
Fujihiko Hosono's "猿飛" true -> "Gu-Gu ganmo" and true "touch" -> "per 陽 is good!" etc.) of continuing and broadcasting the same author's work till now.
[ of Mr.
Mitsuru Adachi ] In addition, even if short unlike the one-period-of-treatment broadcast by which TV animation of those days occupies the mainstream now, that it is broadcast that two periods of treatment are was almost the case.
If it is the same author, or the thing of the same style is continued and it is broadcast, although a minimum audience rating may be being able to take, I think that the phenomenon surely referred to as "it will 飽き bored" and "comparing" will occur.
本作 is the remake work broadcast without vacating after the "dragon ball series" end which is this author's work broadcast for ten years or more, and between following on the predecessor work in which absolute presence is shown.
Even if it sees this from layman's appraisal, it thinks that it is the way of not having an art very much.
If 本作 from which memory of a previous work was halfway arranged by modern style where the Toriyama world is further planted in the televiewer in the state of remaining firmly, firmly appears, I will carry out what and will think earnestly that rejection comes out.
Therefore, wasn't a result into which evaluation is divided too much brought in the televiewer layer which knows the predecessor, and the televiewer layer which knew the work called "Dr.SLUMP" for the first time by 本作?
since it is the generation in whom I was also completely soaked in the predecessor -- the time of full-service broadcasting of 本作 -- the hairstyle of "tarou -- 違うっ -- " -- "っ with the green's insufficient sex appeal" -- it had complained very well simultaneously, a style -- it was the work of the type which does not need to flatter a time-like -- it carries out and I am natural about the voice actor of 本作 -- although there was sense of incongruity, since there was no such dissatisfaction and it did not think that the same way as a predecessor should also perform those days, I regarded the part also as kana - which should not have fought ordinarily to heta at いじくらず If 15-year or more thing years had passed, since it would think that the same performance cannot be expected with the same vocal quality, and there is then also no meaning of a remake, I wanted to enjoy 本作 as 本作.
A predecessor's image is surely too large and I think that it was a rather difficult thing in that time.
The place which began to look at 本作 recently re-broadcast by the cable TV, and the sense of incongruity felt till now have seemed not to be what is as much, either.
The hairstyle of my arare who is very polite (since a time is different a certain meaning although it is natural ...) and by whom the bodies, such as sushi and a character, and the original were also drawn smoothly etc.
also regards illustrating as the direction of 本作 being drawn faithfully rather.
本作 to which it viewed and listened after a predecessor's impression faded is a very ordinary superior work, and even if it takes, it thinks that it has done pleasantly.
I think that the point (= thing performed for the halfway arrangement) is very wasteful.
Since an arrangement will hang prejudice from the beginning, it will become impossible, as for the halfway half end said like this for the layer which supports a predecessor, to also surely notice the charm of a certain 本作 very much naturally.
if it is original, as there is "demon Taro of gegege" their activity from which it is alike and a background and character are different little by little in the broadcast time to see, you should view and listen also to 本作 to the appearance, although are kicked and it is ...
Those who had looked at the predecessor on real time when young himself who piled up age clearly looks at a work from what angle, feels fun for the place said how, and feels 粗 -- remake work って of the type which will be set at the point since it is the husband who can cut and can notice things and to say -- I think that it is interesting As for the remake work in the name which is the work which only inherited a part of name and is completely different, it is also very much pleasant to see, while how to catch to here is different and the same himself also considers according to age, since it is different.
It will say that the result of 本作 was not bad and became the age when it became impossible he to already enjoy the work said like this, if it still cannot admit.
it is not the thing [ have ] with things say and completely bad for which a remake work is received -- carrying out -- things って -- since it thinks that it is what is said right [ that ] -- it -- then -- although it thinks that it is good, it is a problem not to sacredness-ize a predecessor work beyond necessity, or not to accept existence of 本作 at all a little -- considering .
Since having been firmly accepted in the new fan is the fact which complications do not have, either even if it sees from the height of the audience rating which can be called passing mark ...

2007/07/19 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by Meteo Provider: 19923 Host:20016 Browser: 3162
It carries out too much in a small way, and is [ what and ] だ.
a previous work -- for the first time in [ みたいなは playful ちゃ ] is completely insufficient Did it do newly?
However, since there was no portion for which especially a belly is formed, it is common.
However, that green teacher is not accepted until he dies.

