Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews 		Others
Site map
Search / Outside DB:
Game ranking: Rank 3,212/in 3,421 titles (Total -3.00/Deviation 46.56) Rank 3,211 <= => Rank 3,213
Game ranking of 1990: Rank 91/in 97 titles Rank 90 <= => Rank 92

Minasan No Okagesamadesu(Game)


[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]
All
Reviews(Post)		ForumImages
Information about this title

Arcade NEOGEO

Released:1990 in Japan
Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)
 AverageGameRankDeviation(Total)Evaluation points(Total)Best of the Best
Inside JapanBad(-1.50)3,21246.56-3.00 

Statics of activity

Total ViewsCommentEvaluation
Inside Japan38222
Outside Japan8500

How others evaluated in Japan

BestVery GoodGoodNormalBadVery BadWorst
People0001001
Percentage0.0%0.0%0.0%50.0%0.0%0.0%50.0%
Added percentage0%0%0%50%50%50%100%
Summary0%50.0%50%
                                                                                                    

Views for recent 8 days
Total6543213130
5
0
0
0
2
2
0
1
0

LanguageSorted by dateSorted by recommendation
EnglishGood
(Only Evaluation)		Normal
(Only Evaluation)		Bad
(Only Evaluation)		All
(Only Evaluation)		None
JapaneseGood
(Only Evaluation)		Normal
(Only Evaluation)		 Bad
(Only Evaluation)		All
(Only Evaluation)		None
This reputation board

Post your review / Top page
The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.
2008/03/16 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by 前田清貴 Provider: 21589 Host:21342 Browser: 3876
It is that there was also evaluation of こ and such a game -- Since the mah-jongg game of an excessive arcade is the direction which is not devoted, although I do not do 連 coin so much -- Did you think that it was a very individual mah-jongg game those days -- Since there is memory whose top of the place of the last goal was cruel, do you think that it will repent if devoted too -- Evaluation -- Although not necessarily carried out so much, in consideration of the point which was able to be enjoyed so so, it is made a "normal."
2008/03/13 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by 消しゴム Provider: 14576 Host:14557 Browser: 6520
Striking mah-jongg, the top on a sugoroku-like map is advanced and the goal is aimed at.
This is required with this work.
if a rule wins a game, a top moves forward, and if it loses, from retreat and a start point, it will be a rule referred to as stopping at whether it falls back and the place written to be "game over" with game over, and be involved in movement of a top in the top where a functional side is unkind -- た麻雀 worsened game advance extremely Since neta related to るず was not so interesting only from impact, either, after playing in とん announced within the game, it repented of the person similar to Rie Miyazawa putting on 褌, and making the same pose as "Santa Fe" etc.
violently.
Post your review / Top page
ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.
Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Please give your evaluation or comment.

You need two other people's comment to post your comment again after you post your evaluation or comment.

Your Name(Required)
Password (Required. more than 4 characters)
Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.
Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.

Top page of DB | Site map | Copyright(c) 1999- 1st Class All rights reserved