Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Novel ranking: Rank 160/in 2,373 titles (Total 15.00/Deviation 56.13) Rank 159 <= => Rank 161
Novel ranking of 2004: Rank 10/in 99 titles Rank 9 <= => Rank 11

Kamen Raider Faiz seiden: igyou no hanabana(Novel)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Information about this title

Shoutarou Ishinomori
Inoue Toshiki
Koudansha

Released:2004/8/18 in Japan

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	NovelRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Very good(2.00)	160	56.13	15.00	1

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	2,336	2	2
Outside Japan	175	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

50.0%

0.0%

50.0%

0.0%

Added percentage

50%

100%

Summary

100%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13
1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation New!
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation New!
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2005/08/19 Good [Original Japanese review]
by 下田の里 Provider: 17884 Host:17669 Browser: 4184
Although the TV version is a setup and story which are different completely, I think that the theme of this editing had come out often, bad, and direct.
Although evaluation severe as a novel must be carried out, I think whether since the inside of each character is oozing, he can be enjoyed if the TV version is the direction which he likes and has erotic and grotesque tolerance (a battle scene [ Sentence a chapter frankly ] tsuma of sliced raw fish etc.).
-- If divided into a vertical volume, depth comes out to the work world and the point is merely regrettable to wax.
It is that the Kimura 沙耶嬢 which was a role of choi in this editing was bearing the core of a story by no means.
-- It is "good" only at it.

2005/07/07 Best! [Original Japanese review]
by 栗無損 Provider: 11779 Host:11572 Browser: 3875
It writes also with an author's text power (し [ it is a dramatist ]).
But since the contents heard that Mr.
Toshiki Inoue took per fine work in the sentence of some of applications of ancient times something were too shocking, evaluation is to the "highest." It was a shock first [ in 2004 ] in summer.
A text is め quite frankly.
Since it wrote in more and る was thought, was it disappointment just for a moment?
Since it was readable in やたら well, it is good kana.
A delta does not appear.
Mihara is not, either.
There is no smart brain trust.
Neither a smart lady nor President Murakami also comes out.
A lucky clover is not.
But dragon orufuenoku comes out.
There are fuaizu and no exclusive motorbike (auto bajin and side basshaa) of Kaiser.
Accelerator form and bra star form are also a pear.
Most battle scenes are addition levels the back.
It is because the way which is not expected is the body.
A hero is truth.
Although each one besides 巧や Koba also comes out, of course ....
It shocking-passes over important contents and they cannot be said.
He is writing detailed one in the column of special effects "the mask rider 555." the back is likely to come -- as for what, the text of Mr.
role Kohei Murakami of Masato Kusaka, Shinichiro Shirakura P, and Mr.
Toshiki Inoue is written The contents were surprised and Mr.
Inoue was surprised at only two weeks also having written kore.

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.