Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews
Others
Site map

AllAnimeGameComicNovelDramaSp. effectJP movieMovieInfo:voice,game..ReviewersDiary
Search / Outside DB:

Drama ranking: Rank 928/in 957 titles (Total -21.96/Deviation 39.73) Rank 927 <= => Rank 929
Drama average points ranking: Rank 148/in 175 titles (Average -1.22(Bad)/Deviation 37.94) Rank 147 <= => Rank 149 (more than 10 evaluatoin)
Drama ranking of 2004: Rank 38/in 42 titles Rank 37 <= => Rank 39

Water Boys2(Drama)


[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)
ForumImages
Information about this title

Shinobu Yaguchi
Hiroshi Hashimoto
Naoki Sato
Hisashi Fuwa
Masaharu Fukuyama
Hayato Ichihara Akiyoshi Nakao Keita Saito Teppei Koike Kimura Ryou
Satomi Ishihara Reina Asami Emi Suzuki
Takatoshi Kaneko Sayaka Yamaguchi Waka Inoue

Released:2004 in Japan
Official sites
1. http://www.fujitv.co.jp/waterboys2/index2.html (Translation)
Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)
 AverageDramaRankDeviation(Total)Evaluation points(Total)Best of the Best
Inside JapanBad(-1.22)92839.73-21.96 

Statics of activity

Total ViewsCommentEvaluation
Inside Japan14,3021818
Outside Japan52100

How others evaluated in Japan

BestVery GoodGoodNormalBadVery BadWorst
People0032463
Percentage0.0%0.0%16.7%11.1%22.2%33.3%16.7%
Added percentage0%0%16.7%27.8%50%83.3%100%
Summary16.7%11.1%72.2%
                                                                                                  

Views for recent 8 days
Total765432131
12
0
0
0
1
2
4
4
1

LanguageSorted by dateSorted by recommendation New!
EnglishGood
(Only Evaluation)
Normal
(Only Evaluation)
Bad
(Only Evaluation)
All
(Only Evaluation)
None
JapaneseGood
(Only Evaluation)
Normal
(Only Evaluation)
Bad
(Only Evaluation)
All
(Only Evaluation)
All
This reputation board


Post your review / Top page
The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/03/09 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by 石鯉 Provider: 31011 Host:31181 Browser: 8090
It was the work which fell [ that it is various and ].
Since the talk became weak, I did and the level of gag had also fallen.
Since the last round has not been impressed, either, it is なあ.
-- Above all, the scene of a synchronization was bad.
Since the form collapsed, I did it and the difficulty of work was also more low till then.
Although it was good well that seriousness had come out as usual.
It is "bad."
2007/08/12 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Sharu Provider: 1407 Host:1250 Browser: 5598
It is the work which was able to be enjoyed although a quality is inferior to a previous work.
The process which a friend is assembled [ process ] little by little, and friendship is deepened [ process ] like a previous work, and completes synchronization performance was impressive.
However, was there never about the same impact as a previous work ...
Does a mere-imitation-element become strong if series is piled up too?
Evaluation is made "good."
2007/08/07 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by 樹梨葉 Provider: 32756 Host:32737 Browser: 2864(Mobile)
Is evaluation bad?
since it is re-broadcasting now -- now -- なが et al.
-- evaluating -- ちゃいます Although the movie is not looking, since the previous work was good, it feels thing insufficient sure.
I feel that a setup of a female student is too bad.
Only the character which merely gives displeasure is just because the number and power are tops in former woman quantity how much.
the heels of a previous work, and the adults who obstruct -- being dear -- it was however, it is what -- it bit -- since it sees -- common .

2006/12/23 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by 佐々成政 Provider: 24296 Host:24206 Browser: 5234
It is this work to have made the specific gravity of a love element high compared with the movie version and the previous work.
Individually, 3 作中最 are also likable.
A supporting player's Suzuki えみ is very dear.
whether Satomi Ishihara, the heroine, also has kyara perfect for the job made into ゆう tsun like this, and ?
-- when -- there is nothing -- performance -- skillful く感じ better た
2006/08/24 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Ainshutain Provider: 11396 Host:11621 Browser: 6287
Now, it can come by re-broadcast around 4:00, and some are done.
It is looking once.
They are what or 見ちゃいます although it does not think that it is extraordinarily good.
Although evaluation here is fairly bad, it does not regard me as bad to there.
し [ it can sympathize also with Mr.
泳吉 of a hero ].
I want to come to aid.
Since troubles were suffered when it was not so their favorite that I also swim and it was small, it will be able to do its best too many and will say in !
and the heart.
Although honesty and Satomi Ishihara do not like it so, she is also looking at the love element happily.
Although it is one-track to be sure, since it is individually pleasant, it is "good."
2006/08/17 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by Y I Provider: 1598 Host:1650 Browser: 4184
It said clearly and was not felt more interesting than a previous work.
The impression of deployment of the mere imitation was strong and there was brand-new [ almost no ].
The cast is also inferior compared with the previous work or the movie version.
It may be not coming out of and making a sequel easy just because the direction of others is as 仰る popularity.
Since it is surely compared with a previous work.
Evaluation "is worsened very much." Because 1 was very good, I can think the movie version more so.

