Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Novel ranking: Rank 1,799/in 2,368 titles (Total 1.00/Deviation 47.94) Rank 1,798 <= => Rank 1,800
Novel ranking of 1987: Rank 10/in 16 titles Rank 9 <= => Rank 11

House in the bottom of a lake(Novel)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Author:[Stuart Woods}
Translator:Kouzaburou Yano
Publisher:Bungeishunjuu

Released:1987/12 in Japan

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	NovelRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Good(1.00)	1,799	47.94	1.00

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	187	1	1
Outside Japan	20	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

0.0%

100.0%

0.0%

Added percentage

100%

100%

Summary

100%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2007/06/19 Good [Original Japanese review]
by 夙夜健 Provider: 18384 Host:18446 Browser: 6287
Masterpiece in a masterpiece "Chief of police Newspaper reporter John who contributed to murder case solution - haueru is the tale of the incident which encountered with the background visited in order to write a certain man's autobiography, after resigning from a newspaper publishing company." [Good point] It is the place where atmosphere is heavy comparatively readable.
Ghost ?
What was in が出てきて and the past.
?
Interest was able to be poured out.
[imaichi point] It is since it is not a pure mystery.
It is ant " anything.
The portion was slightly regrettable.
The last action, the occurrence of back 出し, etc.
have been felt forcibly somehow.
[Comprehensive evaluation] Although there was an impression of having been more interesting when it read before, although it was pleasantly, since it considers also to eye 興醒, by this rereading, the place felt abruptly gives a discount.
It is usually ".
It is near.
"It is good.
" It carries out.

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.