Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Drama ranking: Rank 756/in 972 titles (Total -0.99/Deviation 47.75) Rank 755 <= => Rank 757
Drama ranking of 1989: Rank 10/in 11 titles Rank 9 <= => Rank 11

Tonderu! Hiraga Gennai(Drama)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Information about this title

TBS TOEI
Akiko Hamura Nobuyuki Onishi
Tetsuya Yamanouchi Kiyomi Yada
Izumi Taku
Michio Yamagami Toshiyuki Nishida
Yuriko Ishida Shinnosuke Ikehata Eitaro Matsuyama
Yakumaru Hirohide HIROSHI TSUBURAYA Takumi Tsutsui Kanichi Tani Masao Komatsu
Kawai Nobuo Takuya hujioka Hisaya Morishige
Akutagawatakayuki

Released:1989/05/08 in Japan End:1989/09/18 in Japan

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	DramaRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Good(-0.33)	756	47.75	-0.99

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	1,125	4	3
Outside Japan	85	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

0.0%

66.7%

33.3%

0.0%

Added percentage

66.7%

100%

Summary

66.7%

33.3%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 6 5 4 3 2 1 31 30
2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2007/02/28 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by 捲追911 Provider: 48832 Host:48733 Browser: 5234
Although expectation was also made moderate since it was made from the idea which changed considerably as a historical play work of those days, the duty of the connector of "Mito Komon" was moreover borne, it left "Ooka Echizen" and "Edo having been cut" and it was broadcast to the moon 8 Though individually regrettable, doesn't it reach distantly [ cut / Edo / to early Mito Komon, Ooka Echizen, and it ] in the historical play broadcast at least with the petty work to the moon 8 until now?
although there is a place which cannot get used to Mr.
Toshiyuki Nishida's kyara individually -- the atmosphere of this work -- Gennai Hiraga -- rather than -- Mr.
Nishida -- it is said that it remains as it is -- when feeling, coming out and receiving in the good meaning, although it fitted in and could also be called the role, imaichi admiration had not been wiped to Mr.
Nishida since the apt beginning to which it was so viewing and listening Although it is largest that liking does not only suit as for this neighborhood.
And although it was the portion from which the historical play work of others [ place / which strengthened the comedy color to ordinary poetic justice monochrome ] is different, in the case of this work, it could not laugh at the portion of this comedy at all individually, but it was spoiled.
Even displeasure will be memorized in that hame is removed so far and it cannot independently be laughed at all that real Gennai Hiraga's kyara was perverted although there is no intention of saying that time historical investigation was disregarded etc., and you may ignore a little in time historical investigation etc.
as long as it is interesting.
And because the face of the members of a supporting player was good poor, it was still uneasier, and it comes out [ it is said somehow whether it became, consider and ] and was full to a slight degree.
Evaluation is "bad."

2006/08/03 Comment(bad) [Original Japanese review]
by Marin Provider: 30606 Host:30431 Browser: 3846
It is looking only several times.
It was very felt old that Okitsugu Tanuma was drawn wicked, and it has closed viewing and listening immediately.

2006/08/03 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by 宇宙刑事ジャンギャバン Provider: 33223 Host:33285 Browser: 4314
Oh, was there also such any historical play?
Since Mr.
villain actor and Kawai 伸旺 who passed away lately were doing the regular performance with the role of a north town magistrate, it is っけ the bottom.
And it is slightly stupid and is the role which cannot be hated.
Takuya Fujioka Mr.
演じる -- a senior shogunal councilor -- although - Okitsugu Tanuma is also covetous -- somewhere human being -- he had a stinking feeling That that seems to be right and for the first time in [ criminal investigation 頓珍漢な in the master of 赤垣 ] were pleasant.
As for Mr.
Komatsu, such roles match well.
As [ be / thin / except the Peter 演じる neutrality--somehow kyara / the impression / although Nishida Mr.
演じる Gennai Hiraga had many friends / ....
]

2006/08/03 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by 曲がり角のアイツ Provider: 40763 Host:40597 Browser: 4483
Unique 作 broadcast by the so-called "national theater" frame of the TBS system at Monday night 8:00.
However, compared with "Mito Komon" and the work of "cutting Edo", it is simple and minor existence, and is the work which is inferior also one step and 2 step.
Charm is hardly felt probably.
If it was "Mito Komon" and was 弥 7, 8 soldier 衛, and "cutting Edo", attractive kyara was equal to ゆき.
However, in 本作, in spite of having arranged the gorgeous members of a performance, the admiration embarrassed with kyara is strong, and a setup called Yuriko Ishida's twins does not function effectively, either, but has brought a result which must be given up from the middle.
Each material is in the halfway result with the more absurd talk, as a result of stuffing too much, although it was good.
Even if the purple hood came out, there is no showy scuffle and it accelerated a conclusion, that is, plainness in Hakushu.
The deployment of the "Mito Komon" style of the middle stage cannot be obtained, either.
however, a reason, the Kawai 伸旺氏演じる Kitamachi magistrate, and Nose -- very -- Shiro -- the -- humorous -- for the first time in -- the good acting which cannot be regarded as the direction which was very wonderful and was playing the villain usually very much -- it was .
"Whether you carry out the kiln of what dotage this time" was pleasure of 本作.
Negotiations with Takuya Fujioka and having become the popular person of 本作きって by bachiri also give a nod of assent.
Then, the TV historical play itself will see dusk with the current of the times, the popular series which continued supporting "Ooka Echizen" and this frame referred to as "Cutting Edo" closed the curtain one after another, and decline of "Mito Komon" of its only hope was enhanced.
such meaning -- stuffing -- passing -- coming out -- although it was, 本作 may be being able to call it the last work filled with "national theater-likeness" Evaluation is helped by Mr.
Kawai's good acting and is "common."

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.