2006/08/16 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by SHUNIA Provider: 3391 Host:3322 Browser: 5540
[Good point + description] Well, it is the same as a previous work that five members have a problem, respectively.
今作 begins from the place into which the hero who is uninterested about anything has moved, and if I will do "a synchronization" in school, it will be invited.
And a synchronization will be done, eye members' collection is overcome the first half, a problem is overcome the second half, and it is to synchronization realization.
Or [ that come out and what is good ] ...
About [ that the stage changed to the country further ].
[A bad point] having made from popular riding -- しか -- the drama which cannot be considered of "having done" The thing [ it is the same as that of "the so-called matrix" and so-called "terminator 3", since it was popular, a sequel is made, and ] that the previous work was better as a result.
What was necessary was just to have completed by the previous work, if that was right, and 今作 was also made from riding and failed in it.
"A synchronization" which is the highlight of the last round as to what it is bad.
If it thinks generally, it will restrict to this.
At a previous work, although the new thing was incorporated in addition to performance of the movie version, a thing new at 今作 does not have anything.
Since it is what was altogether seen by the previous work, it is already tired.
There are also many people who look at only this performance of the last round.
Of course, probably, it expects because a problem is overcome and performed as it is.
However, it is "regret which starts like a previous work, finishes similarly and remains." It is a lack [ originality ].
[Others] "Love elements" are also many works most among water boys.
In the previous work, I hear that almost was hidden in the heart and the conclusion was attached in the end, and it was collected appropriate for "youth." They are an inmate and 惹かれ合っていく, after the woman student who takes out love love light with 今作 from the first half to a hero earnestly appears and 片 with her is attached.
In separation of the last round, it was deployment like a love drama.
Conversely, if it says, it will also be the work with which love fruited most in water boys.
Probably, but tastes were divided [ whether this is good and ].
Although there is becoming late by about [ which wore except its own thing and incidentally ran shoes at once ashore ] in order not to get used, it does not become "the crack which bleeds by the shoe sore or becomes swollen." [Remarks] The work which should have been made to finish it as a previous work and "which has been given." Of course, although the story is different if you want to see deployment to performance, if it tries come to expect the last performance, since it will only repent, recommendation is not carried out.

2006/07/13 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by 綾波 億彦 マジカルシュガー Provider: 12151 Host:12308 Browser: 3875
Although it had said that this had an interesting mother.
Honestly, a story is together with a previous work.
This is not got blocked any longer.
me who looked at the theater version and was impressed -- already -- 2 is tight Evaluation is the "worst."
2006/02/05 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by Matsu Provider: 36407 Host:36422 Browser: 3846
Because the previous work and theater version was also interesting, although it expected -- It was not interesting though it was regrettable.
it obtains, even if it sees this, and a sequel is not needed -- I thought -
2006/01/25 Good [Original Japanese review]
by rangame Provider: 41922 Host:41919 Browser: 4184
Wasn't it touch that it could not see to the place sake which calls it the series first sight of the score, or is looking at only this, or there?
Although unreasonable [ of dampish harassment of female students or Kayo Oba ] becomes empty without being able to deny the touch called going too far.
[ a little ] Usually, although it talked and や演技見てる, a honto actress, or ?
(it does not carry out now [ of a fan / 方す ]) was thought, when it was 今作, it was not so much worrisome by about [ which was made into Satomi Ishihara's bosoboso っ / which is regarded as their being 分まあ with the original molding portion of kyara, and kyara said like this ], and each one of a synchronization part was rather individual, is looking, and also had the portion of being interesting.
it is usually easy to depend evaluation -- I want to come out
2005/12/27 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by 無線機 Provider: 21233 Host:21119 Browser: 4487
Unlike a previous work, he has an uncanny trash feeling.
Although a few was expected, it has already given up because of eye one talk.
Although seen to the last after all, the idea did not change.
It is bad at touch to which deployment also resembled the previous work.

