Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews
Others
Site map

Search / Outside DB:

Anime ranking: Rank 2,584/in 2,707 titles (Total -20.02/Deviation 44.94) Rank 2,583 <= => Rank 2,585
Anime average points ranking: Rank 1,410/in 1,450 titles (Average -1.43(Bad)/Deviation 27.63) Rank 1,409 <= => Rank 1,411 (more than 10 evaluatoin)
Anime ranking of 2008: Rank 97/in 99 titles Rank 96 <= => Rank 98

Kanokon(Anime)


[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]


Other media
Comics:KANOKON
All
Reviews(Post)
ForumImagesGoods
(DVD)
Latest DVD: 2008/08/26 ():Kanokon 3 $99
DVD(2hit)
Sales/Latest
Toys(3hit)
Sales/Latest
Music(3hit)
Sales/Latest
Rank:20622
Kanon, Volume 1

Tag:$98
2008/01/01
()
Eval.:*****

1.A beautiful, lush animated drama series with characters that you actually care about.

Kanokon 3

Tag:$99
2008/08/26
()

Toy:Kanokon Bed Sheet Version B (Chizuru & Nozomu Hot Springs) 210cm X 140cm

Toy:Kanokon: Chizuru Minamoto Ani-Statue

Tag:$99
2008/12/03
()

Toy:To Aru Majutsu No Index: Mikoto Misaka Ani-Statue

Tag:$99
2008/12/03
()
Rank:796359
Audio CD:Kanokon

Tag:$97
2007/04/09
()

Audio CD:Game Ed Theme

Tag:$98
2008/09/24
()

Audio CD:Game Ed Theme

Tag:$98
2008/09/24
()
Information about this title

AT-X BANDAI CHANNEL CO., LTD. MEDIA FACTORY,INC.
Masashi Suzuki Takamiakio Toshihiko Nakajima
XEBEC.
Masami Okui Ui Miyazaki Yui Sakakibara
Mamiko Noto Ayako Kawasumi
Toshiyuki Toyonaga Chiwa Saito Kenji Nomura Takashi Kondou Yui Itsuki
Maii Kadowaki Tamaki Nakanishi Noriko Shitaya Takashi Matsuyama
Yuto Kazama Risa Hayamizu Naomi Shindo

Released:2008/04/05 in Japan End:2008/06/21 in Japan
Official sites
1. http://www.kanokon.com/index-n.html (Translation)
2. http://www.xebec-inc.co.jp/anime/kanokon/ (Translation)
Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)
 AverageAnimeRankDeviation(Total)Evaluation points(Total)Best of the Best
Inside JapanBad(-1.43)2,58444.94-20.02 

Statics of activity

Total ViewsCommentEvaluation
Inside Japan10,3831514
Outside Japan12100

How others evaluated in Japan

BestVery GoodGoodNormalBadVery BadWorst
People0004424
Percentage0.0%0.0%0.0%28.6%28.6%14.3%28.6%
Added percentage0%0%0%28.6%57.2%71.5%100%
Summary0%28.6%71.5%
                                                                                                  

Views for recent 8 days
Total6543213029
7
1
1
2
0
0
1
1
1

LanguageSorted by dateSorted by recommendation
EnglishGood
(Only Evaluation)
Normal
(Only Evaluation)
Bad
(Only Evaluation)
All
(Only Evaluation)
None
JapaneseGood
(Only Evaluation)
Normal
(Only Evaluation)
Bad
(Only Evaluation)
All
(Only Evaluation)
None
This reputation board


Post your review / Top page
Other media
Comics:KANOKON

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/09/30 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by OP屋さん Provider: 22700 Host:22657 Browser: 8901

[a good point]
-- character dithering -- kimo -- it is dear The member eroticism of a voice actor delightful to voice ota is made sale, and it is it well.
OP is good.

[Bad point]
Although the talk is too simple and is youth specification, only 寸止め is.

