Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Drama ranking: Rank 941/in 993 titles (Total -11.04/Deviation 43.90) Rank 940 <= => Rank 942
Drama ranking of 2007: Rank 65/in 76 titles Rank 64 <= => Rank 66

Yama-onna Kabe-onna(Drama)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

Other media
Comics:Yama Onna Kane Onna

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Goods
(DVD)

Latest Music: 2007/09/25 ():

Soundtrack $99

DVD(1hit) Sales/Latest	Music(1hit) Sales/Latest
Rank:140355 2007 Japanese Tv Series: Yama Onna Kabe Onna (Mountain Woman, Wall Woman)	Rank:991224 Audio CD:Soundtrack Tag:$99 2007/09/25 ()

Information about this title

Evening Koudansha
Suzuki Osamu
Ishida Katsunori
Exile
Misaki Ito
Kyoko Fukada
Oikawamitsuhiro
Hiroki Kawata Garezzisell
Eiko Koike
Eriko Miura

[Detail]

Misa Uehara
Shin Yazawa
Youichi Nukumizu
Go Wakabayashi
Shosuke Tanihara
Hidetoshi Nishijima

Released:2007/07/05 in Japan End:2007/09/20 in Japan

Official sites
1. http://wwwz.fujitv.co.jp/yamakabe/index.html (Translation)

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	DramaRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Bad(-1.38)	941	43.90	-11.04

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	3,950	8	8
Outside Japan	145	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

12.5%

0.0%

25.0%

0.0%

12.5%

50.0%

Added percentage

12.5%

37.5%

50%

100%

Summary

12.5%

25.0%

62.5%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 30
6 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

Other media
Comics:Yama Onna Kane Onna

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/07/25 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by 鯖鯖 Provider: 6184 Host:6356 Browser: 6342
An original is non-読.
They are the comment as a TV drama purely.
Two starring Although it was people famous for a brilliant Japanese radish For the rash act of Fuji Television of leaving this, although amazed, the surroundings are also my kaワ of garejji.
Shin Yazawa.
Eiko Koike (<- although it fits in depending on a role foundations so much).
It was the literary exhibition which arranged the famous cast as hardening が脇.
Mitchie and Tanihara Probably, warm water was serious.
It will suspect without reason.
although it is the title which emphasized the breast, there is no depth as contents -- after all -- jealousy by the difference of character -- not visible -- once -- Hero who not viewing and listening to the last evaluates even if it feels it as a severe work, and does not become precocious and who says and comes together from two or more males Work Trouble to love etc.
、 currently drawn by the comical touch Faltering performance of starring The last also chooses proper 男選び and a workshop and it is て.
Isn't there any piece of 欠 of unexpected nature, either?
Evaluation is "very bad." Disagreeable ぁ The point which can be evaluated is not found.

2007/10/24 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by Metako Provider: 39923 Host:39892 Browser: 3874
since depiction of a breast is caricatured like original comics -- so much -- being disagreeable -- was there nothing?
Kyouko Fukada's まりえ suits her own ほんわ or the atmosphere carried out, waits, and thinks that inside 々 was good.
On the contrary, Aoyagi of the Ito 美咲 was not slightly quite satisfactory.
I think whether it was the greatest fault of this drama.
by original comics, two persons coexist and are mutual -- although it is alike, and kyara is stood and being suited, since the drama version runs by being completely drawn with the Aoyagi viewpoint, it seemed in it to it that only the strange pathetic feeling stood previously Since the supporting player's inside 々 was good, he had a slightly wasteful feeling.
I think [ that it was better whether for the Ito 美咲 to do まりえ in fact and ] -- so that he may also say.
re-broadcast -- among those, it will carry out -- honest [ けど and ] -- we do not not much recommend you In the Ito 美咲 fan, it is especially.
We recommend you the direction which says OK only by seeing Kyouko Fukada.

