Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Drama ranking: Rank 944/in 993 titles (Total -12.00/Deviation 43.53) Rank 943 <= => Rank 945
Drama ranking of 2005: Rank 53/in 60 titles Rank 52 <= => Rank 54

Oh-oku: Hana no Ran (Oh-oku: War of the Belles)(Drama)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Information about this title

Ishida Katsunori
Fuji Television
Rina Uchiyama Shosuke Tanihara Eiko Koike Saki Takaoka
Kazuki Kitamura Shinobu Nakayama Shihori Kanhiya Machiko Washio
Kaori Yamaguchi Maki Kubota Akisato Yamada
Hisako Manda Seiichi Tanabe Sei Hiraizumi Shouhei Hino
Ren Osugi Kimiko Yo KYOUKO ENAMI Norika Fujiwara

Released:2005/10/13 in Japan End:2005/12/22 in Japan

Official sites
1. http://www.fujitv.co.jp/b_hp/oh-oku_hana/backnumber/505000005-1.html (Translation)

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	DramaRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Bad(-1.50)	944	43.53	-12.00

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	2,994	8	8
Outside Japan	199	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

0.0%

12.5%

37.5%

25.0%

Added percentage

12.5%

25%

37.5%

75%

100%

Summary

12.5%

75%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 30
5 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 0

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/07/03 Good [Original Japanese review]
by 鯖鯖 Provider: 45216 Host:45208 Browser: 6342
Severe criticism Although it seems many On an individual target It harahara(ed) to deployment very well and expected each time.
This Although like [ in drama series ] in the 3rd work Previous work 2 work Although sense of incongruity viewed and listened only to a few greatly, enthusiastic performance of Uchiyama and Koike attracts an eye.
(although it is well so much and there is no image of a player usually) Takaoka Kitamura Presence is true.
In the ladies' chamber which the passage always carried out muddily Kitamura 演じる Yanagisawa The next general candidate is fabricated.
Inside of the view of the world closed although it was the talk planned to suddenly come into wealth Women's sadness is overflowing.
Evaluation is "good." you おっしゃる -- there is nothing at 醜作 [ like ] It is the kana of saw to the last.
If interesting douzo.

2006/07/09 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by 武信君 Provider: 11401 Host:11534 Browser: 4928
"-- the drama which the world who crosses should not call " only in about a demon, and should not be broadcast by gooruden -- increasing -- passing -- てい .
To be sure, it can be said that characters were people with the humanity to which power clung.
However, the maker side did not really have from a solution what he wanted to transmit to a televiewer in the least in the place which pulled out such women's true character to rear rutei by halves.
If called "じゃん to see objective", the problems will be the broadcasting hours of this work but till then.
should -- being also alike -- it is grim-looking if it becomes being the dead of power in the future with the comment which the young televiewer who cannot see objective looks at and are referred to as "whether to become such a wind if it grows up ..." Probably, as for the contents, a certain grade should have taken broadcasting hours into consideration.
Although he wants to incur the spirit which tackled the genre new as FUJI called the TV saga of a female subject, it can be said that the contents are perfect self-satisfaction of the manufacture people who do not consider a televiewer's thing at all.
Naturally, making in a sequel etc.
itself is with how it is ...
It was far kinder to also do re-broadcast of "鬼平" and "Zenigata Heiji", if it was such a thing.
Finally PTA is whether the direction which controlled such things has said rather than certain animation of a tele morning ...

2006/07/09 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by Anti666 Provider: 4442 Host:4395 Browser: 5234
Animation "巌窟王" is a great difference although it is the love-and-hate play developed in the gorgeous world.
Only by the deployment which can read the mere imitation and the point, since it is really boring, I cannot wish to see twice or more.
it is ridiculous to declare oneself a TV saga in this -- Mr.
Fuji Television

2006/06/26 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by Ainshutain Provider: 5336 Host:5340 Browser: 6287
Comment which look at this Argument of a woman is fearful.
It was made to think that it is really ugly.
There is also no theme song unsatisfactorily and odd touch was received.

2006/02/06 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by Matsu Provider: 36407 Host:36422 Browser: 3846
although the middle was interesting -- remaining in the impression in the drama of better たねこ since dare て in the second half -- Eiko Koike was fearful anyhow.
I thought that the drama of theme 歌こ was not suited.

2005/11/20 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by TCC Provider: 10534 Host:10814 Browser: 4184
no, Fuji Television -- a recently and mother complex dog -- the Imperial Court -- it seems that he likes Tsunayoshi Tokugawa ("the man called -" is not broadcast this year -- as -- but) It comes with the Kanei era, and although the Genroku bubble era seems to be the stage shortly, "it is already good" is the first impression in such women's ugly mudslinging in the end of a curtain.
the cast -- Rina Uchiyama -- such leading role 〓〓-- it is not an actress with a flower [ like ], either -- it carries out and Eiko Koike is also cheap miscasting It cannot be denied that it is the staff which Norika Fujiwara [ decline of fortune now ] is also inferior compared with two works ............
and a front, and does.
since it is 歌ばっ which does not have the contents only by excessive words attracting an eye in the theme song ?
Shiina apple of the "Tokyo incident" etc., or 4 style singers who have sung, it is unattractive 1000% -- っす .
the evaluation which "is very bad as for this" although the Kanei era series was able to be seen somehow ..........
although an important signboard and the moon 9 "dangerous aneki" are trashes -- the latest fujidorama -- somehow -- neta -- a piece -- as .............

2005/11/18 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by 634 Provider: 13637 Host:13465 Browser: 5234
Contents which have been completely defeated by even the NHK and go る with a background although NHK announces the TV saga of the Tomiko Hino hero "乱 of a flower" about ten years ago and excels in the same title.
The work which is touch called the historical play version "a very strange tale." Although it was to it when saying that it became like this, since it was Fuji Television, merihari etc.
was not effective at all.
It is a problem not to want to see, since female ugly ego is an exposed scene in women's power struggle etc., and to leave hetappi actresses primarily itself.
since it is condition "even a famous actor takes out and ゃ is good", that there is no mind which carries out a program and drama structure directly should also visit Fuji Television at the same feeling as a drama being a neta piece and doing 1 time "Furuhata duties Saburo" per year recently -- so .
Although this is not the problem restricted to FUJI ...
It is greatly a question about whether although only the works with which only famous actors bring together in what [ to stop ], and televiewers get bored are built, the audience rating rise is carried out only by such thing.
Now, the direction of a year-end historical play is mashi to 遥.

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.