Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map

AllAnimeGameComicNovelDramaSp. effectJP movieMovie	Info:voice,game..	Reviewers	Diary
Search / Outside DB:

Drama ranking: Rank 922/in 946 titles (Total -25.06/Deviation 38.59) Rank 921 <= => Rank 923
Drama average points ranking: Rank 160/in 174 titles (Average -1.79(Very bad)/Deviation 33.58) Rank 159 <= => Rank 161 (more than 10 evaluatoin)
Drama ranking of 2006: Rank 73/in 76 titles Rank 72 <= => Rank 74

Gatibaka(Drama)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Information about this title

TBS
Kijimaseiichiro
Mai Kuraki
AAA
Katsunori Takahashi Waka Inoue Ikki Sawamura
Yuya Tegoshi Takahisa Mazuda Tomoka Kurokawa

Released:2006/01/19 in Japan End:2006/03/23 in Japan

Official sites
1. http://www.tbs.co.jp/gachi-baka/ (Translation)

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	DramaRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Very bad(-1.79)	922	38.59	-25.06

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	5,285	16	14
Outside Japan	273	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

0.0%

7.1%

57.1%

21.4%

Added percentage

7.1%

14.2%

21.3%

78.4%

100%

Summary

7.1%

85.6%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12
2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation New!
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation New!
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/05/16 Comment(normal) [Original Japanese review]
by Mikkokko Provider: 42947 Host:42868 Browser: 6342

[Good point]
The hallelujah of AAA of an opening theme is the highest!
It is heard, and it is valuable, is and is !.
Words and kanari are good.

[Bad point]
They are janiizu and あ which has much such の.
.
.

[Comprehensive evaluation]
It is not common well.
かなあ.
.
.

2008/02/09 Comment(normal) [Original Japanese review]
by 富永龍太郎 Provider: 12868 Host:12578 Browser: 3875
[Good point] It is my Yaguchi 聖来 too.
[Bad point] They are a vegetable and the Takabe あい in the summer of Watanabe.
[Comprehensive evaluation] With so so や

2007/09/21 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Bakaboke Provider: 27679 Host:27547 Browser: 7783(Mobile)
He saw by about [ which Mr.
after Takahashi calls starring by the school thing ], although this drama was from the middle.
it is said well that a former boxer's hero becomes a teacher and the contents are concerned with students -- it was common when saying that it was common well But wasn't he worried too?
students -- my -- it was able to be concerned -- it carried out and, as it is, the game of the last boxing was able to be enjoyed evaluation is good -- coming out -- 。

2007/09/18 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by CRQ Provider: 18183 Host:18109 Browser: 3875
[a good point] -- the thing free whose Mr.
Takahashi's enthusiastic performance was good -- it is only it [Bad point] It was the result useless as a school drama.
It was common, and there is no twist and it carried out by not being interesting.
Since it was a school drama, I wanted freshness.
Charm was not felt only by about the child who is likely to be anywhere also as for the role of a student.
[Comprehensive evaluation] Did you try to want for this drama to have a bad audience rating?
If a twist is in a scenario to a slight degree, it may be that the audience rating was also extended.
It goes into the minimum classification in the drama to which it has viewed and listened until now.
Comprehensive evaluation will presuppose that it is naturally the worst.

2007/08/01 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Kaname Provider: 16264 Host:16373 Browser: 4184
It turns out by from 1 that it is pakuri of "GTO" "is not carried out very much" this drama and at the moment of seeing.
って and everyone needs to notice and be fastidious.
To the extent that it cannot be -- That it was cold deployment from the first time also remembers well.
It is impressed by the teacher who knocks with crying.
-- Common deployment in which even a twist is not impressed.
Did you carry out BGM mist kiln and cut?
Having retired at once cannot be overemphasized.
the school drama of TBS -- "golden 8 teacher series" -- beginning -- good impressions, such as "a teacher of gakko", and a "dragon cherry tree", -- continuing -- I have you -- pakuri running fire of this drama was that too severe し [ I felt that the theme song was also seldom in a work ].
Evaluation is the "worst", without wavering.

2006/10/17 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by 武信君 Provider: 4716 Host:4626 Browser: 4928
Although it is a faint memory, it is remembered that it was a work without what surpassed especially.
a defect and confrontation -> reconciliation -> -- defect another again and confrontation -> 和解 -- whether they were such contents well and ...
in the impact like Tadano 仁や Kintaro Yajima, the hero of top 作, not having been felt, as for Tetsuhiro Gondo who is the hero of the work of Takahashi Mr.
演じるこ although Mr.
Katsunori Takashima of starring was performing the drama of famous comics originals, such as "special mission chief Hitoshi Tadano" and "salaried worker golden Taro", carried out and has finished with the "sultry teacher" grade -- or [ cause of defeat ] ......
For the thing also with so novel the characters which harden the side, just, it is fatal and it is sushi that it was absent ...
this work itself [ most ] -- for the fan of Mr.
honest Takahashi probably because there was also no subject nature -- black -- I think that it was a historical work

2006/09/02 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by 魔人具 Provider: 42463 Host:42300 Browser: 5234
Compilation of a certain meaning "a school drama" -- Kana.
Although there was the school drama so that it was counted until now and did not go out, I also regard not remaining in an impression this much as new.
honest -- things, such as individuality and originality, are completely nothing only about the scene seen in that drama of having seen in this drama is it intelligible if it says that "GTO" was thinned to about 5 times?
again -- the leading role and eye 脇役含 -- it was the drama which calls it this, and noted 演 is not seen, either and is completely truly unpromising Evaluation is "very bad." "TBS of a drama" is where it went --

2006/04/16 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by 優梨 Provider: 13661 Host:13806 Browser: 6287
Although I like a school drama and it is checking me briefly, this is ...
too much.
The talk "it could come and was also that drama" from one talk, and on parade [ of deployment ].
Although whether an original is in "gachibaka" does not know, I think that I twisted one to a slight degree, and wanted you to carry out.
Moreover, nothing was felt for the students who have appeared in this drama although it was important in the school drama whether a student has charm.
Every child thought that he had not employed efficiently well only by having set mainly by the reason of "since it being janiizu" "since it is popularity now."