[Comprehensive evaluation]
It is if it sees by the new genre and the large eye.
Normal
2008/09/11 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by Sorujaa Provider: 17109 Host:17284 Browser: 6400
If this work was said at a word, it just called it fresh Eros.
By Mr.
Noto, since character is also negative, a hero's voice does not feel erotic [ to there ] as a thing with a soft pattern.
Moreover, the common sense of appeal of ちずる shifts too much and is also comical, and it is as a televiewer who understands becoming 寸止め, and semantic relief is carried out and it sees.
(The inside of the start got a splendid shock) Although it was right when saying that there was only an eroticism, it was the animation which a positive female character can fully enjoy as itself from the time of a shampoo.
[ favorite ]
2008/09/09 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by Naooki Provider: 25613 Host:25857 Browser: 8090
Although it thought that character dithering was very much dear, since how to write the line of karada was seldom liking, he was not able to be enjoyed.
the character of an after rori form -- the sex appeal laver to which nozomu is involved in me weak was disagreeable It was good that tayura and Asahina merely became good touch.
Although the character of there there came out and cooked among one more period of treatment, each episode with many characters which finish incompletely was sorry for it to be odd.
if it thinks that it is good to fasten by the sudden rainfall in the sunshine as for the after last -- the true last -- a lover -- と -- it was regrettable to finish it as that utterance (Bitter smile) He liked both of after theme songs.
kotatsu famous for a problem talked individually the back, and the cake of nine talks and the shining deployment to say thought yabai more.
(Sweat)
2008/07/12 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by Orutafuoosu Provider: 53824 Host:53807 Browser: 4925
ranobe which came out and which came out -- 問題作 of a core 1, and erotic erotic school love comedy - not coming -- !
now -- now -- as the body with which he bought the original book -- that "it having been well general and having passed" -- or [ that the erotic depiction ...
is how far reproducible ] -- from the bottom of its heart -- it was uneasy But very much [ it is as it is made sale, and ].
Or [ being more satisfactory than poor adult animation ].
Although ToLove る seemingly ate the rate by the cause well.
And being hidden into the clothes of the Eros was drawing well the shaking heart as a one girl "like to Kota of the heroine and ちずる." However, didn't that the badness [ a character ] of treatment is proportional to the thinness [ they ] of a debt become somehow or other?
It was especially embarrassed clearly in two teachers of Yatsuka and Sawara, the audiovisual room trio of 澪, Kiriyama, and Kumata, etc.
し [ parenthesis merit of 朔 was decreasing by 朔 ].
And the battle scene in an original is cut entirely and astonished in ten talks etc.
He still wants to support this animation.
Because entertainment releases brightness of 珠玉 just by being able to enjoy itself, without [ such ] thinking deeply, although it is not gara in a masterpiece etc.

2008/07/11 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by raruku Provider: 4685 Host:4630 Browser: 4983
Although enduringly seen and cooked to eight talks, it is a repetition of the same thing, and it is already a limit.
.
although the beauty girl animation and the repetition which will finish if love accomplishes with the そりゃ heroine are avoidable, not all other works have じゃ which devises and is わ(ing) in skillful い事 -- it is ..
not the reaction same as a hero therefore more each time but さぁ ..
Since it is animation only because of what 痴女 act is done to a character called main point bee づる of the work of ってまぁこ, it will be unavoidable.
.
However, since real value is demonstrated just by calling it ..
which becomes gero or an eroticism's being shy, if an eroticism is also consumed too much, a forefinger does not seethe with not much positive daughters.
.
けど which would still be seen at least when gag was interesting to a slight degree in addition to the eroticism or conversation tempo was good.
Regrettable, although illustrating is good with much trouble.
It is "very bad." I think it great to merely have made and shown such things which super-specialized erotically.

2008/06/29 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by mittili Provider: 53955 Host:54069 Browser: 5292

[Good point]
- theme song is good.
A girl is also dear.
They are Mr.
Asahina and my frog especially.

[Bad point]
If it was - Eros Daio, I wanted you to express that more.
Since there is that [ no ], it pats, and it is ?.
It could have like this, could have and did not understand whether it was さん.
- A hero is hopeless.
It does not receive.

