Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Novel ranking: Rank 2,361/in 2,388 titles (Total -4.00/Deviation 45.00) Rank 2,360 <= => Rank 2,362
Novel ranking of 2003: Rank 67/in 69 titles Rank 66 <= => Rank 68

Grotesque(Novel)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Goods
(Books)

Latest Books: 2008/02/12 ():

Grotesque (Vintage International) $00

Books(650hit) Sales/Latest						DVD(2hit) Sales/Latest	VHS(2hit) Sales/Latest	Music(73hit) Sales/Latest	Toys(1hit) Sales/Latest
Rank:28972 Hardcover:If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans Tag:$95 2007/10/02 () Eval.:***** 1.Lonely stick-woman calls people names, writes another book	Rank:37721 Paperback:Auschwitz: True Tales From a Grotesque Land Tag:$95 1986/08/30 () Eval.:***** 1.Fascinating	Rank:39263 Paperback:Grotesque (Vintage International) Tag:$00 2008/02/12 () Eval.:***** 1.Worth A Look	Rank:70767 Mass Market Paperback:Depraved: The Definitive True Story of H.H. Holmes, Whose Grotesque Crimes Shattered Turn-... Tag:$99 2004/01/27 () Eval.:***** 1.superb	Rank:112076 Paperback:Hell Beasts: How to Draw Grotesque Fantasy Creatures Tag:$99 2007/07/06 () Eval.:***** 1.Original ideas and illustration	Rank:132633 Paperback:The Gargoyle Book: 572 Examples from Gothic Architecture Tag:$95 2006/08/04 () Eval.:***** 1.Misleading new title for the reprint of a very old book.	Rank:30022 Mr. Skeffington Tag:$98 2005/06/14 () Eval.:***** 1.What an interesting movie!	Rank:12042 VHS Tape:Grave Indiscretion - (aka "The Grotesque") Tag:$98 1999/01/12 () Eval.:***** 1.Blaaah!	Rank:15163 Audio CD:Gardens of Grief/In the Embrace of Evil Tag:$99 2001/06/26 () Eval.:***** 1.Heavy and raw	Toy:Games Workshop Dark Eldar Grotesques Blister

Information about this title

NATSUO KIRINO
Bunnsyunn bunko

Released:2003/06 in Japan

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	NovelRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Very bad(-2.00)	2,361	45.00	-4.00

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	857	2	2
Outside Japan	71	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

0.0%

100.0%

0.0%

Added percentage

100%

100%

Summary

100%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 4 3 2 1 31 30 29 28
5 1 1 2 0 0 0 1 0

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/04/02 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by 夙夜健 Provider: 18384 Host:18446 Browser: 6287
Although the library was read, it was what 々 and I do not understand for description well.
Since there are two victims once [ It is someone & to have killed them.; Although he wanted to know the motive ] ....
A tale is told with various viewpoints and 殺害犯 says that a woman called Kazue has not killed.
Although interest was considerably memorized into this portion, after all, there was nothing, and especially the meaning was sorry.
Those who are likable in main characters do not break, either, but there is no invigoration as entame.
He has not understood the thing which the author wanted to sue for this work.
Although there was an incident of the same kind which occurred actually, for the reason, the portion of an interest basis is felt some, and it does not give a good impression.
However, the text itself is since it was readable.
"It is very bad.
" It is made どまり.

