Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Drama ranking: Rank 330/in 962 titles (Total 3.04/Deviation 49.29) Rank 329 <= => Rank 331
Drama ranking of 2006: Rank 25/in 76 titles Rank 24 <= => Rank 26

FUGOH KEIJI DELUXE(Drama)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Information about this title

TV Asahi
Yasutaka Tsutsui Sincyou bunko Takuro Fukuda Yo Tsuji Asahi Broadcasting Corporation(ABC-TV) Toho
Kyoko Fukada Tokuma Nishioka Shinji Yamashita Susumu Terajima
Kazuyuki Aizima Kazuma Suzuki Ryuji Sainei Maho Nonami
Megumi Nakayama Yoshie Ichige Mitsuki Koga Isao Natsuyagi
Tohru Emori Koji Shimizu Akiko Hinagata
Kami Hiraiwa Kyoko Matsunaga Masatou Ibu Takatoshi Kaneko Hidekazu Nagai Masakatsu Funaki
Ijirii okada

Released:2006/04/21 in Japan End:2006/06/23 in Japan

Official sites
1. http://www.tv-asahi.co.jp/fugoh/ (Translation)

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	DramaRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Good(0.38)	330	49.29	3.04

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	2,693	9	8
Outside Japan	154	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

0.0%

12.5%

50.0%

12.5%

0.0%

Added percentage

12.5%

62.5%

75%

87.5%

100%

Summary

62.5%

12.5%

25%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13
1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation New!
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation New!
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2007/05/08 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by Suワroo Provider: 18003 Host:17951 Browser: 4724
Although its original is non-読, this drama is just SF.
if compared and said, cartoonist Fujiko, F, and un-2 males had advocated -- SF (somewhat wonderful) -- it is a view of the world, and non-日常 which lurks daily is drawn by setup (a lot of money is used and it is solution etc.
about an incident) which is not possible, and the colorful supporting player is brewing the strange reality This regards the world drawn in "Doraemon" and Ms.
Fujiko's F SF short story as it being the experimental work what to become body present する actually.
I think that especially the story of the fortune-teller and princess beauty Kazuko of the 4th talk is the performance which loses and is not inferior to SF short story of Fujiko, F, and un-2 males in an uncanny fear view with actual 諷刺 and a reality wonderfully.
Although there are probably the pros and cons in Kyouko Fukada's performance, in order to perform such strange characters, she who has seemingly changed also actually just for a moment may be the most proper.

2007/04/30 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Kaname Provider: 16388 Host:16273 Browser: 4184
The impression of having fallen from the previous work was not without having.
Although a scale is more than a previous work, is it mannerism if this is done repeatedly truly?
It was regrettable that especially the last round usually passed.
It is that a few also changed the impression when taking out the gorgeous guest to previous work みたい again.
-- It was glad that a regular hardly changed.
Although it was regrettable that Police Inspector Kamakura is "the glutton of wandering" shortly, and Mr.
Sezaki (smile) did not come out in the bottom -- (although it had come out for a moment) However, since he likes a work called a millionaire detective from the first, I wish to evaluate there leniently.
Is evaluation "good"?

2007/02/05 Good [Original Japanese review]
by にゃん☆ Provider: 53230 Host:53095 Browser: 4487
Although it was the pattern with which the previous work was also alike, it was interesting also here.
If solving with money as usual is out of the question ...
まぁ -- enough -- he was able to be enjoyed

2006/12/29 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Naooki Provider: 33146 Host:32904 Browser: 4928
although only this millionaire detective did not see, a hero けて and is surprising in money -- I carry out ?
strategy とったり and think that it was interesting For the person who likes the work of a pure criminal thing, such works are けど which will be disagreeable.

2006/07/09 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by 五十嵐真紀 Provider: 3305 Host:3042 Browser: 3875
the comment to 今作 which it was strongly recommended to a friend and was seen ...
"-- what -- this ...
" -- so much .
A hero is too impudent.
Boss influence has been carried out at that impudent character and impudent attitude of Miwako Kobe...
今作 ...
For Igarashi, it was drama sufficient by just 1 話見る.
He likes the criminal drama and the detective drama individually.
It has fitted in considerably in animation "name detective Conan", and the evaluation here has also attached the "highest." Since "a detective and a detective thing" are classifications favorite to the next of a "hero thing" in Igarashi, if recommended, a certain grade sees and a large object has a good impression.
In a thing, it is 今作 to a thing!
.....
Expectation (Igarashi) was greatly betrayed.
Igarashi abhors "that to which I have gold", and the character which looks down on people.
Since it thought [ if it was original, ] that it was too severe although it was just going to attach with the "worst", and only one talk is seen, evaluation is "very bad."

2006/06/28 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by Ainshutain Provider: 11456 Host:11774 Browser: 6287
A previous work does not know.
It sees at first, and although cooked better, it 飽きed bored gradually and stopped seeing at the end.
Performance of fukakyon is transparent and cannot be considered to be good.
It is bad in whether it says.
Well, it is the drama of the grade that it tries to be free.

2006/06/23 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by Matsu Provider: 28338 Host:28220 Browser: 3846
impression called kana -- which has carried out the power down for a while than a previous work having only 飽きed bored simply -- かもしれませ .
Performance of fukakyon is also -- as usual.
The staff is a seed this time carrying out bad laver too much a little.
He cannot be enjoyed at all in the ability not to laugh at important small neta.

2006/05/17 Comment(good) [Original Japanese review]
by incoinco Provider: 14437 Host:14245 Browser: 6342
- seen to three talks.
For that Yasutaka Tsutsui has not come out compared with front series, and there being no phrase of profiting further after an incident, it is good - to actually (vainly ?) have applied money more than a previous work, although carried out by being dissatisfied (w).
A location, a dish, and a tool are really gorgeous.
Budget 使ってる drops off then just like a historical play, and it is しょ kana -.
The impression to which -- was digested [ whether the premised scenario has also got used and ] more than the previous work when the rich man was a detective.
although two talks are damashi which make Sting dim -- a scale - which may be large It is - which comes the more exactly in this work the more a scale is large.
It is -w, although I will feel that it is likely to become interesting in such meaning, if remade on the Hollywood movie.

2006/05/07 Good [Original Japanese review]
by TCC Provider: 9257 Host:9387 Browser: 4184
It is the kana it is [ kana ] tolerance level there enough since the surroundings have arranged veterans of oxidized silver, such as Mr.
Tokuma Nishioka and Mr.
Shinji Yamashita, although performance cannot say fukakyon as 巧い easily as usual.
As it is, it is kneaded also in story, and is rather interesting.
for example, although it is the talk of the "transfer fraud" of this week, the true criminal which played the good elder brother who cooperated in criminal investigation of heroes from the regret involved in the attempted fraud case, and a certain part-time jobber are remarkable -- 食わ -- a person -- it was .
fukakyon -- up to the place of one more step -- also cornering -- voice is not alike at all -- a partner -- frankly -- although [ barete ] it was stupid to have become business Conversely, it was successfully deceived by fukakyon and they were arrest and the もあっさり殺(ed) skin of a field with sufficient Ishihara certain は which it shows to a criminal's hiding place reluctantly.
although caught a little, it is finishing [ even if it deducts it ]-in work stabilized as sequel ?, and solves by carrying out performance of fukakyon to "good" evaluation presentation -- it is ........

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.