Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Game ranking: Rank 1,310/in 3,417 titles (Total 3.01/Deviation 48.10) Rank 1,309 <= => Rank 1,311
Game ranking of 2007: Rank 36/in 129 titles Rank 35 <= => Rank 37

SUPER PAPER MARIO(Game)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Goods
(VideoGames)

Latest VideoGames: 2007/04/10 ():

Super Paper Mario $99

VideoGames(4hit) Sales/Latest				Books(4hit) Sales/Latest				Toys(43hit) Sales/Latest
Rank:142 Video Game:Super Paper Mario Tag:$99 2007/04/10 () Eval.:***** 1.Mario's english, not so good	Rank:425 Video Game:Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door Tag:$99 2006/06/15 () Eval.:***** 1.Loved It!	Rank:20490 Video Game:Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door (Original Black Label) Not Players Choice or Best Sell... Eval.:***** 1.A rare RPG gem in a sea of mundane.	Rank:29425 Video Game:CODEBREAKER D.J. FOR PLAYSTATION 2 AND PLAYSTATION Tag:$99	Rank:202565 Paperback:Official Nintendo Super Paper Mario Player's Guide Tag:$99 2007/04/02 () Eval.:***** 1.Simple and effective guide.	Rank:411356 Paperback:Super Paper Mario: Prima Official Game Guide (Prima Official Game Guides) (Prima Official ... Tag:$99 2007/04/10 () Eval.:***** 1.Third-Party Paper	Rank:1138925 Paperback:How to Win at Super Mario Bros. Games Tag:$50 1994/12 () Eval.:***** 1.Very Very Helpful	Rank:1860669 Paperback:Super Paper Mario: The Official Player's Guide 2007/09/14 ()	Rank:32852 Toy:Super Mario Soft Mascot !" Figure Keychain Tag:$99	Rank:48178 Toy:6" Super Mario Bros. Yoshi Island Edition Yoshi Plush Doll (One Random Color)

Information about this title

Nintendo Co.,Ltd.
Wii

Released:2007/04/19 in Japan

Sites about how to play the game
1. http://www3.atwiki.jp/aaa333/

Official sites
1. http://www.nintendo.co.jp/wii/r8pj/story/index.html (Translation)
2. http://wii.com/jp/articles/spmario/ (Translation)

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	GameRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Good(0.43)	1,310	48.10	3.01

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	8,227	8	7
Outside Japan	43	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

14.3%

28.6%

14.3%

0.0%

14.3%

Added percentage

14.3%

42.9%

57.2%

71.5%

85.8%

100%

Summary

57.2%

14.3%

28.6%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22
1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation New!
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation New!
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/06/05 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by MaLink Provider: 24416 Host:24703 Browser: 8090
Is it a work on the theme of "love" this time?
It is good that there is moreover no sense of incongruity by the story with gag with serious.
Mr.
L is the highest!
Favorite!
It is already a great fan!
....
It is quite regrettable that was merely slightly weak ...
It was disagreeable that only the last neighborhood could operate important ruiiji ...
Instead, it is quite easy to use and is advanced comfortably.
A story is also very much good and the last was moved to tears ...
.....
After がっ and the clearance was severe.
That the character which has disappeared on a story revives violates the rules!
Impression of the play for the 2nd week is halved.
I will revive at any rate, and will say, do and consider.
It did and whenever [ lump ] got tired of being honest low.
It is using [ only Mario ]-dimension ワza mist.
Changing one by one is troublesome.
However, since a story and deployment were rather good, they are "and good ".

2008/05/03 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by dfdf Provider: 46099 Host:46094 Browser: 6287
once -- dimension ワza -- although it is and has done also as action of a normal -- kyaragee It understands, if it is only in one Mario RPG of festival software.
such software is piled up and Mario is misunderstood -- is there nothing じゃ?
Alike [ the view of the world ] kana although it did not do [ a mario story or ], since the development place is the same ...