2007/11/26 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by HUNGRY SPIDER Review history[Good:2(40%) Normal:1(20%) Bad:2(40%)] / Provider: 3586 Host:3656 Browser: 7395
"Strange" and strange [ "strange" ] Although it is the work with the meaning become of the title of "being grotesque", if it 通読, it will just be deeply impressed with names and natures do often agree.
Narration by - ます tone is adopted as a sentence of the ground.
the hero "me" by whom even a name is not given -- The account of a hand of "yuriko" which has monster-good looks by a hero's younger sister, an awkward hard worker's "Kazue"'s diary, It is the large frame of 本作 that flow from confession of a shrewd honor student "mitsuru" and China, and mix the many-sided viewpoint of the written statement of the murderous fiend "Chillan" who reached, and yuriko and Kazue approach the incident in which it was killed successively.
Honestly being made to read in this style gets very tired.
Four persons (since mitsuru was confessed in conversation with a hero, it is excepted from a storyteller) who become a storyteller by 本作 are because it adheres to itself in the bad meaning so that all the members are morbid.
I want "therefore it is what ?" and to be self-asserted repeatedly, to ask, "is it different?", or to unzari one way or other, saying "when I am Q college graduate and it was proud of night by G construction service, saying popular person", " was also obtained and your opinion was understood --", and to come to counter However, by 本作, since it is the ", no portion following " is shown.
For a long time, the subjectivity of the person who becomes a storyteller is only repeated.
and saying [ the contents of the subjectivity ] -- each -- a woman -- a sex -- the thing is expressed with the form of "a bias", "jealousy", ""distortion which envies and consists of "", and "degeneration" Are they five kinds of degeneration theories and overstatements?
This is just the basic structure of 本作 and it is also the "trap" devised to the reader.
If it separates from a work just for a moment, although it will not say that a storyteller's opinion is wrong and it turns out severely that it inclines fairly, 本作 has persisted in the deviation.
therefore, "objectivity" and the element which can change -- thorough -- 削ぎ dropping ている -- a point with important things Though hazy, since the real image of an incident is made to emerge by four storytellers, aim does not attach to a reader what what is an imitation in truth.
Since there is no objectivity, the right course of a tale cannot be approached.
When it becomes, receiving an indifferent opinion horrifying and yet merely must be continued.
The challenge filled with moreover to the suspicion over society or gender (this one thinks that it is suitable rather than a sex) is struck to a reader.
Probably, the impact (trap) of 本作 as if the evil spirit was fascinated completely is coming from operation of "storyteller's subjectivity -> reader's subject." Since it is such a work, I think that opinions will differ greatly by the male and the woman.
He reads and, probably て疲れる理由 is also it.
I want to have got tired why or to describe only a few hereafter.
Considering oneself, "a woman's castle" is a strange domain and the hierarchy peculiar to a woman different from society again etc.
does not have the means to know, either.
[ male slack ] That is, 本作 has too few portions which synchronize with themselves.
Therefore, an active posture [ say / "sympathy" and "rebounding" ] could not be taken, but their whole circumstances merely had to be watched from outside.
Since it is an outsider, the feeling of 苛々 for which the inner element of 本作 honestly cannot be pressed collects.
Since it does not resonate with itself, what the problem which should boil and should go up from "a storyteller's subjectivity" was also pressed for truly is not felt.
Using imaginative power in the subjective world where it inclined extremely, for assimilation, even though it plots an idea forcibly personally required whether physical strength and emotional strength are required very much.
やらなきゃ何 is not obtained, either -- since it does but -- hell -- penance or this [!?
] -- 本作 is a work very "difficult" and had unpleasant tiredness held by after reading for oneself in this way A person's depiction was wonderful and it is clear that there was also a place which seems to begin to scoop out the shade of the human being beyond sex difference in the contents plentifully to the extent that it seems to feel the comfortable cold, as if it saw also by good horror with storytellers in the work, if it was the direction with which soul can be made to sympathize.
The depiction which put into practice and hid "陽" and pierced through "shade" stubbornly is sublime to be sure and ghastly.
Even so, balance is too bad although it is what was meant.
A reader is chosen in any way and it is る感じ.
Although 本作 can also consider まぁ and this also in a work slack proof suitable for expressing figuratively as a "variant" -- Seemingly, he did not suit 本作 somehow.
Although it can regard also as rather violent opting for evaluation for reasons of what [ まぁ / "it does not suit" / a thing ], it is the meaning which shows that there is also human being with such an impression, and the evaluation to its 本作 presupposes / be / allowed to た / I ] "It is very bad."

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.