Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews 		Others
Site map
Search / Outside DB:
Game ranking: Rank 2,274/in 3,405 titles (Total 1.00/Deviation 47.58) Rank 2,273 <= => Rank 2,275
Game ranking of 2000: Rank 59/in 76 titles Rank 58 <= => Rank 60

Orega Kantoku Da(Game)


[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)		ForumImages
Information about this title

ENIX SQUARE ENIX
Playstation 2

Released:2000/11/22 in Japan
Official sites
1. http://www.famitsu.com/game/daily/2000/m09/d01/sw02.html (Translation)
Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)
 AverageGameRankDeviation(Total)Evaluation points(Total)Best of the Best
Inside JapanGood(1.00)2,27447.581.00 

Statics of activity

Total ViewsCommentEvaluation
Inside Japan84411
Outside Japan8000

How others evaluated in Japan

BestVery GoodGoodNormalBadVery BadWorst
People0010000
Percentage0.0%0.0%100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Added percentage0%0%100%100%100%100%100%
Summary100%0%0%
                                                                                                    

Views for recent 8 days
Total2019181716151413
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0

LanguageSorted by dateSorted by recommendation New!
EnglishGood
(Only Evaluation)		Normal
(Only Evaluation)		Bad
(Only Evaluation)		All
(Only Evaluation)		None
JapaneseGood
(Only Evaluation)		Normal
(Only Evaluation)		 Bad
(Only Evaluation)		All
(Only Evaluation)		None
This reputation board

Post your review / Top page
The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.
2006/11/25 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Miruguru Provider: 7542 Host:7578 Browser: 6287
The game in which he becomes the supervisor of a team and aims at the pennant race championship.
It could play for dozens of years and a draft, a new foreigner, FA, and a trade and flexibility were high.
However, action of an enemy team is quite a problem.
The injury [ which does not change a batting lineup ] which does not carry out the trade between computers probably, which does not take a new foreigner, which does not consider team composition but is confusedly reinforced with a draft is not carried out.
Thus, was there any omission considerably?
Since it will be in the runaway state of a self-team if it will do for about three years, it is easy to 飽き bored.
Moreover, weren't graphics so good, either?
A face and form were not alike and the motion was also kakukaku.
The tempo of a game was merely good.
Even if set to 2, was the above-mentioned point seldom improved but was also the tempo of a game bad?
I hear that the point and flexibility which can merely make their team were high, and he was able to be enjoyed fully.
Evaluation is "good."
Post your review / Top page
ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.
Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Please give your evaluation or comment.

You need two other people's comment to post your comment again after you post your evaluation or comment.

Your Name(Required)
Password (Required. more than 4 characters)
Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.
Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.

Top page of DB | Site map | Copyright(c) 1999- 1st Class All rights reserved