Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Drama ranking: Rank 896/in 962 titles (Total -8.00/Deviation 45.06) Rank 895 <= => Rank 897
Drama ranking of 2006: Rank 64/in 76 titles Rank 63 <= => Rank 65

SHIN MOMOTAROH ZAMURAI(Drama)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Information about this title

TV Asahi TOEI
Okumuratoshio Satoru Okamoto Rei Izumi
Koji Kikkawa Ichiro Ishikawa
Masahiro Takashima
Yasuko Tomita
Tamao Nakamura
Tonpei Hidari

Released:2006/07/25 in Japan

Official sites
1. http://www.tv-asahi.co.jp/momotarou/index.html (Translation)

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	DramaRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Very bad(-1.60)	896	45.06	-8.00

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	1,164	6	5
Outside Japan	84	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

20.0%

Added percentage

20%

40%

80%

100%

Summary

20.0%

80%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13
4 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation New!
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation New!
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2006/09/04 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by 阿部怪異 Provider: 5923 Host:5812 Browser: 3646
Even if it compares with the Hideki Takahashi version and does not compare, does it become evaluation of a disrepute system?
I think truly that an original is the work which is not compared.
ね which will not be referred to since the theater version of the Ichikawa 雷蔵 also has the contents completely different from the thing of familiarity.
although the previous work was also the inside 々能 weather -- the Takashima version -- "-- whether it is the directivity of " happily or it is a technique have shifted brightly peach Taro too much seldom sympathizes by simple baka, and the tile version store does not suit a historical play, and it is alike and does not hakkiri [ stopping ] whether it is considering as a setup whether since the twins, Mr.
Tono, are involved in the talk, it is a bad man -- what -- bad to かてき and - don't shine thing 8 -- how - and about are drawn Although a public historical play may be that wrong has monotone-ized on the whole, even if it makes a member great to a slight degree -- It is whether described, so that it sees on the whole and a character feels charm.
Although it shines in a use if it is a stereotype, the thing with shallow making a character does not become in any way.
About a sword fight, perfect Momotaro Takahashi and 比ぶべく are not at splendor, either.
-- Sense of stability is not in the waist somehow.
Although such elements were not felt when the Araki 又右衛門 was performed by "Yagyu 10 soldier 衛 match [ of No.
7 ] Shimabara Uprising", did that it was going to devise backfire?
although the sword is used violently -- being also strong -- it does not look smartly "Unnecessary no 介" Although rolled well, and it also cut or being carried out now, it has been visible to unnecessary hard-fight.
And the punch line in this last scene also lacks in invigoration in the voice into which power went vainly.
The villain also thinks it a cause not to be drawn so that it may be dignified.
In the worst-case scenario, peach Taro is a demon's faces.
-- Kana evaluated a little violently.
For the time being, I think that the motivation of the staff at the time of "common Shigeko companion wolf" is a work 座成りな like it means having flown where at a question.

2006/08/22 Comment(bad) [Original Japanese review]
by 宇宙刑事ジャンギャバン Provider: 33223 Host:33285 Browser: 6287
Since Ms.
Yasuko Tomita who plays the heroine is appearing on the TV saga before, isn't a historical play the first?
It says well very, and although there is no こたあ, performance seen as it is is carried out.
hiromi of the tile version store a few should carry out vocal exercises.
having only talked ordinarily by the historical play -- じゃ -- useless -- しょ Once, although there was peach Taro's punch line, a thing [ how ] is what is refused to the mother one by one?
it will not also be a mazakon って reason -- alike -- 。 Does Mr.
Takahashi count and in what and an impression doesn't it remain compared with a song?

2006/08/22 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by 捲追911 Provider: 6911 Host:6871 Browser: 4184
the motion of the scuffle which is the highlight of an important historical play lacks brilliance -- it carried out and the punk also with a somehow cheap punch line has talked -- it feels, and it comes out and brightness peculiar to a historical play is missing To and hame used also as the Takahashi version of a previous work in comparison which is not needed because the name of a "peach Taro samurai" is used for a title Kana which is the historical play which does not not much have the place which shines though regrettable.
Evaluation is the "worst."

2006/08/22 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by 曲がり角のアイツ Provider: 40763 Host:40597 Browser: 4483
Although it is not "Ooka Echizen", by the historical play, I think in the latest tele morning that it is the safe result.
Although it turns out that a bad thing merely compares with a previous work, the contents of imaichi are thin.
unnecessary -- the woman of exaggerated performance -- although the favorite peach is kyara interesting to be sure, it carries out and, as for the falter of a scuffle, the thing which is not felt and which can never be allowed has the charm like Mr.
[ Hideki Takahashi ] too Probably, better evaluation was attached, when the name of a "peach Taro samurai" was not entitled but it was making as new work as there was indication.
Very regrettable, because there is also a portion with which kyara with the taste of Tamao Nakamura or Tompei Hidari etc.
is shining.
Evaluation is "bad."

2006/08/08 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by TCC Provider: 10714 Host:10998 Browser: 4184
Although original does not know, Mr.
Takashima thinks that he is doing his best as it is, though a motion is rude.
Rather, a thing with cheap Mr.
hiromi who does not take Ms.
Tamao Nakamura or recently for patt and surrounding cast thinks problem ant kana [ thing ] with it being individual.
being only stable if it says there well although the talk is seized on and moved to friendship with も and the hero who are requested to bury a political opponent from great さん of a han this week in order to wipe away the dishonor dressed by success in life and the father, and refusal, both defeating, etc.
are poetic justice things at the last moment -- a part -- existence of miscasting and the sword fight as which force is seldom felt -- I regret although it does not go to a heavy fault which is well still referred to as fatal and is a little sweet -- evaluation -- "-- the kana usually made into "

2006/07/26 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by 宇宙刑事ジャンギャバン Provider: 33223 Host:33285 Browser: 4314
Let's buy TV morning sun which revived the legendary TV historical play broadcast by Hideki Takahashi Mr.
starring for the first time in a quarter of a century, and Mr.
Masahiro Takashima's enthusiasm for five years from 1976 to 1981.
It is made to spread....
The result is the place called 50 points.
Since it will compare with it of Mr.
Takahashi too although the directivity which is [ how ] different was aimed at, if it is named the "peach Taro samurai" at all.
First, !!
fighting scene.
It is said to 氏 that it is impolite as for this to already compare with Mr.
Takahashi.
Since it could not try to kick and the beauty of a sword fight had that flowing thing that does not allow other historical play actors' imitation fully.
Although it was doing its best, as for Mr.
Takashima, a rude motion Even if it makes it an appearance scene, it has lost at production.
Do I want the words of the arrangement which Mr.
Takahashi counts and is equal to a song too?
A setup with which he says that it was followed by the house as a daimyo's son as a baby although peach Taro, a hero, was twins' younger brother therefore is the same as a previous work.
Although the face was suddenly united in the first talk ....
A better seed, well [ the different characters of twins' 弟役 are played well, and ].
1000 generation was the mother-in-law of the hero who Tamao Nakamura Mr.
扮, and interesting kyara.
It may be attractive although it is a nagging mother.
or [ having not given one's name in a "peach Taro samurai" by force, although it was glad that a super hero appeared in a historical play ] Probably, it does not suit comparatively, since it is compared with Mr.
Hideki Takahashi, however it may do.

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.