Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Drama ranking: Rank 931/in 993 titles (Total -9.90/Deviation 44.33) Rank 930 <= => Rank 932
Drama average points ranking: Rank 130/in 180 titles (Average -0.45(Good)/Deviation 44.10) Rank 129 <= => Rank 131 (more than 10 evaluatoin)
Drama ranking of 2005: Rank 51/in 60 titles Rank 50 <= => Rank 52

Gokusen yankumi(Drama)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Information about this title

Kozueko Morimoto YOU SHUEISHA
NIPPON TELEVISION NETWORK CORPORATION
Michiru Egashira
Michiru Ooshima
Kazuya Kamenashi
Satotoya
Yukie Nakama
Kazuya Kamenashi
Zin Akanishi Ken Kaneko
Katsuhisa Namase Shinji Uchiyama
Mocomichi Hayami Teppei Koike

Released:2005/01/15 in Japan End:2005/03/19 in Japan

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	DramaRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Good(-0.45)	931	44.33	-9.90

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	8,370	25	22
Outside Japan	265	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

4.5%

9.1%

22.7%

13.6%

18.2%

13.6%

18.2%

Added percentage

4.5%

13.6%

36.3%

49.9%

68.1%

81.7%

100%

Summary

36.3%

13.6%

50%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8
7 0 0 1 0 1 2 2 1

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/09/19 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by Baadakku Provider: 6794 Host:6761 Browser: 8090
....
It is not [ why ] more interesting than 1 like this.
This is severe although 1 is not an excessive lover well.
A trouble of an everyday scene -> student -> the student on whom -> やんくみ to which a student is involved in worthless 等 pushes down yakuza is regenerated.
の繰り返し.
It looks and gets tired.
It 飽きs bored.
It is made the center of attention to the luxury of the members of a performance, and has become the drama of only audience rating earnings of free.
The force of やんくみ of a friend Yuki blessing is insufficient.
But if the useless talk is excluded, it may be ....
which becomes an appropriate good talk.
It is evaluation "it is very bad."

2008/09/19 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by mind Provider: 29983 Host:29908 Browser: 8090

[Good point]
- John Kumi is looking and is taken as sukatt.
- The members of a teacher and worthless each one are individual, and interesting.
The place in which it is desperate for and is going to hide John Kumi's true character is the highest.
- The appearance of a bear.

[Bad point]
It is although differentiation is moreover also regarded as serious only by - boy because wholly poor.
-- A student does not have individuality!

[Comprehensive evaluation]
The 1st work is seldom seen (he remembers only the thing of a bear).
Therefore, the power down was not felt.
However, enough two to 3 話見れば.
Since it is one-track and there is much talk of 1 talk end, the next is not worrisome.
evaluation is bad -- coming out -- 。

2008/06/19 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by 陣兵 Provider: 18696 Host:18447 Browser: 3875

[Good point]
John Kumi of a student thought.
The friend Yuki blessing of starring is a role of hamari.

[Bad point]
The deployment from per second half of the talk is the same.

[Comprehensive evaluation]
The friend Yuki blessing of starring is a role of hamari.
But it is hateful that it is one pattern of "duel -> John Kumi rescuing [ a Yankee and 3D student ]" from per second half of the talk.
I want to also look at another pattern.
Evaluation is a "normal."

2008/06/10 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Naooki Provider: 4197 Host:4200 Browser: 8090
Since it was the part I lover, although part II was also seen, as for deployment, it was good that John Kumi scolded or protected a poor student from pine jun and others last time similarly [ deployment ] only by replacing 亀梨 and others last time similarly.

2008/06/01 Comment(good) [Original Japanese review]
by Bakaboke Provider: 29382 Host:29405 Browser: 7783(Mobile)
It is that this drama series-izes by no means.
-- Honest comment.
Although the first series was tempestuous Mr.
Matsumoto, were these roles of poor Mr.
亀梨 of KAT-TUN, and Mr.
赤西?
It is whether although the contents itself were almost the same as the first series or the third series broadcast now, it was well, interesting so so well.
deployment -- every degree of 毎 -- a degree -- although it is the same and is touch like Mito Komon, since it is the work with which a well broad age group is likely to be seen, it manufactures to the third series -- it would have .
evaluation is good -- coming out -- 。

2008/06/01 Comment(bad) [Original Japanese review]
by Shooto Provider: 26688 Host:26721 Browser: 7365

[Good point]
Friendship, the feeling of the gratitude to parents, etc.
are conveyed.

