Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Novel ranking: Rank 2,041/in 2,368 titles (Total 0.00/Deviation 47.37) Rank 2,040 <= => Rank 2,042
Novel ranking of 2001: Rank 42/in 60 titles Rank 41 <= => Rank 43

Detamaka(Novel)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Information about this title

Kadokawa Shoten Publishing Co.,Ltd.
Kadokawa sunika bunko

Released:2001/03 in Japan End:2006/05 in Japan

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	NovelRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Good(0.00)	2,041	47.37	0.00

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	597	1	1
Outside Japan	60	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

0.0%

100.0%

0.0%

Added percentage

100%

100%

Summary

100.0%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4
3 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2007/06/19 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by 月夜の兎 Provider: 51494 Host:51660 Browser: 6287
ひっくり返す's is the series of a highlight about the situation that a hero is in a predicament, in 奇策 of "whether to be ま which came out" as = [ which "is ま which came out" ] "having come out is dependence on こ" series title tells Series is 3 part composition.
By the "account of autonia kingdom hard fighting" empire where a hero commands a poor fleet and fights with the enemy country "autonia kingdom 再興録" which fights to make ruined autonia revive -- and Although it is the "autonia kingdom human-beings record of war" which fights with different-species life object " zanakkusu ", risking human beings' fate -- If it says about part III, there is already no meaning using the name of "autonia." since it is the talk of fighting with an enemy common to human beings -- "a country" -- how -- like this -- と -- is the title to say not suitable?
Part I progressed with sufficient tempo with a hero's maido viewpoint, is the person image in which a hero and the heroine are likable, and was able to be enjoyed.
It was surprised by the ending which the tragedy greatest to the timing made to regard it as the denouement now visits.
In part II, although there was the feeling [ war situation ] of a frame frame ひっ repetition てくれる or ?, how for few goods and few talented people, since deployment is the same as 毎巻割, weariness has come gradually.
The good feel had become the person who is likely to show humane growth taking advantage of kyara which is equivalent to a hero's rival having been defeated by the hero, and calls it a worthy rival.
I thought that the trial "he wanted to write not a person but the world" had also improved well.
[ of the author ] Although part III was the tale (I wanted to write) which the author originally considered, the series till then which has developed in the keyword the country "autonia" is already a different thing.
Since the point was worrisome, although the last read, the deployment which pokes by surprise [ till then / like ] was thought how it is that it is one now (し [ partners are not human beings ]) and to have said that it withered [ the language of characters or action / by kachiri ] in a justice and villain side and is only the same.
Furthermore, if it says, an author's another series "crossing load of space-time" series and the speech and conduct of a character which were developed in the electric shock library are the same.
& quot; crossing load " -- although the world of the future is [ of the world ] a stage all the time -- a view and an action base -- all -- the same って -- how -- と -- it is alike involuntarily and is not needed Although a lot of characters are needed, final "fortunate form" will think that only the end "it gets married and a child can do" is different in what.
Might not each man's peace and happiness be shown more?
It was substantial and there were a place surprised and a place which carries out a じん rate.
But it is the work which remains in "the grade whether a favorite person likes it" if then called recommendation or ?.
Or [ that the extra collection of short stories of "10 遺録" title was more interesting rather ].
Although this author's work has been altogether read to the conclusion of this work since a crossing load, the impression "each is the same" as it reads will be held.

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.