Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Game ranking: Rank 3,057/in 3,417 titles (Total -2.00/Deviation 46.81) Rank 3,056 <= => Rank 3,058
Game ranking of 2003: Rank 72/in 84 titles Rank 71 <= => Rank 73

Gambler densetu tetuya bainin chouzyou kessen(Game)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Information about this title

Koudansha Weekly Boys Magazine
Playstation 2

Released:2003/07/03 in Japan

Official sites
1. http://www.athena-game.co.jp/tetuya2/index.html (Translation)

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	GameRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Very bad(-2.00)	3,057	46.81	-2.00

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	565	1	1
Outside Japan	29	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

0.0%

100.0%

0.0%

Added percentage

100%

100%

Summary

100%

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation New!
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation New!
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2007/02/07 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by F山 Provider: 6238 Host:6376 Browser: 6287
We cannot recommend you the purchase of this.
Completeness is lower than 1 all fields.
To the extent that it thinks whether to be a sequel with it being true.
Dante, a pair, does just as he likes except not going up from Tetsuya, and Tetsuya's professional work is carrying out large degeneration of it being impossible to use only one etc.
in respect of the system.
Next, it is clearly amusing although it is difficulty.
木座神 of the first game is past [ strength ] unusually.
They are Jinbo of the fort of the Ueno big-four last, and the difficulty like this level.
If even 木座神 is pushed down, the enemy who can push down without suffering troubles so much for the time being will continue.
If it becomes in the end, difficulty will go up sharply again.
the field of beating a formidable enemy well -- fashion -- it is -- I think whether to be Although a system is imaichi and becomes empty.
I think that the animation which flows in a story had improved.
It was able to enjoy only there.
However, since it is a trash as a mah-jongg game, unless it is also a fan, there will be no value to incur.

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.