[comprehensive evaluation]
- remake by 18 禁 for the time being It is broadcast sunna as general animation.
Since there is such の, animation is useless.
It is bought and divided.
- 唯, Mr.
Asahina and なゆ et al.
だったけな ?
A good couple.
These two persons cared to the last.
Confessing kana.
It was the only oasis of this animation.
- Carry out for the time being and it is よ.
Is it the dog which the peak attached by って and maji?
(Oh, a supernatural creature けな ?
which was a fox) doing one's best -- evaluation comment writing -- better -- た ....
is also already a limit Please pardon....
It is ...
well in worst x5.

2008/06/28 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by Matsu Provider: 28614 Host:28486 Browser: 7875
Even if seen to the last, the impression that it was only the talk which does not have an erotic scene and contents each time did not change.
The character of help is dear.

2008/06/25 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by Fuai Provider: 1725 Host:1606 Browser: 7590
I will accept the thing with erotic sale ...
It is made to spread and is !.
If it considers as だ, that it is a degree sun stop the whole degree will get angry the whole hakkiri 言って.
逝って which it carries out till the last moment even if I will become metaphor 18 禁, and is not ...
it wanted The way of " ruruushu R2" is well very much, and how to show a じゃ [ this ] eroticism, although this work is more excessive is 。.
That じゃ喜ぶ is at least a junior high school student.
I thought that what is necessary was to make it adult specification obediently and just to sell to the line.

2008/06/23 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Yakkuru Provider: 17471 Host:17537 Browser: 4661
An interesting point will not be found if it says clearly.
taking that by calling it sex appeal about 90% or more, since an eroticism is a subject -- completely -- と -- though such an interesting point that you may say is regrettable, there is nothing Of which age is the televiewer layer targeted first?
Also about the evaluation except the important eroticism, gag is boring.
There is also no moving scene.
There is no climax also in a battle.
Attractive "arms" drawn a viewing-and-listening person is not found at all in the work itself.
or -- eroticisms are already arms -- しか -- the contents which cannot be said Since only the opinion negative to remainder is expressed, even if it is going to look for a good point, it does not happen not to think.
It is not answered that it is erotic too ...
It is not attached as comprehensive evaluation except the mist beam worst.

2008/06/22 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Gyangyangyan Provider: 30090 Host:29930 Browser: 2458

[Good point]
望 is only dear.

[Bad point]
They are all mostly.

[Comprehensive evaluation]
Scenario composition is amusing first.
Although it is not ん from the villain's fellow, is finally it?
With no hint maji meaning.
It tears too much time on a petty erotic scene, and passes this editing gdgd on it.
Although it is a た Mr.
man like this, feebly, it is unpleasant and there is also no voice of Noto.
It is seeing and there is no displeasure pole ball.
The worst animation infallible this term!

2008/06/05 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by OD Provider: 38670 Host:38708 Browser: 4926

[a good point]
- especially nothing
[Bad point]
A story is tedious each time [ - ].
- The sound effect in a work is cheap.
- It is cold.
Are they the contents which say in
[comprehensive evaluation]
or surely are likely to carry out a small junior high school student receptacle?
Although a picture is modern, is it the style which makes somewhere Showa consider?
Although I was looking only to six talks since I was appreciating by distribution, I was able to have only the comment of "kudoi" in the turning point.
Although it does not know since original ranobe and comics have not read, and it is [ this being a work and ] dear whether it is completely made the erotic animation of a beast, breaking, and an abnormal system, a mosaic is also hung, and it should have sold as for w picture, since it is halfway in all, I will estimate that it is bad.

2008/05/25 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by 青い羊 Provider: 9702 Host:9807 Browser: 8090
it must be "寸止め" -- 苦笑作 which had become "full contact" when が気 stuck Since it was after the 7th talk a thing with a free distribution complete stop, although an evaluation comment is carried out, it is natural well.
Also in the 6th talk, the leg usage in the inside of kotatsu is not whom [ any ] other than a "play" any longer, either, and if straight so far, foolish runs through him and has only laughed at the degree.
Although a supernatural creature is beta too much in the heroine, before a supernatural creature, I hear that it is "恥女" and it can be said that there is only originality very.
し [ much production which suspects the senses of a producer side will serve as a tradition the future ].
It is certain that it is the animation which is not good, either, and it is mazui morally, if [ evaluation ] "bad." However, I had a fact of acquisition, and this the disturbance of a series of provoke laughter the first place of a small junior high school student's (boy) network animation audience rating.
Thank you very much [ time / pleasant ].
(Although it is just as a producer side expects when DVD sells explosively now, it is the premonition which is likely to become so somehow.) Although it is probably aiming supposing it is aiming or, is their "business ability" admired?