2007/10/07 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by Meteo Provider: 20251 Host:20474 Browser: 5234
The comical position of 深 kyon thinks that it was good.
Although the place which emphasizes 巨乳 was quite unpleasant, it was good to have made it overall noisily.
He was able to be enjoyed.
I do to on the whole being common.

2007/10/02 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by CRQ Provider: 18183 Host:18109 Browser: 3875
Although seen once, it has stopped seeing in several minutes.
When some troubles occurred, immediately, it spoke and the word "breast" was pulled honestly.
For me, he had a feeling which has insulted the female breast.
Is it a feeling disagreeable as the same woman?
although it, Mr.
Ito, and Mr.
Fukada hear the opinion of the lower part in performance -- me -- which -- と -- if it says, Mr.
Ito's direction will think that performance is severe If compared with けど which is also in Mr.
Fukada well so much, but does not become precocious, and Mr.
Ito, I will think that it is mashi.
Evaluation will presuppose that it is the worst.

2007/09/23 Best! [Original Japanese review]
by Bakaboke Provider: 27679 Host:27551 Browser: 7783(Mobile)
Since it became the last round just recently, it is evaluation.
Since the first time was seen by chance well, as it was looking, it fitted in rapidly.
The cast thinks first that it was good.
(Since there is no original view て, it does not understand deeply) Mr.
Aoyagi whom Mr.
Ito who is a hero plays thinks that hamate いて was very much good.
The role of marie which Mr.
back Fukada is playing is not bad, either.
Is that he liked in back individual my Kawa of the role of Matsubara?
Can it be laughed at words when I am deep to senior だっつ - and marie?
Even if it makes it the talk, I think that it was the tale which remains in an impression in each time.
however, the place which made the size of a breast the title as it was -- well with the pros and cons Evaluation was a hama った drama in the highest after a long time.

2007/09/14 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Sharu Provider: 1407 Host:1250 Browser: 5598
Although the cast is gorgeous, doesn't it seldom care for it, considering a title?
Although it thinks that a "mountain" and a "wall" carry out the simile of the size of a female breast, it is unpleasant at the time.
The story is also seen [ whether he is plan to aim at sex appeal depiction and ] with the subject ばっ loan of a breast as expected, and has displeasure.
Only by on the whole being merely noisy, it is not interesting at all.
Consideration of a televiewer, especially a female televiewer regards this work as having not become at all.
Those who worry about the size of a breast should also have ...
[ many ] Since there was no scene which thinks is good with the ばっ loan which is looking and has displeasure, evaluation is made into the "worst."

2007/09/05 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by 樹梨葉 Provider: 32756 Host:32741 Browser: 2864(Mobile)
it is what -- be fastidious -- ?
woman is not baka(ed) -- ?
sexual harassment-work Although it is not comics 読ん and may be able to read as a comedy and gag if it is まぁ comics, probably, there is no on-the-spot photo.
First of all, it is common sense to hit in public the thing ?
sexual harassment a certain male character is not foolish that says to a woman with large Holstein and breast.
I want you to stop the scene where a fiction also gives only displeasure how much.
A displeasure drama without って and follow.

2007/08/13 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Kaname Provider: 16636 Host:16720 Browser: 4184
I will say clearly.
If it says honestly, there is no drama which felt displeasure so far.
The contents of the talk and all the themes are a "breast." It is not in this drama in the pillar of a tale etc.
with the language loan of a breast for every 事ある.
Although once seen by curiosity, し [ it retired from like start 20 minute ].
けど which it will lose if I say, and may be 犬っぽく聞こえる -- Only a woman's sizes of a breast are not all.
It is the sexual harassment utterance of a kind [ size / of a breast / say / how or ].
Since feeling will become bad if it says more, it carries out so far and solves.
Needless to say, evaluation is the "worst." Each drama of Fuji Television of this term is useless.
--

Post your review / Top page

Other media
Comics:Yama Onna Kane Onna

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.