2007/02/23 Best! [Original Japanese review]
by 鳥山ファン Provider: 31202 Host:31146 Browser: 4184
my arare of the role of arare of Ms.
remade doctor slump Taeko Kawada was better than the first Dr.
slump -- I --DVD-sell or want you to rent I want to see once again.
Seemingly, 孫悟空 of a dragon ball will also come out.
Thank you for your consideration.
It is DVD-ized hope.
Do you try to want to arare my revive by the after Toriyama Mr.
latest work?
It is super-pleasure when it is the movie of a dress this year, and a simultaneous show.
Thank you for your consideration.
I want you to DVD-ize.

2007/01/13 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by 何 Provider: 6112 Host:5990 Browser: 3875
He was very favorite and did this animation.
But early my arare was seen, and since the voice actor was completely different, it was surprised.
To be sure, the voice actor has the same good one as the first stage.
but since the Toriyama 明先生 was doing the character design, it was [ ^^ ] good the middle -- 悟空 -- it came out and was surprised uncanny at the time of あん -- I think [!!
] that it was impressed

2006/08/17 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by HUNGRY SPIDER Review history[Good:2(40%) Normal:1(20%) Bad:2(40%)] / Provider: 4807 Host:4512 Browser: 7395
Since it does not know, previous works are comment at the viewpoint.
If simple, I think that deka さ of the impact of an insertion song had a colander thing for the children who do not know a previous work (as it being another whether the view of the world of "my arare" is matched).
Himself who was gakincho which neither the right nor the left understands at the time of televising large-roared with laughter obediently in that song, and has remembered that classmates were also so.
a child is simple if it considers now -- it can extract in a complex thing etc., can come out, and can laugh However, that it also seldom took time that I notice "It is not interesting if it thinks well" and fact.
Although it is, are lower neta's being weak, that is, the reason whose heat dropped suddenly the dullness of gag, and the platitude of a story too essentially?
Although it is repetition じゃ of neta which was alike each time, and a child (since it is a child ?), it 飽きs bored truly.
Although just the invention was different, し [ neta of mashirito was also much the same and it considered it at least to "moreover, you" ].
It is clear to have held sleepiness even if it was not Sazae-San or the thing to which it wears out and my まる子 feels displeasure.
Probably it was only a theme song that whose impact was strong when very thought, and the contents were not trifling things.
Because looking for the memory at which it laughed from the contents runs into difficulties this much and it shines.
My comment which are outsiders do not go to the part which does not simply result in the displeasure which "was not interesting as for this although the degree of reappearance of the masterpiece of the Toriyama 明 was not known" a word, and the "worst" noting that I leave blame of a fine place to other you.

2006/08/17 Comment(bad) [Original Japanese review]
by Achii Provider: 30378 Host:30186 Browser: 4483
Although he did not remember too, he was well ordinary animation.
Country っぽさ had come out.
Was the previous work individually more sociable (he does not remember here too)?
Although suited about voice, the front was good too.
Although Mr.
Kawada is not guilty at all, if my arare's voice is not Mr.
Koyama too ...
There is a memory about which a green teacher's kyaradeza was too different from the previous work, and was disappointed.
It was the work regarded as the members of a voice actor which were appearing on the members of a voice actor of a previous work and this being pitiful.

2006/07/20 Comment(bad) [Original Japanese review]
by 宇宙刑事ジャンギャバン Provider: 33223 Host:33285 Browser: 4314
Or [ that it will be the work made for whom on earth ].
although it is useless when neither Mr.
Koyama nor Mr.
Utsumi has participated probably, drawing changed too much with the original and some characters have turned into another person No.
28 truly -- it is incomprehensible and they are only the theme songs which do not suit the work world at all -- such 怪作 was produced why

2006/05/17 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by 五十嵐真紀 Provider: 11739 Host:11664 Browser: 3875
Well, it may be a work vulgar to be sure.
In those who know the previous work, it is 今作 with fairly much disrepute (since I do not have having seen the previous work, I do not know).
However, wasn't 今作 fairly good, either?
While being broadcast, like Conan, it did not try not to miss every week, but I did and videotape recording was also carried out at the time of going out.
It is the cause which was regarded as my arare and Dr mashirito being met again and my arare being evaluated while carrying out the game of "jump super stars." It was a ぼっちゃ man that was individually favorite.
(Why is it?) The talk is placed well.
as well as ancient times, since it is the contents which can be enjoyed even if it sees now, evaluation is very good -- coming out -- 。

2006/04/27 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by Rimi Provider: 9708 Host:9606 Browser: 4184
Since he liked my arare, it heard that new work was broadcast and saw.
The previous work was more interesting positively and disappointment was not able to be hidden.
Although a few also had the place at which it was able to laugh, it becomes having become less boring [ try ] from the neighborhood whose original increased at the time of the first stage.
kyaradeza was useless the back.
Beauty more form kyara, such as tarou, are another person in the green or dirt, and neither my gatt nor piisuke was received, although there was no sense of incongruity not much.
I think that there was no necessity of changing kyaradeza.
There is also no fine production which suited the previous work, and it was seldom able to laugh also at gag by restless story deployment.
Since there is also a place at which it was able to laugh, a few is attached to psychological dependence.