2005/08/15 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by FIRE Provider: 39002 Host:38985 Browser: 4184
Is it clear that the quality of a work has fallen off as series progresses?
After seeing the movie, this was seen and stripes were carried out disappointedly.
Although it was somewhat uneasy when the 1st work of a drama was seen, this work made the uneasiness guess right splendidly.
neta degrades a belt further using a previous work, performs well the cast and the school life only whose persons who do not consider as quite satisfactory patt are one of the tastes of this drama above all, and has not run out.
Seeing the quality of more than this and a masterpiece already fall off rapidly cannot bear.
I want you to carry out finally.

2005/03/27 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by Esupaa Provider: 5974 Host:6051 Browser: 4184
When a manufacture announcement of this was made, did you think "With what isn't the sequel of the movie version made?
douu you undershirt sutan?"?
Although it was the result of kuso っぷり to which the previous work also betrayed the fan of the movie version earnestly, as for 今作, the rate of kuso is rising further.
it was too poor at performance, and そりゃ was also obtained and withered Was that youth さ of the movie version unreproducible?
It can do, can do and is だぜ ...
Whenever it often sees an appearance shelf and that CM by CM those days, anger springs, and they are a seed and maji.
It gets carried away and drama-izes and has not rubbed.

2005/03/27 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Ura Provider: 51192 Host:51185 Browser: 5234
It was not interesting at all.
Although this series was not fond from the first, 1 was still better.
The movie will hear Ryosaku, although it has not seen, and this is the series worst.
First of all, already useless [ considering performance ].
Performers were not being seen by the useless set.
It cannot be understood for a story why popularity came out of wanting what to say in the thing with what [ interesting ], either.
I want it to stop to do this series more than this.

2005/02/22 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by 向井大輔 Provider: 35453 Host:35471 Browser: 4184
"-- it came out and came out -- detazo and 裸族 came out - [!?
] -- the figure which it wants to shout, ", and even sea bread comes out and loiters around it indeed -- an eye -- being printed -- てい .
It has already been disagreeable at this time.
There is also no どぎゃ - and こにゃ - truly.
a fat person -- and a leg's and ろ -- it was also rather impossible to choose a woman with that right as the child of a land part too much the scene which runs -- body double -- せな やろ not opening Seeing a start of a woman without true くそ instantaneous power, the elder sister of the mother of the adviser of a land part and the adviser of a basketball part is っ and り better た which are laughed at which and wound.
the writer by whom had been called "the high-speed young noble" -- げんなりっす .
It is speed.
It is あん, and is it る?
it is reason ねぇ of a land part -- ろ
2005/02/22 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by C.Q. Provider: 10337 Host:10090 Browser: 5978
Although 1 of a drama was not looking, since there was that it is sequel みたい here when a movie was telecast, although [ the ] it tried to flow out, and the movie was good, it was boring here.
When it found that said or the movie had one effort re-broadcast in the New Year of thing kana ?
this year which was interesting since it was that supervisor, did you try to want to be popular?
Although that re-broadcast could not but be pain for itself.

2005/02/21 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by 三面 Provider: 7364 Host:7132 Browser: 4184
The third (movie 含む) unnatural work.
What was seen directly was only the scene of a synchronization of the last round.
It does not do by no means this year, either.

2005/02/21 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by Emuputeii Provider: 9462 Host:9759 Browser: 4925
Even if compared with 1, not to mention a movie, in all, it is inferior.
the women's lib whose something does not change so much with a story 1 and is almost meaningless -- し it made it the みたいな high school Is it the composition which something saw by somewhere?
人ぞ知る "to know -- break -- it is は男 -- " -- I want to see It comes out and surrounding men are opposed to a synchronization public performance like 1 after all.
the reason of although the deputy schoolmaster of 1 is meaningful perfectly and being opposed, since it is merely barbarous here -- と -- しか -- it was not felt Performance of the members of a hero is also severe.
It said or several persons have already covered by kyara setup.
the last buchidebu -- so much -- performance -- although it was not nice, since a kyara setup was good, kyara stood And the heroine ...
Although he does not plan to say Satomi Ishihara bad, the Suzuki えみ is lost perfectly.
It attached, and the difference has passed, and did not see and shine just for a moment.
Later ....
The bad first place.
There is no gay bar why!?
The supporting player is not standing at all.
Compare with last time.
Touch which photogravure told too whether performance 8 て was also such a thing also for performance of the Inoue 和香.
Although it is a question in what it is the Inoue 和香 individually ....

Post your review / Top page
ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.
Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.



Please give your evaluation or comment.

You need two other people's comment to post your comment again after you post your evaluation or comment.

Your Name(Required)
Password (Required. more than 4 characters)
Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.
Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.


Top page of DB | Site map | Copyright(c) 1999- 1st Class All rights reserved