2008/05/10 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by 古典主義 Provider: 2561 Host:2479 Browser: 5234

[Good point]
There is nothing in itself.

[bad point]
the contents and the other amusement element of a erogee imitation are poor -- very .
A haワワ system shota hero will be approached by the 妖狐 heroine of sexual excitement, and tsurupeta 狼娘 for 10,000 years, and it is every day of a 寸止め abnormal play.
Even giddiness is memorized by contents like junior high school student wota illusion.
I think whether to be the contents which should be broadcast on television.

[Comprehensive evaluation]
"Worst." 。 which should make erotic animation clearly and should be sold as 18 禁 if it is such contents It is hard to allow the commercialism by the side of manufacture and the ethical lack which broadcast the work which is in a "borderline" as kore.
Mr.
"who recommended me this" -- good -- don't carry out courage from [ beforehand ] -- how -- と -- although considered, your recommendation is not trusted in the 金輪 case Although a manufacture side is Uberzeugungserbrechen from the first and "school deizu" also estimates deployment like harassment as an ant, a thing like such a policy does not have it in this work.
It has a pain in the head that are the lump of the perverted commercialism of rose 撒けば売れる, and the contents of a work carry out 似非 erotic depiction of an animation character only to abnormal 染みた erotic play depiction from beginning to end.

2008/04/21 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by あり団子 Provider: 11215 Host:11224 Browser: 6395
up to three talks -- viewing and listening -- erotic as usual each time -- it is -- it is .
old neta 使 and old time when three talks are great, a vulgar place, and the heroine -- 獣って -- including -- just for a moment -- "-- absent -- it bit and " was suggested "-- absent -- biting -- " -- on the way -- he is transformed, and although cooked, this work is one-track and I feel that it is also likely to progress from now on for it individually, increasingly erotic at eye three talks -- く -- it was judged from depiction that viewing and listening was stopped Evaluation is stopped but the place which you may comment "Is very bad" for "it to be bad."
2008/04/13 Comment(bad) [Original Japanese review]
by 英哉 Provider: 52329 Host:52359 Browser: 6232
As the frank thought which carried out the 1st talk viewing and listening ...
The contents are turned down to some extent for < netabare consideration.
& gt; In a synthetic viewpoint, something happens from deployment of the second half in the "next talk.
Although it seems that that it was able to read with " carried out happy, the large evaluation compensation by the age limit is unlikely to be avoided just for a moment.
The direction of viewing and listening wants to still give evaluation anew in the place continued to a slight degree.
(It is ...
whether when there was no clear hint, it had become the worst and a viewing-and-listening stop) Can it be called "love comedy & action too self-conscious about visiting slightly"?
Is a visual side slightly random at the display of a crowd?
If the small problem with the production of touch of the focus being contained a little on the whole, and being hard to see some is considered except for excessive [ of the production of a certain thing ], to the worst, it crawls, and it will suit and it will consider.
It may be safer to avoid viewing and listening with the household in which a child is merely since reality and production are slightly excessive, though that is right.
As my evaluation in this time, it is changing by C (bad) as a work simple substance.
(equivalent to A, if there is no compensation) Although it may be dependent on next deployment and may change very well
Post your review / Top page
Other media
Comics:KANOKON

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.
Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.



Please give your evaluation or comment.

You need two other people's comment to post your comment again after you post your evaluation or comment.
Other media
Comics:KANOKON

Your Name(Required)
Password (Required. more than 4 characters)
Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.
Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.


Top page of DB | Site map | Copyright(c) 1999- 1st Class All rights reserved