[Bad point]
School which is one-track and cannot exist.
It is looking and does not go down honestly.

[Comprehensive evaluation]
Although it turns out that he wants to tell, it is boring to be always the same [ the talk itself ].

2008/05/13 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Kanyako Provider: 5198 Host:5198 Browser: 8948

[Good point]
There is nothing.

[A bad point]

[Comprehensive evaluation]
by which John Kumi will come to help if the student with completely same a previous work and the talk fights for a friend and becomes the pinch It does not see any longer.

2007/12/28 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Acchan Provider: 18146 Host:17897 Browser: 6770
Previous work non-読 which is a drama in original non-読.
Did it hit considerably?
Although the previous work of a drama saw and did not become precocious, it was able to be enjoyed.
(ぽい which cannot be enjoyed if it is looking rather) John Kumi was smart.
However, something is those with a delicate feeling.
Although the last had some touch which forced impression, it sees on the whole and was interesting.

2007/11/17 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Sharu Provider: 1407 Host:1254 Browser: 5598
Although it has not viewed and listened to the first term series and not being viewed and listened to not much many talks, it is the work which was able to be seen and enjoyed.
I think that people of the cast were gorgeous and there was especially no unnatural point also in performance.
Although good acting of people of the cast of a poor group is also so, I think that especially the friend's good acting had shone.
although language usage was a little bad, the feeling which sympathizes with students had the impressive figure which comes out harder than others, stretches the body at a student's crisis and fights against it The setup a "female hot blood teacher" is new, is looking, and felt freshness.
Therefore, I am looking and thought that it was a work very "hot." A theme song and the last round also remain in an impression, and are carried out the bottom ...
At first, good acting of people of the cast shines and I regard the friend and a poor group as having been finished in the high work of a quality.
However, although it thinks that it is surely unavoidable on a setup, language usage's badness and the point which had much violence depiction are minus.
Therefore, from the work, grace was seldom felt but I regretted.
Although there was an impression which lacks in grace as the whole work, good acting of people of the cast, the story composition which can feel "heat" are finished in the high work of a quality, and was able to be seen and enjoyed in it.
However, the badness of the language usage who mentioned above, and the point with much violence depiction are big minus.
Although it thinks that it is unavoidable on the character of a work ...
Although it thinks that it is the work which was able to be enjoyed as the whole, in consideration of the above mentioned subtracting point, evaluation is made "good."

2007/09/27 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by Bakaboke Provider: 27679 Host:27547 Browser: 7783(Mobile)
It sees continuously from the first term series, and is a better seed.
There is also a good place both individually well and there is also a bad place.
Is it a といった neighborhood?
Although it is almost a faint memory, the message to tell etc.
thinks kana ?
from which the direction of the season here was transmitted to itself.
Evaluation usually comes out.

2007/09/18 Good [Original Japanese review]
by CRQ Provider: 18183 Host:18109 Browser: 3875
[Good point] It was likable to the student of the five new mains.
Did Mr.
[ especially / Mr.
亀梨 and Mr.
赤西 ] large-take a break taking advantage of this drama?
Since Mr.
亀梨 at this time did not put on airs but he was acting automatically, he was good.
[Bad point] Is it having carried out mannerism?
Although the 1st series was good, the 2nd series had too many formula and was sorry about them.
The 3rd series will not do truly.
[Comprehensive evaluation] Even if it changed the role of a student, was it regrettable very with the work which serves as mannerism in the 2nd series?
Comprehensive evaluation is good.

