Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Novel ranking: Rank 465/in 2,366 titles (Total 5.00/Deviation 50.16) Rank 464 <= => Rank 466

2001 A SPACE ODYSSEY(Novel)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

Other media
Movie:2001:A Space Odyssey

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Goods
(Books)

Latest Books: 2008/08/31 ():

Chariots for Apollo $99

Books(157hit) Sales/Latest						DVD(26hit) Sales/Latest	VHS(19hit) Sales/Latest	Music(49hit) Sales/Latest	Toys(1hit) Sales/Latest
Rank:46521 Paperback:2001: A Space Odyssey Tag:$99 2000/09/12 () Eval.:***** 1.The book that started it all	Rank:47261 Kindle Edition:Chariots for Apollo Tag:$99 2008/08/31 ()	Rank:51821 Kindle Edition:The Space Shuttle Decision Tag:$99 2008/08/31 ()	Rank:54234 Kindle Edition:Living and Working in Space - A History of Skylab Tag:$99 2008/04/14 () Eval.:***** 1.The Official NASA History of the Skylab Program	Rank:154898 Hardcover:The Art of Robert McCall: A Celebration of Our Future in Space Tag:$00 1992/09/01 () Eval.:***** 1.Space artist	Rank:297307 Mass Market Paperback:2061: Odyssey Three Tag:$99 1989/04/13 () Eval.:***** 1. A weak link	Rank:249 Blu-ray:2001 - A Space Odyssey [Blu-ray] Tag:$99 2007/10/23 () Eval.:***** 1.The best copy of 2001 Space Odyssey in Blu-ray....	Rank:8804 VHS Tape:2001: A Space Odyssey Tag:$98 1993/06/30 () Eval.:***** 1.The best copy of 2001 Space Odyssey in Blu-ray....	Rank:9914 Audio CD:2001: A Space Odyssey - Original Motion Picture Soundtrack (1996 Reissue) Tag:$98 1996/10/29 () Eval.:***** 1.Brings Back the Movie	Rank:83772 Toy:Hal 2001 Space Odyssey dancing robot hamster Eval.:***** 1.product malfunctions

Information about this title

Sir Arthur Charles Clarke
Hayakawa Publishing Corporation

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	NovelRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Best(2.50)	465	50.16	5.00

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	452	2	2
Outside Japan	31	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

50.0%

0.0%

Added percentage

50%

100%

Summary

100%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 6 5 4 3 2 1 30 29
6 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

Other media
Movie:2001:A Space Odyssey

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/10/04 Best! [Original Japanese review]
by moon-moon Provider: 10640 Host:10578 Browser: 6313
Are somewhere made indifferent like the movie?
Although he read the movie after saw, I thought that it was a very wonderful work.
First, consideration and depiction of technology are sugoi.
If war etc.
has not occurred after that time to which this novel was written, it is like [ which can be regarded as probably it having probably been such 2001 ].
And with this novel version, it is written in detail in the movie that it was incomprehensible.
"A rebellion of a computer" and "evolution of human beings" are drawn as a theme, and a thing like "first contact" is also drawn the back.
that is, "first contact" -- being related -- human beings -- actual -- the life object outside the earth -- direct -- not encountering -- the trace (?) of the life object outside the earth It encounters indirectly through a thing [ like ].
It is it (just because it is it).
It is sugoi for it to be joined to a stage called the universe, and to have become a more big-scale talk.
The "star chairudo" of the last direction is [ which you may have ] especially more wonderful.
Deployment which it cannot finish expressing with this image.
It does not stop truly.
It will read at a stretch.
and it will be what -- this feeling after finishing reading -- mystical Impression.
It is since it is made this evaluation by saying.
About this work, I thought it fairly important to touch both.
Those who have seen the movie are right or wrong.

2007/07/27 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by スペ9 Provider: 19044 Host:18833 Browser: 5623
The "bad" impression of a movie = probably, this the "novel version" is fit for a guide to hard SF, since it is intelligible, although it may be avoided crabbedly.
"2001: A Space Odyssey" of Arthur, C, and the Clark interpretation which is not an original or noberaizu in fact, either.
(Incidentally draft proposal "an advance post" non-読 an acquaintance under arrangements.) The difficulty of a movie "2001: A Space Odyssey" is because "the flood of a computer" and the "step of evolution of human beings" were made to completely be seen without explanation and narration, and since it is well-known to this interpretation by the end of today, it is not difficult at all.
It has as a text of this "interpretation", and it can be said that an oar was pulled.
That is, tokoro to tell as "SF" is the thing with same movie version and this novel version.
toko "whose last destination of "it is not noberaizu" is Saturn" externally first at a thing The destination of the Discovery number in the novel version "a trip of the 2010 universe" is Jupiter, and other day teiiru are also based on the thing puzzling incidentally at the movie version.
- to which the difference which is not external is made as for the movie version with the special-effects technology at the time of [ "how to tell information chosen as image work" ] -- it is day teiiru" chosen without being able to do It is interesting here.
First, although Mr.
Clark has declared the difference in the last destination, it is changed by Mr.
Kubrick for intelligibility serious consideration.
Moreover, probably, drawing attractively the swingby according to Jupiter also as special-effects technology has that it was also difficult (although said by way of precaution, the special-effects technology in the movie version is top class and gorgeousness impossible today absolutely of those days).
Moreover, although there is a scene the rebellion of Hull also "excludes" the bow man who rode on space poddo with the movie version, with the novel version, the scene does not exist and has the scene which opens the door of poddo wide as a scene to replace, and emits air.
If it was these days of CG height of prosperity, although it became, and it was pleased with the highlight and koko etc.
was probably adopted as it, in that time, it will be difficult.
With the novel version, to having killed the crew under hibernation now, the scene by which there is also just no "sound and" life support system is turned off is adopted, and the "fearfulness" as visual is demonstrated with the movie version.
Moreover, with the movie version, it is shown on this and a shocking visual scene with slit scan to the world which is beyond in imagination of the unexplored universe also in the scene of the most interesting part "Stargate" of a tale with the novel version being described.
In short, the movie version not only escapes from the ability of "technical target not to do, but is creating visual" to which even excellence carries out it to this novel version being made from grammar very orthodox as a hard SF novel.
The movie version is somehow adjusted to the text "to raise" by なっちゃってる's.
Mr.
Junji Kon Clark's work is read and carried forward (it will read again a work and "2010").
Although "isolation with a theme to write with the work originally and the scene which results in it" is worrisome as a teacher's subtracting point (it is ridiculous), these "2001" has a good thing with little it.
Good one of translation is also happier than "2061." However, the "highest !
Since the basis of the work "2001" has no Mr.
Kubrick's existence too and it does not obtain, even if there is not making it " the movie version and variously [ novel version ].
there -- with [ in coexistence with notability ] no complaint as a primer (to the last -- hard SF) of hard SF even if it carries out a difference and pulls

Post your review / Top page

Other media
Movie:2001:A Space Odyssey

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.