2006/03/24 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by Mukkii Provider: 14954 Host:15037 Browser: 3874
Or [ saying what ] -- It is just Class B dorama って touch.
It is GTO with bad quality.
Even if a performer can also still allow janiizu, such as 手越祐也 and Takahisa etc.
Masuda, the Inoue 和香 is with the thing of how it is.
-- Does it fight for the lowest grade in the drama of a period of treatment whether TBS has forgotten failure of water boys, and now [ ?
]?

2006/03/16 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by 稟 Provider: 3057 Host:2926 Browser: 4184
It is boring only at deployment of the similar talk.
Common talk [ say / looking after a student, while the teacher of poor former one takes charge of a problem class and is opposed to other teachers ].
There is no freshness.
Since the tale of a school thing becomes common, I want it to devise to a slight degree from the first.
If a royal road story is developed as it is, I will think that an eye is not applied any longer, either.

2006/03/09 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by Patapata Provider: 3432 Host:3504 Browser: 5237
Respect is expressed to the courage which dared have sent out such a hot blood teacher drama to the present time.
It does not know whether it should be called an inspiring feat or it should be called a foolish attempt.
problem 起こ will be carried out and it will become kubi, immediately after there is actually such a teacher -- けど and there -- the opportunism of a drama -- it is -- what -- it does not become kubi even if taken to ど警察署 -- oh, wonderful (Smile) well -- serious -- view ちゃ -- it is a useless drama, or if it pulls 1 step and sees, as it is, he may be able to be enjoyed No, it is although it thinks that it sees seriously and there are some persons who can be impressed.
however, if it is called something, the Koshien participation will carry out ~ って excitement -- now -- becoming -- ?
-- a piece -- the incident of size Tomakomai feels that a complaint is likely to appear only in a timely hit just for a moment

2006/02/10 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by TCC Provider: 42212 Host:42137 Browser: 4184
It is what to have carried out this, although TBS should have established reputation in school drama work, such as kinpachi (although this is not such a favorite work, either), and the dragon cherry tree was also Ryosaku.
Am I simply boring to thin-く and to look by the structure which was conscious of GTO?
a certain woman student who cannot say easily that yesterday's talk also dated with a classmate's boy student the second half as a beauty to the compliment disclosed by the classmate -- it -- striking -- going out -- the outside of a classroom -- coming out -- the end -- although it was the deployment whose boy student of にゃそ confesses anew love "likes [!!!
] it although there is no reason" -- invigoration -- there was nothing .
Did you want to say also by "there is no reason in love!!"?
Although it was the borrowing ばっ kana which was seen by everybody somewhere and there was also no persuasive power .............
My hippo [ why or ] had come out of the middle with the role of a barber again?
Mr.
gori whom the star who left the excellent piece of music "the woman of the Scorpion" etc.
to Kenichi Mikawa Mr.
みたい also has and who announced the unsightly disguise-as-a-woman figure in red and white although it does not carry out and prejudice was not necessarily in okama -- such "himselves can be seen objective together -- having -- ね- [!!!
] -- " -- does the human being of a kind give only a bad impression?
although CM of a certain deodorization agent on which he is appearing is also seen several times -- immediately -- a channel -- 変え .
Although there are not necessarily highlights, such as performance in which Mr.
Katsunori Takashima's age which is 42 years old of an unlucky year is not given, the evaluation which "is very bad" on my standard is suitable.
Although a school drama was not necessarily expected from the first ............

2006/02/05 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by Naooki Provider: 26281 Host:26126 Browser: 4928
although there is nothing without main ん, you say (although looked once every week) -- as -- GTO -- very -- not carrying out (since gold 8 not having having seen, although it not being known) -- it does not divide strangely [ contents ] -- since it cut, it did regretfully a main player is sorry about me, because I also think that まぁまぁ is good -- やな

2006/02/04 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by 3854 Provider: 1592 Host:1399 Browser: 4317
All the friends that looked at this drama to which I want you to attach more the difference from the old thing doing is beta, was peevish and such a tale was tired of seeing [ thing ] have said the same thing.

2006/01/20 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by Hina Provider: 12661 Host:12505 Browser: 2864(Mobile)
If it is GTO, is peevish and is called -- まぁ charm as brilliant, although it is good that salaried worker golden Taro cannot be performance of Mr.
Takahashi of 馴染, either, and uses the music of back Hawaiian6 -- Isn't it?

2006/01/20 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by Matsu Provider: 6110 Host:5917 Browser: 3846
The royal road of a TBS version GTO?
school drama -- Pattern There is no twist in a story.
-- Future deployment will also be able to be read.
事ある which each looked at by somewhere -- a spectacle [ like ] -- it does not carry out very much -- GTO, gold 8, yanboko, and ets ...
it has 飽きed bored truly BGM is also noisy.
-- Unpleasant.
Although the player in whom sound appears and who does not hear words in this way is good, he is regretful.

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.