2006/04/27 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by tfc Provider: 11456 Host:11659 Browser: 6287
This time is not quite satisfactory although the front was good.
It is made "bad" and the evaluation at which something cannot laugh is gained, although he wants to make it "very bad."

2006/03/24 Comment(bad) [Original Japanese review]
by Edei Provider: 13471 Host:13265 Browser: 7870
the animation impressed with "the comics of the Toriyama 明 should not remake" Mr.
1000 Hyoe, a green teacher, and an end are another person also with entire blue general and ninja purple of a red ribbon army.
It is to become severe to there, if it redraws on modern style...
It is full of an already mortifying feeling that such a work decorated of his death [ of the animation of the Toriyama 明 ].

2006/03/18 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by Gannaa Provider: 36406 Host:36490 Browser: 3646
boring, even if it is looking, since the voice actor has been changed before graphics, although the graphics regarded as it being natural that sense of incongruity comes out are comparatively beautiful, if it is the person on whom quality has fallen considerably and who looked at ancient times' when the voice actor who is not likable will total-change to my arare of this one somehow, if my arare of a previous work is seen -- it has become Are also OP and ED clear and carry out the power down of the previous work being better all fields?

2006/03/18 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Edei Provider: 13471 Host:13265 Browser: 4483
First, two, a picture and a character design, hardly change with the last "dragon ball GT." The scenery and the humorous view of the world of a country town will also be made and changed into a modern thing, and deployment which was slow tempo is also merely carried out early.
I want to say one.
It is necessary to dramatize old animation for modern style why.
Old my arare's image is broken down from one edge, so that there were also many not only the designs (hero suppaman etc.) that the talk from which time was deleted also had but character, and fellows changed into the unpleasant thing, in order to show a やたら and deployment early.
I think that I want Mr.
patapata for the direction which knows only the remake version to look at old my arare by its eye as 仰る...

2006/02/19 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by Patapata Provider: 3432 Host:3355 Browser: 5237
Although seen by nostalgia by the doctor slump having been remade ...
It is well that it was not a work good for a compliment.
Seeing only the 1st time, the rest did not carry out viewing and listening.
It is also けど to which severe criticism will not be carried out this much if there is even no previous work...
Since a previous work is not known, in people that he likes ordinarily, I think that a previous work surely has [ have / た / you / I ] a look.
Because the previous work was the work which was very excellent, if too inferior all fields, I will think that it is severe.
Although even something just had a thing with a sufficient grade ...
Don't I want my arare to perform individually at least in addition to Mr.
[ hill 茉美 ]?
(The same is said of minkiimomo)

2006/02/14 Comment(bad) [Original Japanese review]
by 634 Provider: 21108 Host:21018 Browser: 5234
the voice actor -- 達 -- I think that it is guiltless (The rakusu 教 side which is displeasure まる in "the cancer dam SEED", and was acted at any rate) Mr.
屋良有作 of the role of 1000 Hyoe was a good voice actor, and although he was inferior to Mr.
Kenji Utsumi, he did not think that an original character was bad.
however, the remake of skillful く活 or すこと was not completed -- surely -- taking out -- the voice actor of the -- 達 -- the thing which had not adopted the way of building which carries out skillful く融合 of the character, either and which it carried out and was not seen for efforts, either is clear It thinks that the first budget of "past as animation of a jump ate itself, and 本作 became the form ", and seems to have become next "kin meat man Nisei" and the starting point in the bad meaning of "聖闘士聖矢." It is not a remake, either, and is not the degradation version, either and it could be said that it was the result which may be called "literary exhibition of animation." It will begin to feel and may be that the branch-work in the bad meaning of the TOEI animation is [ whose suppaman of a Chinese snack has also finished vainly ] 本作.

2006/02/14 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Matsu Provider: 4245 Host:4401 Browser: 3846
It was looking to a young thing well.
I think that he fairly liked.
It is at "it is good" whether he can be enjoyed even if it sees now for the time being, although it does not understand.

Next / Post your review / Top page

Other media
Comics:Dr. Slump / Novel:Dr Slump

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.