Table

Rokubanme no Sayoko(Drama)

Other media
Novel:The sixth Sayoko(Rokubanme no Sayoko)

Reviews' statics

Drama rank	Rank 111/in 1,007 titles (Total 15.00)	Rank 110 <= => Rank 112
Drama average pnts rank	Rank 35/in 186 titles (Average 1.50(Very good))	Rank 34 <= => Rank 36
Drama rank of 2000	Rank 8/in 34 titles	Rank 7 <= => Rank 9

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Image gallery

Information about this title

Riku Onda Shinchosha
Yuko Miyamura
Coba
Anne Suzuki Takehiro Murata Chiaki Kuriyama Jun Miho
Takayuki Yamada Marika Matsumoto Takahiro Ito Sae Isshiki Ryo Katsuji Michiko Ishihashi Masato Furuoya Kenta Uchino Yumi Takigawa
Yuka Hirata Manami Fuji

Released:2000/04/08 in Japan End:2000/06/24 in Japan

Official sites
1. http://www.nhk.or.jp/drama/archives/sayoko/ (Translation)

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	DramaRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Very good(1.50)	111	53.77	15.00

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	5,036	12	10
Outside Japan	403	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

10.0%

30.0%

60.0%

0.0%

Added percentage

10%

40%

100%

100%

Summary

100%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14
10 2 0 1 0 2 1 1 3

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) All
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	All

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/07/07 Best! [Original Japanese review]
by 一花くらら Provider: 8466 Host:8457 Browser: 5237
What does it next become?
Next week will be the work after a long time which very came to be very impatient.
Although the original was read after seeing this, was I good at occult mystery ちっく with uncannier this one?
Although everyone becomes a suspect whenever it sees how many persons whether it involved involving existence of the mystery of Sayoko who has blocked who is Sayoko, the last is shapely collected as it is unexpected, and if it finishes seeing, there is invigoration.
Suzuki -- a cast called an apricot and Chiaki Kuriyama -- very much -- having been attractive .

2007/07/18 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by muu Provider: 8133 Host:8048 Browser: 7321
Although it thought that it did not see by any means in the drama of nhk etc., its brilliant junior high school student days hama って was carried out, and it waited.
- なったっけな [ liking ] also in Mr.
Yamada here.
When considering now, it was a fairly good cast set.

2007/04/01 Good [Original Japanese review]
by 三段 Provider: 12953 Host:13058 Browser: 6342
In the drama of the NHK education, it is Ryosaku.
"school horror -- although it was みたいな laver -- the second half -- who is sayoko?" -- seeing -- the deployment [ た / deployment ] よ-...
which is not necessarily a woman.
It said that it was quite fearful, or the challenge ?
younger brother to devised sayoko was saying and kyara(ing) the dangerous thing.
The cast was gorgeous when considered now ...
Evaluation "is good." a horror color -- the flow and merihari of the thick first half and the suspense-second half were good

2007/01/07 Comment(good) [Original Japanese review]
by 夙夜健 Provider: 18384 Host:18446 Browser: 6287
since it is indebted here since one year passed -- fresh spirit -- returning -- ?
In the work commented for the first time I think that the 2nd writing will be carried out.
Although seemingly it was the first DVD-ized work in NHK in the heard talk, it was the work which has suitable impressiveness in it.
It was called the mystery, or viewing-and-listening volition excited at the place of the suspense style, and he was able to be enjoyed as heroes' growth tale.
The last, as for the portion which thinks whether the transfer student was whom and what Sayoko was really, a certain thing lingers on was beautiful, and it was good that it was what remains in the heart.
Being individual and the hit where Sayoko's 1st true character is revealed are thrilling.
Does he like?

2006/01/29 Good [Original Japanese review]
by 羽楽 Provider: 11560 Host:11664 Browser: 3875
If it considers now, he will have an unexpected feeling to have done the thing of such horror flavor in NHK.
Atmosphere and the story were impressive.
It sees bikubiku(ing) by being fearful those days, and is a shelf ...
It was the story which the point worries, and it was unexpected when the person who made especially the Sayoko tradition understood.
I think that it is kneaded very well from the beginning to the last.
Although re-broadcast several times, it is the drama regarded as my wanting you to carry out.
On an individual target

2006/01/23 Good [Original Japanese review]
by 無線機 Provider: 22647 Host:22353 Browser: 4487
Although it was delicate something, it was looking every week.
It was the work which quite mysterious touch carries out.
Also touch whose quality seems to be high ..
I think that it was rather [ on the whole ] good.

