Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews 		Others
Site map
Search / Outside DB:
Drama ranking: Rank 826/in 972 titles (Total -2.00/Deviation 47.36) Rank 825 <= => Rank 827
Drama ranking of 2005: Rank 43/in 60 titles Rank 42 <= => Rank 44

Brotherbeat(Drama)


[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)		ForumImages
Information about this title

Eriko Komatsu
Misako Tanaka Tetsuji Tamayama Mocomichi Hayami Akiyoshi Nakao
Reina Asami Mayuko Iwasa Akio Kaneda
Hiro Mizushima Minami Otomo Mayako Takeuchi Kazusa Matsuda Aya Okamoto TOMOHARU HASEGAWA
Kenichi Yajima Kyoko Kamimura Hidekazu Akai
Takuzo Kadono

Released:2005/10/13 in Japan End:2005/12/22 in Japan
Official sites
1. http://www.tbs.co.jp/brotherbeat/ (Translation)
Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)
 AverageDramaRankDeviation(Total)Evaluation points(Total)Best of the Best
Inside JapanGood(-0.50)82647.36-2.00 

Statics of activity

Total ViewsCommentEvaluation
Inside Japan3,55964
Outside Japan29800

How others evaluated in Japan

BestVery GoodGoodNormalBadVery BadWorst
People0010300
Percentage0.0%0.0%25.0%0.0%75.0%0.0%0.0%
Added percentage0%0%25%25%100%100%100%
Summary25%0%75%
                                                                                                    

Views for recent 8 days
Total432131302928
6
1
0
0
0
2
0
2
1

LanguageSorted by dateSorted by recommendation
EnglishGood
(Only Evaluation)		Normal
(Only Evaluation)		Bad
(Only Evaluation)		All
(Only Evaluation)		None
JapaneseGood
(Only Evaluation)		Normal
(Only Evaluation)		 Bad
(Only Evaluation)		All
(Only Evaluation)		None
This reputation board

Post your review / Top page
The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.
2007/09/23 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Sharu Provider: 1407 Host:1252 Browser: 5598
Although it is touch that the flow of the whole imaichi work does not remain in an impression, I think that it is the work which was able to be enjoyed.
While quarreling frequently and having various problems, I think that a family's bonds were felt.
Was it impressive that whose scene of a quarrel was real ...
However, he had a feeling that the theme nature of the whole work could not remain in imaichi 掴めず and an impression easily.
Although it is the work which was able to be enjoyed ...
Although it is a little thin in an impression, since it is the work which was able to be enjoyed, evaluation is made "good."
2007/09/22 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by CRQ Provider: 18183 Host:18109 Browser: 3875
[Good point] I thought whether to have been the sequel of a second chance at first.
Although it was Mr.
Tanaka's serial drama performance of for the first time in [ five years ], the mother who shows and gives the field where it also became brave that it is lazy kyara to perform usually if compelled was good acting.
A family's strong bonds were also seen.
[a bad point] -- it is having pulled the story too much -- it is Only that is a subtracting point.
[Comprehensive evaluation] Although this drama was not every week, it was sometimes seen.
Comprehensive evaluation is bad.
2007/04/16 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by Mamaringo Provider: 27679 Host:27547 Browser: 7782(Mobile)
They were honesty and below expectation.
& quot; Can a family's beat be heard?
" it was not audible although it was a ていう copy.
When sukatt which has a battle more like the scene which flowed at spot, and the fresh manlike drama are expected, they are marriage of the eldest son, rehabilitation [ of the second son ] ?, and impression TV drama depicting family life of departure of the love of the third son and youth.
It was the form where words also pursued a time, and it has been spoiled whenever it follows a time.
Unnaturalness was not able to be denied to the environment of somethings and the sons who change suddenly together so that it may assail in [ mere ] several months.
as for one person grade, change could have -- if -- ?
spring -- the blessing -- being remarried -- it solves -- having ば良ed .
It is the touch to say.
2005/12/17 Comment(good) [Original Japanese review]
by 詩遠 叶 Provider: 694 Host:655 Browser: 6287
I am allowed to enjoy myself each time.
Has it grown into a child (?) with everybody fairly good for there being no father?
it is also the second son -- inheriting blown で家 だり ...
the eldest son has also got married -- carrying out ...
is the third son uneasy?
It consists of good child past てこれ what...
Does it become bright if this family is seen?
8s ぱ and family って are good -- it is looking, thinking - It evaluates, after seeing future deployment, since he likes the third son individually.
2005/12/17 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by Matsu Provider: 10891 Host:10782 Browser: 3846
It just called it the modern version "a second chance." (ikemen 3 brother) -- Or [ that one person is different ] -- Although all are seen once, it does not seem to be not much interesting.
2005/11/18 Comment(good) [Original Japanese review]
by Kajimasan Provider: 8286 Host:8381 Browser: 6213
It began to see from three talks.
It is still hard to judge and is a comment.
Is it the drama of the fuss system which the mother idle somewhere who brought up three man brothers who grew up by the so-called fatherless family, and them weaves?
The exquisite debt by the blessing makes this and a work interesting in spring when the eldest son (smile) who thought that the roles of a mother were Ms.
Misako Tanaka and a beauty fairly mother is clear in each character of characters -- lightness and the third son of a reliable person and the second son are somewhat gentle -- and moreover a mother.
Does calling the thing of a blessing "Mr.
spring", "me", and "you" in spring also have interesting sons?
rather than it calls it parent and child -- a friend -- it is visible to a みたいな relation Such frank atmosphere is very good well.
....
It carries out in しっ, and when only that is mother complex moreover in ikemen, three sons are not pleasant as a mother every day, or (smile) are the dramas to which expectation is applied most in now.
Post your review / Top page
ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.
Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Please give your evaluation or comment.

You need two other people's comment to post your comment again after you post your evaluation or comment.

Your Name(Required)
Password (Required. more than 4 characters)
Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.
Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.

Top page of DB | Site map | Copyright(c) 1999- 1st Class All rights reserved