2008/02/24 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Kafuerate Provider: 3975 Host:4015 Browser: 2982
The
[total play time]
It cleared once at grade for 30 hours.

[Good point]
2D and 3D are changed always and a れる system is good.
Shooting shot with Teresa of a mini game is pleasant.

[Bad point]
Many one is regrettable, although it changes 2D and 3D, and it will kill, if it cannot go unless it changes, although れる is good.

[Comprehensive evaluation]
Although it was the first paper mario, the story was able to be enjoyed very much well.

2008/01/01 Comment(normal) [Original Japanese review]
by 微妙 Provider: 38880 Host:38973 Browser: 8090
The [total play time] 11 hours [Good point] The majiiru system whose music of a battle of Earl the last [ noワーru ] was good was good in why.
[a bad point] -- not as long as satisfaction of the story was carried out -- coming out -- peevish - [Comprehensive evaluation] Is it for beginners?

2007/11/16 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by Zerugesuto Provider: 49605 Host:49733 Browser: 2454
Although once called Mario's RPG sequel, I think that it is completely a different thing.
Graphics also became a heterogeneous thing in Pella Pella, and it cannot have a quite satisfactory favorable impression by design whose ally kyara is also childlike.
Although they were cage kyara, maro of Mario RPG of SFC and Gino were smart, and since they were korabo of Nintendo and Square, they were good.
[ most ] Difficulty was also low, and it did, and 今作 responded and did not have が.

2007/11/05 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by COOL Provider: 54698 Host:54741 Browser: 3876
It seemed to be air completely.
It will be a misapprehension game, if only the idea which 本作 succeeds only the old naming sense and old graphics of an item of the Mario RPG series, and is called plane conversion was made epoch-making to the old Mario RPG series having been the work which has the volume which spends 30 - 40 hours in play time and it says.
Difficulty is tepid and it is also facts words and to have been hard to read with the hiragana or katakana notation, to have played from the beginning, and to have not thought at all that it was interesting.
Although it becomes in the second half and has come to feel a response at last, if it carries out from the player which has still got used to the contents of the latest large-boned mario series, it is unsatisfactory, and if it compares with the old Mario RPG series, it is called only a leading trash and there is no business.
It is because the type with which a feeling of achievement is transmitted carried out game じゃなくって and it waited with the technology of a player.
Probably this game is quite for children.
It does not osusume to those who have been satisfied with the old Mario RPG series.

2007/07/30 Best! [Original Japanese review]
by 鉄銀 Provider: 28954 Host:28906 Browser: 6287
The [total play time] Kana which was three days.
[Good point] There was an impression scene.
It is that ruiiji also appeared.
On the whole, the idea was good and is the game which blows away old tiredness.
It cares about it having been no longer RPG, and it does not become precocious.
し [ it was pleasant ] ...
[a bad point] -- after [ ending ] Anna & -- noワーru does not appear at all A lever becomes that what or caught fuearin does not have less henceforth [ 6-4 ] as for a jasmine No.
2.
[Comprehensive evaluation] It is not nothing less than highest !.

2007/07/15 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by 潜伏好き Provider: 11560 Host:11778 Browser: 6287
The [total play time] About 14 hours.
The clearance has not been carried out yet.
Middle.
[Good point] A story and the atmosphere of kyara are good.
It is interesting to progress making full use of the capability of dimension work or a fairy.
[Bad point] Although it wrote that it was interesting to progress in the upper one, making full use of the capability of dimension work or a fairy, if it says bad, since it is always necessary to carry out a kyara change, we cannot recommend you those who desire an action game with tempo.
[Comprehensive evaluation] The first direction had the good touch which becomes more difficult and more difficult, although it was easy.
If it is earnest and does, it is clearable without difficulty.
I think that it waits, experiencing atmosphere leisurely or is suitable for playing.
Evaluation is "very good."

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.