Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Game ranking: Rank 1,981/in 3,468 titles (Total 2.00/Deviation 47.84) Rank 1,980 <= => Rank 1,982
Game ranking of 2007: Rank 68/in 136 titles Rank 67 <= => Rank 69

Final Fantasy Tactics A2 Fuketsu no Grimore(Game):Simulation

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Information about this title

SQUARE ENIX
Nintendo DS

Released:2007/10/25 in Japan

Official sites
1. FINAL FANTASY TACTICS A2 (Translation)

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	GameRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Good(1.00)	1,981	47.84	2.00

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	2,523	2	2
Outside Japan	85	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

0.0%

50.0%

0.0%

50.0%

0.0%

Added percentage

50%

100%

Summary

50%

50.0%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5
5 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 1

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/03/07 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by Shimaarashi Provider: 18003 Host:17823 Browser: 4823
Having deteriorated compared with FFT was not able to be denied.

[Job system]
There is neither a kind nor a job which and is too strong, and balance was maintained.
However, the pleasure raised since an enemy is past [ weakness ] was also reduced by half.

[Story]
In order to entertain a job system, it was thin touch in touch which was made forcibly.
Although the job system became good, since the story became less good at all, high evaluation is not attached.
Therefore, evaluation is common.

2007/11/11 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by Akanechan Provider: 18003 Host:17885 Browser: 4641
It is the same as that of a previous work, and is not the same.
Is this the comment of 今作?
- The man who gets used to shiifu by abolition of "arms are stolen" and "stealing ability" which suited (2) previous work that whose the treatment of a good place (1) Qwest item changes, and it is afflicted by the limit of the number of the maximum possession which was one of the troubles of a previous work it was lost, It can receive, even if (5)AP with which a previous work is no longer bound by the low by the relief of (4) low to which it became impossible for an enemy and an ally to use powerful ability for each other from the beginning does not participate in Qwest unlike (3) previous work whose predominancy of mooguri was lost, since MP at the time of an engagement start is 0.
Furthermore, since it could dispatch also to Qwest of a battle system, it came to be able to perform strengthening of the member who is hard to take out to new subscription and engagement (however, unless an experience value participates in Qwest like a previous work, it cannot come to hand).
- The imaichi trust of the cause or the rate of (2) hit with tempo bad a little to which the worrisome point (1) production became colorful cannot be carried out (it separates also from the level of 90% comparatively).
although the evaluation regarded as it being the result which is not bad although the FFT system is not giving me so much is sweeter, it is very good -- it is alike and carries out

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.