2007/08/11 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by 松山リサ Provider: 6141 Host:5980 Browser: 7142
Although it thinks that it obtains, is peevish in ~ っ, and is almost changeless in this, i.e., a previous work, ...
When it was transferred to the high school with the female teacher without a fearful thing brought up into wicked and そ(ed), the class which carries out Nantes charge was ワrukurasu of a school 1!!
How is a previous work differed from?
If a school side is [ John Kumi ] solution about rage and it for the poor scandal of a class when story deployment is also common, and the defect of a class causes the defect and trouble of other schools, it is quarreling and it is the John Kumi appearance in the place of the pinch ...
this work -- the point -- it can read -- passing -- it is .
It is the work which wanted the twist.
Incidentally a previous work is suki.
Because, it is since Mr.
Matsuyama kenichi has come out by ちょい役 (smile).

2007/08/09 Best! [Original Japanese review]
by 山崎C62竜二 Provider: 32756 Host:32761 Browser: 2851(Mobile)
It is a hama った drama, so that there is already no complaint point aimed at.
John Kumi, the friend, and Mr.
Namaze's Saruwatari deputy schoolmaster are the roles of hamari like a trick -- this debt of two persons was seen to pleasure each time if it says right [ that ] -- the Saruwatari deputy schoolmaster -- a student -- "-- last -- the mistake was made in crossing and being called " -- ?
are was laughed for honto if it can do -- again -- a sequel -- it wants 8 て

2007/07/23 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by Meteo Provider: 40410 Host:40430 Browser: 3162
It is the ぞ仲間 [ this ] Yuki blessing's role of hamari, and is the essence!!
A fine thing is good anyhow.
It could see on real time and was really good.
Performance of a preeminent coconut and a student also has [ the debt by the student ] a rather high level.
A natural posture atmosphere is also good !!
very.
The John Kumi banzai!!
Friend Yuki blessing elder sister banzai!!

2007/07/22 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by takudai Provider: 6693 Host:6493 Browser: 6016
Although it may meet when saying that there are no contents which also fit in and use performance with くせ of the friend Yuki blessing which was seen with DVD recently, and which was ordinarily interesting as this role, and also regard the role of a student as skillful, since it was not looking on real time, it says at the view of the world of poetic justice like Mito Komon.

2007/03/15 Good [Original Japanese review]
by ELT Provider: 2093 Host:2162 Browser: 6287
although it was, it carried out and, as for having been interesting, it does not understand where an audience rating and popularity came [ whose first (getting it blocked -- the first work) direction was interesting positively ] from However, it is just going to worry a little not announcing yet by floating the smell which is likely to have a sequel.
It is kana needless to say that the friend was the Hamah り役 --

2007/03/13 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by god Provider: 18003 Host:17951 Browser: 3023
the royal road -- it is ...
However, a story cannot say that it is good.
By there having not been, I regarded the last continuation of "it does not carry out very much" as ?
purposely.
Although the performance was gorgeous ...

2007/03/02 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by Ainshutain Provider: 5336 Host:5440 Browser: 6287
I did not think that it was good with other people being written so much as a drama.
However, the only help is that the friend had come out.

2007/01/31 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by Tsuki Provider: 15350 Host:15501 Browser: 6342
(Does this seem to be evaluation of the 2nd work?) It is the position in which only the direction of 2 moved since it was writing in the direction of the 1st work is seen.
the bad fellow of honesty and this hand -- violence -- defeating -- あぁかっ -- he does not so like the drama of the kind - whose deep - and deep friend increase Honestly some kakkoii 事言ってて of a friend Yuki blessing are also unimpressive.
I think that it is not suitable.
There are many fellows of only a face and students' are delicate.
It does not understand well that a story should just also be impressed where.
The talk when swerving likes a right course.
It is purely interesting, when John Kumi becomes maiden mode and has said some.
an after deputy schoolmaster teacher だったっけ -- student -- a current -- Katsuhisa was able to laugh considerably Adults, such as a man 2 person group which is present in the teachers of a staff room or John Kumi's house, are interesting.
Although the fellows of a class do not like it at all, do they like it?
In respect of a comedy, I think that it is a good work.

2006/08/25 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by Hasuraa Provider: 7325 Host:7100 Browser: 5234
It was not honestly got blocked.
It turns out what deployment it becomes only by seeing a preliminary announcement, and is the talk same each time.
an honest place -- why -- it does not understand [ whether noise was made to there, and ] well As the high audience rating was taken considerably, he did not care for it somehow but.

Next / Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.