2006/01/07 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by 夙夜健 Provider: 17942 Host:17881 Browser: 3646
Many favorite works are "sixth Sayoko ", although it has not been made the highest evaluation since it is.
I think that it is the masterpiece which remains in a teleplay in history.
A story has the place which is not known more and wanted to see a realistic conclusion as a mystery maniac.
(it is though it may be difficult) .
However, the player who appeared thinks that he was the rare work which was able to feel not only the inside of a drama but the process which actually shines and grows.
Suzuki who played especially the hero -- it was felt such to the apricot Although Chiaki Kuriyama was impressive in respect of the beauty girl, the apricot of the last round was wonderful.
Everybody including her made the peculiar world in shut space which is called a junior high school.
It is thought that the brightness which they showed with this work was able to exist just because it was it at this time.

2005/11/07 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Anmitsu Provider: 4661 Host:4534 Browser: 5234
being [ in-some-places impact / at ほん / NHK ] ?
って thought ます Therefore, this which is seen wholly is quite a つわ thing.
It is not finished in very much such a good touch work.
.
Well [ ちゃ ], omission looked somewhere, there was no it and the place was also good.
The Sayoko って and a system (?) are impressed.
Since the original has not read, it does not understand.
but this drama -- it can の -- I think that it is very best .
Although it may a little differ from seeing and enjoying oneself all together, even if it saw individually, it was interesting, and he sees and was also interesting.
.

2005/10/17 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by Matsu Provider: 12344 Host:12176 Browser: 3846
It was the drama of a mystery atmosphere.
if it sees now -- Suzuki -- the apricot and Mr.
Takayuki Yamada Ms.
Chiaki Kuriyama It is the gorgeous cast.
Wonderful music which flows in the back "motamesomotemase" Since it is audible so that a "boss minodominasu" repetition woman may murmur, it is uncanny very.

2005/05/15 Good [Original Japanese review]
by 慶 Provider: 18319 Host:18132 Browser: 5234
Although it was the story which is not not at all dreadfully from the first (original), this drama is uncanny somehow.
Therefore, a few is impressive and thinks ii.
Or [ that the method of the 見た here is more interesting than novel 読む ].

2005/04/25 Comment(good) [Original Japanese review]
by incoinco Provider: 14437 Host:14245 Browser: 5234
The drama which does not understand ずーっ and the whole aspect and is worried.
- which is occasionally, without [ the summer vacation or ] the ability never seeing all although it carries out why as come out and collected る- to which it was forever caught in kokoro and only illusion of being interesting has swollen too especially since music with that feeling of tension can all be seen very much by the thing by catch.
Of course, a number of times are - which cannot hold a story in the least if it is it, although carried out by the reason for looking.
- whose 砂粧 Taeko was also the same situation when saying so.
Situation situation.
Incidentally, the twins detective which was being done before this is - which he likes very much and has also bought the original (they are triplets here).
- which it is not related and is sumaso.
^^;

2005/04/24 Good [Original Japanese review]
by 涙 Provider: 15935 Host:15793 Browser: 4483
SF currently broadcast in NHK -- school monochrome [ tic ] The student who does the one-person play "Sayoko" will come out once in 3.
The person chosen as "Sayoko" has to complete a play so that it may not be disclosed.
But it was different this year.
There is two "Sayoko".
[ this year ] -- It was regrettable that Mr.
Tsumura did not understand after all whether you were whom -- since -- when extending the broadcast period to a slight degree, possibly it did not grow into a cramming indigestion Although there was also a gikochinai portion a little, since performance suited the character which it is going to do as hard as possible in which it was a hero conversely, it was looking and it was not irritated.
Moreover, that uncanny music with which OP is decorated was a jar individually.
Once it heard it despite short music, was it the music which is not forgotten and which remained in the impression in the good meaning?
It was looking being exciting each time, since it was also light inference monochrome.
It is that they were ano people to have made the Sayoko tradition first -- Was it unexpected?
Synthetically, it is "good."

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.