Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Novel ranking: Rank 210/in 2,368 titles (Total 12.00/Deviation 54.06) Rank 209 <= => Rank 211

KotounoOni(Novel)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Information about this title

Ranpo Edogawa

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	NovelRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Very good(2.40)	210	54.06	12.00

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	1,158	5	5
Outside Japan	150	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

40.0%

60.0%

0.0%

Added percentage

40%

100%

100%

Summary

100%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4
1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/09/10 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by Zabii Provider: 26198 Host:26193 Browser: 3646

[Good point]
Goose bumps stood by the unexpected deployment and the unexpected surprise out of the 人外境 letter in the middle of -.
- a そまざまな element -- introduction ており inference, treasure-hunting, and adventure - it is reading that it is mysterious and don't 飽き bored However, there is no settlement in talking a little [ opposite side ].

[Bad point]
Although - panorama island strange story was also so, he has not understood a metaphor or explanation of a thing.

[Comprehensive evaluation]
Work called highest masterpiece of the long piece of an Edogawa random step.
Random step complete works were seen at a library, it thought until now that it would read to a trial although the work of a random step was not read and at least the name was known, and the demon of a solitary island had appeared in the beginning of the book.
It was interesting, although the continuation was worrisome and read from the title and beginning.
Since the random step had the image of Akechi smallness Goro or a boy detective team, it was surprised that such a work was also written.
When it was said [ which ] whether it was, he had a feeling called a mysterious novel rather than the detective story.

2008/08/08 Best! [Original Japanese review]
by Joona Provider: 6656 Host:6547 Browser: 7395
I think that the image to a random step teacher changed very much with this work.
It is abnormal-like, and although it is an unpleasant view of the world in cutaneous sensation, the thing like the true love which it is in Moroto's Minoura for which a glimpse of a pure thing is caught so that it may shine can be performed into it.
Although there are some persons who are writing previously, twins' letter is a goose-bumps thing.
Since he wanted to experience such feelings too, I thought that a book was read.

2008/01/08 Best! [Original Japanese review]
by 福田浩司総理大臣 Provider: 7304 Host:7321 Browser: 4184
[A good point] Twins' letter [a bad point] It is [comprehensive evaluation] which is not without an unnatural place, either.
It is the highest masterpiece of a random step.
It is impossible and teleplay-ization is しょ.
Since an original divides strangely [ image ].
It can be somehow said as a certain field SF novel.

2006/02/16 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by 夙夜健 Provider: 18384 Host:18446 Browser: 6287
A way of speaking called a happy end is uniquely for a random step work, although it may not be appropriate.
?
May I call it the way which finishes being bright?
it is realistic and more nearly such than the work of eye dark -- somewhat visionary ?
Originally the way of the talk is liking.
There is a peculiar atmosphere and there is an impression of having been interesting.

2005/05/27 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by Guruguruneko Provider: 27495 Host:27195 Browser: 3875
A long mystery [ especially masterpiece / in a random step ].
I think that hearing such evaluation たり is also just like that also as itself.
But the work of a random step is not read to there.
Some were only read for the famous short story.
However, but [ so ], not to mention it took to it and the contents do not feel oldness (a style is old), even if it sees now the style which scooped out the atmosphere of a random step, and man's inside deeply, for oneself, it receives very fresh and it is.
He also likes this work very much as one of such the works.
As contents, though it is a mystery, a hero is not a detective.
It is not the thing of the kind referred to as that a detective, not to mention it, is solved manfully, either.
A hero exists as a role told to a reader by making into a story of personal experiences the incident which arose in its own body, and appears.
Since the contents of the talk do not remember vaguely, although the fine talk is avoided, especially the deployment in a part is interesting in the second half.
It can read without remaining very smoothly from deployment that the detective which appears at the beginning will be killed to process in which the hero witnesses the unusual state toward the island.
The mystery was worried with what deployment is shown for what meaning it has after this, and it did not 飽き bored.
Man's depiction of the fun as a mystery is also precise with last thing, and its substantial reading something is also enough.
Evaluation "is very good." One work for which it waited at the random step.

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.