Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Drama ranking: Rank 572/in 968 titles (Total 1.00/Deviation 48.51) Rank 571 <= => Rank 573
Drama ranking of 2002: Rank 23/in 39 titles Rank 22 <= => Rank 24

Renaihensachidaisanshokanojyonokirainakanojyo(Drama)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Information about this title

Yuji Sakamoto
Shiro Sagisu
Misia
Naomi Zaizen
Kou Shibasaki
Takashi Kashiwabara
Ken Kaito
Akiko Kiuchi
Miki Yahagi
Toshirou Yanagiba

Released:2002/08/29 in Japan End:2002/09/19 in Japan

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	DramaRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Good(0.50)	572	48.51	1.00

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	1,232	2	2
Outside Japan	83	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

0.0%

50.0%

0.0%

Added percentage

50%

100%

Summary

50%

50.0%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21
5 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation New!
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation New!
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/08/06 Good [Original Japanese review]
by 鯖鯖 Provider: 13602 Host:13844 Browser: 6342
The "love standard score" and a name are struck.
While carrying out the love drama which is completely different two or more times It was the drama of a wonderful form which packed three works.
Are common.
The bar whose each is favour is the same.
Is it a supporting actor like a chairman?
[ "つんく which is a master" ] まぁ The amateur theater of this "つんく" are conspicuous.
It is supreme and is as a story.
Eye these three talks remains in the impression most.
"Zaizen -- in addition -- seeing -- " and "柴咲 kou" Two persons from whom the position in a company, character, and age are too different Fall to a certain man-of-ability elite simultaneously at love, and get into depth (it is a severe man, in order that one person may play, it may come out and one person may steal trade secrets).
He understood and having suited was interesting.
Origin of "Zaizen" naa which does not have a 演技って pattern in acting as the actor from "柳葉" って昔 although it becomes clear by thought people's "柳葉"'s help.
Evaluation is "good." Although it is the interesting drama which a continuation worries in a normal, is it thoughtless probably because there is no number of 8s ぱ times?
It was the appearance which is ladies comics.

2007/11/08 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by TCC Provider: 30800 Host:30573 Browser: 4184
Was it the drama series of a new form which divided one period of treatment into three parts?
Although it is the last chapter that the additional proposal of the inner me was made ...........
[A good point] - Main cast Did Mr.
柴咲 kou's good acting shine?
In addition, although each work with which she appears, such as "orange deizu" and a "battle royal", was only a work which remained in the impression strongly, was performance power a No.1 also in the youngman?
I regard the activity which eats Ms.
Naomi Zaizen also by this halfway as having been carried out.
- Tempo says.
Since it was all 4 talk conclusion form, was it unrelated in it being redundant?
- Theme song Although it seems that MISIA is also cut and the vigor of a degree did not have it recently, the volume of voice which sounds in the heart demonstrated singing ability fully also by 本作.
[A bad point] - A beta story But although there were also some good points, the talk itself was monotonous generally.
In if the man with a sufficient parenthesis who was a bar by chance was headhunted to the company in which he is working deployment (a favorite dish is seasoned beef with potatoes.
the time of the first contact -- "--) which was seen in other dramas " -- ebara -- CM -- と -- I want to have come to thrust in -- carrying out, "age is 23 years old だろ with" mist beam "unreasonableness I want to have come to thrust in with " 面白み was seldom felt.
[Comprehensive evaluation] Because there was also a point with Mr.
柴咲 kou's sufficient good acting etc., was it the work which was able to be regarded as there being no undue importance somehow?
Although there was not necessarily such an unpleasant point ............
Although there was no memory which encountered the level more than Ryosaku in the drama of FUJI though it was overly subjective recently, this was also the drama of a little delicate style.
Evaluation is "common" in good a [point] and [bad point] offset.

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.