Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews
Others
Site map

Search / Outside DB:

Drama ranking: Rank 270/in 993 titles (Total 5.00/Deviation 50.02) Rank 269 <= => Rank 271
Drama ranking of 1993: Rank 10/in 26 titles Rank 9 <= => Rank 11

HOMURATATU(Drama)


[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)
ForumImages
Information about this title

Katsuhiko takahashi
TAKEHIRO NAKAJIMA
Minori Terada
Ken Watanabe Yuko Kotegawa
Hiroaki Murakami
Kotaro satomi
Takehiro Murata Taro Kawano Toshihide Wakamatsu
Tohdoh Shinji
Taro Ishida
Tatsuro Nadaka

Etsushi Toyokawa
Nagare Hagiwara
Keizo Kanie
Michifumi Yoneyama
Kei Sato
Kouichi Sato
Tsunehiko Watase
Kouichi Miura Eisuke Tsunoda
Ryuzo Hayashi
Kazuo Ando
Ko Nishimura
Hironobu Nomura Miyuki Matsuda
Akira Nakao
Saburo Tokito
Kyozo Nagatsuka
Kojiro Hongo
Sinya Ono
Hiroshi Yagyu
Released:1993/07/04 in Japan End:1994/03/13 in Japan
Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)
 AverageDramaRankDeviation(Total)Evaluation points(Total)Best of the Best
Inside JapanGood(1.25)27050.025.00 

Statics of activity

Total ViewsCommentEvaluation
Inside Japan3,24744
Outside Japan30000

How others evaluated in Japan

BestVery GoodGoodNormalBadVery BadWorst
People0130000
Percentage0.0%25.0%75.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Added percentage0%25%100%100%100%100%100%
Summary100%0%0%
                                                                                                    

Views for recent 8 days
Total1110987654
8
0
1
2
2
2
0
0
1

LanguageSorted by dateSorted by recommendation
EnglishGood
(Only Evaluation)
Normal
(Only Evaluation)
Bad
(Only Evaluation)
All
(Only Evaluation)
None
JapaneseGood
(Only Evaluation)
Normal
(Only Evaluation)
Bad
(Only Evaluation)
All
(Only Evaluation)
All
This reputation board


Post your review / Top page
The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2007/03/03 Good [Original Japanese review]
by au-ri Provider: 13841 Host:13712 Browser: 5234
Was it unpopular although it was a masterpiece to the extent that it fights for 1 and 2 in a TV saga in me?
Since it is dark well.
し [ it is the talk of a family who has perished as a result in it ].
But that thinks that it is good.
Surely, a winner and a loser are in war or a political strife.
However, that by which what won then was absolutely right and was beaten is whether it is wrong sure enough --.
I declare "no." "Justice wins" is the pattern of the tale of 伽噺 or a fancy to the last (since the fancy thing is not independently necessarily denied please.).
Since neither a fancy thing nor poetic justice is disagreeable translations, in such realities (historical fact), that is not necessarily right.
There is a portion which it may be proud of even if it wins, and there is a shameful victory and it is beaten.
Genji who lapsed into the internal trouble state as a result, and ruined himself although it became a winner and the partner was ruined when saying with this work -- being ruined -- Mr.
Fujiwara who 齎(ed) various good inheritances by wonderful intellect and refinement さ although carried out I want to pay Mr.
loser (drawn by carrying out) and Oshu Fujiwara instead of a winner and Genji respect.
them -- being beaten -- although carried out, since the shameful thing has never accomplished "A winner is not necessarily right." It is the masterpiece which drew this theme firmly from the beginning to the last.
such works -- do you want to view and listen more?

2006/07/20 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Katoru Provider: 7289 Host:7325 Browser: 5234
even if it forsakes the wife and children of appearance and the part II hero at the part I hero's death -- the family -- tenacity-of-purpose -- part III which is going to achieve revival -- the Oshu 関係あらへんやんけ Anyhow, although other big rivers and the difference are conspicuous, I will be hard to receive the strangely real dark talk at mealtime.
The right and wrong of a scenario are set aside and super-低視聴率 can be agreed.
If it says so, don't join 経清, a mother-in-law, and Mr.
sister-in-law 見捨てて Abe.
Although a part of 源頼義 demonstrates the cruel nature of the Genji speciality last, in the historical fact, the whole family in whom it was comparable cruelty and, as for the Kiyohara family of this drama じゃ villain's part, the Go-sannen no Eki-related picture scroll also remained is following the way the end where Yoshiie is also more miserable than the Abe whole family.
-- Although there is no forgiveness in the Genji って敵, if 敵い becomes that there is nothing, don't fight for the whole family soon.
although well known before and after Yoritomo, its Yoshiie 3 brother is also mutual -- since it fought, steps and influence become weak Although there will also be each convenience at the time of そん, it is almost itselves, and it is extermination やんけ.
all war -- such a thing and 言っちゃ -- although it is to it, last no less than nine years, and Gosannen also consider, and it is an I game only in っ -- [ (-_-) ]
2005/10/15 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by 向井大輔 Provider: 47481 Host:47532 Browser: 4184
How for it to be visible if a viewpoint is changed is different for what this just says as history.
Don't forget existence of the man who pulls the blood of Ezo with unique culture in this drama with Yamato whose Mr.
Fujiwara was in Mutsu although drawn mainly.
The way [ as ] of drawing which was dyeing it the color even by Mr.
Fujiwara who came from Emperor once with the culture of them, them, is adopted.
And Genji who comes by Zen-kunen no Eki at least says clearly, and is the treatment of an aggressor.
Cortez who persecuted the Native American, and Pissarro -- it needs true -- Mr.
Abe -- ら -- I want to have come to aid Shortly, although Mr.
Abe lost in last nine years, although Mr.
Kiyohara comes into power, an understanding is not reached with Emperor again but it is attacked in Gosannen.
After all, Mutsu becomes Mr.
Fujiwara's thing after Gosannen.
But too, with Emperor, compromise is bad and they are also ruined the back.
It can be said that the culture which compromise with Emperor's human beings does not suit has rooted in the place too referred to as thinking like this with Mutsu some or other considerably.
Therefore, it is thought that aterui was taken out.
it needs -- probably, I want to say that the origin of は彼ら is Ezo With the ordinary history textbook written to まぁ to the extent that it all cannot tell, it is touched and world deployment is carried out [ there is nothing and ].
It is an alarm bell to the man of today who bolts the history which the winner made like "the storm of Ryukyu." But seemingly, it was a low audience rating.
Although man will always use what means and I will make others trouble, it is with ってこ which yearns after [ what only carried out even the victory ].
it -- this -- it will be because it does so, and blood is once pulled although won Since it is natural that that in which it lost is killed.

Post your review / Top page
ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.
Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.



Please give your evaluation or comment.

You need two other people's comment to post your comment again after you post your evaluation or comment.

Your Name(Required)
Password (Required. more than 4 characters)
Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.
Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.


Top page of DB | Site map | Copyright(c) 1999- 1st Class All rights reserved