Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Game ranking: Rank 1,772/in 3,459 titles (Total 2.00/Deviation 47.85) Rank 1,771 <= => Rank 1,773
Game ranking of 2001: Rank 42/in 78 titles Rank 41 <= => Rank 43

Ruriiro No Yuki(Game):Adventure

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Information about this title

AIL
Princess Soft
Playstation

Released:2001/04/26 in Japan

Official sites
1. http://www.oaks-soft.co.jp/princess-soft/tonari/index.html (Translation)

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	GameRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Very good(2.00)	1,772	47.85	2.00

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	925	2	1
Outside Japan	233	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

0.0%

100.0%

0.0%

Added percentage

100%

100%

Summary

100%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 30
2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2006/02/11 Comment(good) [Original Japanese review]
by 634 Provider: 19705 Host:19451 Browser: 5234
since kyara has been sharply renewed compared with "the azure snow" of the prototype personal computer version and Sega Saturn, if the person who did the previous work plays the home version of 本作 "snow of truth and azure" -- "-- whom -- I think that there were probably many people who tilted this man" and head Had not the leading role's 瑠璃 and the semi- heroine's (?)'s proton grade stopped the prototype?
Large renewal of the other kyara is carried out.
It has been changed into the form of [ even a hero's doctor is dearer than a previous work, and ] a beauty boy (a reverse pattern called a beauty boy when glasses are moreover removed).
hair becomes a bob cut, as for 雪菜, Kaori covers glasses (omaaju(when it goes by contact, without covering glasses, got interested by Mr.
Kaori.) ?
of a previous work), and 綾霞 and Miya are not like 瑠璃 and a proton -- be alike and carry out -- the prototype is maintained barely However, are there many people whom the 園村 sister and the blessing regarded as "瑠璃雪 of a previous work is where 行った?" although the prototype was lost and it became intelligible [ the difference between Futaba and verdure ] the previous work [ it ]?
り in which the reverse side (?) heroine is absorbed also appears, and it came to come out to the front, and by the previous work, the supporting player member whom the character also had in the previous work newly reset up such cut characters, and has measured renewal.
Similarly such examples have a game called "Wordsworth", "el", a "love sister", "恋姫", etc.
of 創る erufu in 18 禁 games of a personal computer in the masterpiece group of RPG not only including 本作 but "dorakue" and "FF." Although erufu and airu were erogee makers, even if erufu renewed the "classmate" who is a signboard game, the kyara design of contents was still Masaki Takei (a "lower grade student" is Aya Kadoi).
For the reason, bold renewal is not performed.
However, airu has renewed sharply the snow of the azure which is a signboard-game.
Although, as for this, the pros and cons were divided, it was an original picture house's having trouble with a company, and changed into the condition of あらあ and others.
It did not go to the reason for putting in home use, therefore 18 禁 scenes like a personal computer, and the sexy cut eased a little like Sega Saturn was not put in, either.
from those who know the previous work, and those who are not so -- "-- what it obtained and has considered - む" -- imagination -- hard -- or time could be placed to a slight degree -- if -- I also think ?
although possibly-izing was able to be carried out [ 緩和 ] like Sega Saturn when becoming PS2 -- the object for the candidates of low age -- と -- did it take out also with the condition to say by PS?
Although it focused on the part story and supporting player kyara and the story and the character were heaped up rather than the previous work, it is hard to say that game nature had a device, and, probably, you may say that the pros and cons are divided.
If H scene is cut at any rate, I will take out such supporting player kyara to the front more, and will think that the changed part of heaping up a story could be given.

2005/01/16 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by 斐川竜斗 Provider: 40026 Host:39878 Browser: 3875
It is the serious review without gag this time.
The portion of gag should look at January Juso days of my diary, and 14 days.
Although the scenario of this game is wonderful, it has two points which must be taken into consideration at the time of evaluation.
since the dirty scene is cut by force -- the scenario of a part of kyara -- the scenario of a part of kyara -- a part -- flying -- a る scene -- it is -- in addition -- and the thing for which volume has been downed since there is no CG of the portion Tempo is a bad thing that it is hard to use a killing-time system.
18 -- the maker's indifference was felt for there [ I wanted you to melt there ] where the part addition CG into which the 禁な scene was cut, and a text are put in But I think that it is the good result to the extent that the maker's indifference is blown away.
It laughed from the bottom of a belly or was impressed.
An unprecedented portion is also acceptable by the favor made into the feeling of the world which exists anything beforehand.
A scenario thinks that all the members are good except verdure.
In a 瑠璃 scenario, there where the earnest whole surface of the doctor who is baka usually, and who is doing the 事ばっ loan can be seen is smart.
A 瑠璃 scenario has only the main heroine and is a hit.
The sadness which she carried on the back is transmitted.
as good kana ?
as the same is said of Futaba -- she also has sadness in the meaning different from 瑠璃 Do you think that Futaba does not have a dirty scene and is a correct answer?
I am disagreeable if there is such a scene on the contrary.
The person who had be interesting since it was the interesting work with charm to the extent that it is carried out somehow or other into which various elements were put even if there was a dissatisfied point is a trial.

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.