Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Game ranking: Rank 3,250/in 3,459 titles (Total -3.00/Deviation 46.56) Rank 3,249 <= => Rank 3,251
Game ranking of 2007: Rank 126/in 135 titles Rank 125 <= => Rank 127

Shikaku Kentei DS(Game):Study

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Information about this title

SEGA Nintendo DS

Released:2007/07/26 in Japan

Official sites
1. http://www.nintendo.co.jp/ds/software/a2jj/index.html (Translation)

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	GameRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Worst(-3.00)	3,250	46.56	-3.00

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	246	1	1
Outside Japan	22	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

0.0%

100.0%

Added percentage

100%

Summary

100%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 30
4 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/06/28 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by HUNGRY SPIDER Review history[Good:1(25%) Normal:1(25%) Bad:2(50%)] / Provider: 5473 Host:5173 Browser: 7395
Although it is the work of an announcement called the study game which can enjoy various certifying examinations freely in quiz form -- It warns [ be / allowed to た / I ] without exaggeration.
It is absolutely more useful to hit others, if the bad thing did the study game, since it did not say.
This work has 50 or more qualification in stock, and the number of inclusion problems exceeds 5000 subjects in it.
Although it can say that there are not few vocabularies hidden in the work from this number, in the case of a study game, "how it is made to attach to the body happily" becomes a problem of the utmost importance about the miscellaneous information.
Considering the viewpoint, this work cannot but say as a game that many fatal defects (it is not a "fault") are by 孕ん.
Hereafter, the defect is written out concretely.
- Description absence Not a little special knowledge is required [ in / every field / in saying / ち資格試験 with sufficient だ ] /.
That is, the category of general education is exceeded in many cases.
Daily, you could understand it, if the information which hardly meets is the direction by which the jostling problem sentence of a certifying examination had been read.
Although it is the work "an understanding" which carried out the ax 事しっ loan is needed, and what can be referred to as indispensable for the reason "grasps [ read description and ] meaning of a title" in order to make such information into its "culture", this work has made "description" of such the main point fly off fully.
By this, the play of this work has stopped at "the work which only merely carries out stick memorization of a problem and the answer." Now, the purpose of learning culture in a game etc.
should not be attained.
The information on stick memorization is "information" どまり after all, and is because it is not the "knowledge" which can be used as its thing.
Or [ that what the percent is accompanied by understanding of a meaning although he also remembers some problems of this work ] -- A hopeless value will be calculated.
this work mistakes the meaning of "culture" and "study" -- しか -- I cannot consider There are never no they at circle memorization of mere information.
The needs are not filled with there being no description although it thinks that there is much direction which gains this work by thought of wanting to deepen the culture other than oneself.
- The defect of play environment Although it is insipid to do the study game whatever the appearance itself, important one dramatizes the insipid work how, or in the case of -- hakkiri 言って and this work, it is a problem precedent to it.
The environment of this game will be "nastiness" if expressed with a word.
whether when a maximum exists in the number of times of taking an examination of the "certifying examination" which must be the main of this work generally (others -- you have to gain an admission ticket to an examination in the mode), the staff has mind of it being earnest and making a player studying qualification, and 勘潜ってしまう Although not restricted to a study game, it is foundations to make it make progress in process in which a game self-conscious about visiting is memorized repeatedly.
The same thing can say also to study and it is a fellow called the real thrill on account of the degree of high difficulty.
However, this work does not allow the "process." In order to obtain a "admission ticket to an examination" required in order to take a certifying examination, you have to clear the conditions of "a culture examination" set at random from a miscellaneous inclusion problem.
Now, time and effort is taken purely, and above all, if a culture examination is random form at all and it is considered in the context called the preparation for qualification to challenge, it must be thought that it carries out a surprising detour.
Although form like quiz of disqualification is taken if a problem is set by 12 questions as for this "certifying examination" and three questions are mistaken, this conflicts with hakkiri 言って and the a problem setting-form of a written examination.
Even if a portion is not made in the first half, it is a certain ワke also in a possibility of reversing in a portion in the second half, and since there is it, a test can hold hope of not understanding to the last, and a feeling of strain.
Therefore, undoubtedly the system of this work has ground a hope peculiar to an examination, and a feeling of strain to the 木端 piece.
An examination is not quiz.
Moreover, although the "review mode" which enables indispensable "review" exists in study, it is a thing with a random a problem setting-form like [ this ] "a culture examination." That is, a genre to review cannot be specified by the side here.
Since there is no description in it as above-mentioned, review of this work is carried out to "the repetition of memorization of a mere problem" from beginning to end.
Since culture is deepened, it cannot be called the review for qualification acquisition at all.
Since it is too irrational for study of qualification, I cannot regard at all the needs of the direction taken in its hand for such the purpose as this work filling, either.
- Carelessness of a game setup Unbelievably, there is no mode what and "a game setup" in this work.
That is, in the side here, interference is impossible at all to play environment.
If there is no complaint in まぁ and the setup itself, although it was good, this work still has a problem in a troublesome thing very much also at a setup.
In the case of, high-handed narration was unpleasant anyhow.
The time of especially carrying out a wrong answer "inaccurate solution!
Take out such a special problem that there are also no means to know suddenly [ " / call -- ], say since it mistook, and beat.
"Doesn't the player carry out nerve irritation!?
Although felt only as ", since a setup is the impossible, as long as there is nothing, you have to hear a call by silence.
Because BGM is not bad, I think eagerly whether this became somehow.
By the way, it is although there is a system which can check a play situation also in this work.
-- Since various ranking is rests, though it is independently good, "charm evaluation" is greatly dissatisfied.
Although it thinks that there may be the consultation system itself, since the comment high-handed for itself in the case of this work is waiting, even if it raises a rank, it does not separate pleasantly, and there is [ the standard of consultation careless-reaches to an extreme above all, and ] nothing.
[ who was conferred ] Although this goes up with the number of correct answer problems, if there are some which are hard to be referred to as suitable and it becomes an inaccurate solution in "review mode" above all, a rank will fall by the rate of a correct answer being completely unrelated.
This is not what thing more than 削ぐ about the volition of review, either.
It was the thing with which, as for this work, dissatisfaction greatly remains even in a basic setup also including the badness of the production over which tasteless dryness passes, and operativity.
It cannot but let the whole pass and it must be said that this work was carrying out very irresponsible structure.
study personally without depending on such の, if "所詮 wants to take a game and qualification from a setup by contents unkind to where" -- でも -- saying -- た -- the thing had to be felt Do you regard the study game as what?
Or [ there is such this work and really what use ] -- Although it is inadequate, furthermore is not what was simply able to be used for the study of qualification at all even if it makes it quiz, and it carries out to substantial culture, usage of holding "saワri" of まぁ and a qualification certification examination roughly may be able to be done.
と、 -- if it becomes -- this work -- "the trial version" -- enough -- と -- although it will say -- though regrettable, he cannot deny this It is better for a study game to hit others, since the really bad thing was not said, although repeated.
Because there is the study effect and an interesting study game exists.
From the above reason and comment, evaluation to its this work is taken [ be / allowed to た / I ] as the "worst."

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.