Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Game ranking: Rank 1,370/in 3,459 titles (Total 3.00/Deviation 48.10) Rank 1,369 <= => Rank 1,371
Game ranking of 1980: Rank 5/in 13 titles Rank 4 <= => Rank 6

Baroonbomber(Game)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Information about this title

Taito Corporation
Arcade Playstation 2

Released:1980 in Japan

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	GameRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Very good(1.50)	1,370	48.10	3.00

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	547	2	2
Outside Japan	74	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

50.0%

0.0%

50.0%

0.0%

Added percentage

50%

100%

Summary

50%

50.0%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 30
3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/02/25 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by TCC Provider: 10414 Host:10694 Browser: 4184
this is also fairly old -- a game -- as -- naturally -- that -- although it was soft and being played ........

[The total play time]
Is it about several hours?
Although he does not remember hakkiri ........

[A good point]
- Music Although possibly it was able to say that it was a little common that tempo became early itself as the number of 風船 decreased [ carrying out slowly at first ], was a kind of feeling of tension felt?

[A bad point]
Although it was not difficult for the attack itself to avoid although it was impressive first to have used that masterpiece space invader as the base as for the important game itself, since a scaffold decreasing rapidly and falling to it which was broken down also made the mistake when it did not attack, before carrying out it, was it felt quite severely and ill-tempered?
I think that several steps were more difficult than honesty former neta.

[Comprehensive evaluation]
Probably, it was one article of the game out of which is done and the difference of the crowded person and those who are not so comes.
Although the game of a number of works which made this space invader ...........
etc.
at the base although it was latter one, of course appeared, I should call it simple izubesuto too, or the direction of former neta is playing me, and I think to a normal that I was interesting.
Is evaluation a "normal" well?

2007/02/10 Best! [Original Japanese review]
by 消しゴム Provider: 5297 Host:5022 Browser: 4925
It is the work which can also be called direct descent of a "space invader." It is the purpose to shoot down four bombs which move to right and left, operating 砲台, being attached in 風船 and shaking like a pendulum.
If all 風船 are shot down, it not only starts over again, but the height of 風船 will become low gradually.
Although the attack of the ship of the selling point style of this work maximum may also be referred to as being in order to delete the scaffold of 砲台 in addition to the obsceneness which the "space invader" increasing [ offensive trouble's ] originally has and it is easy to avoid the attack itself Since a scaffold is deleted and movement becomes impossible gradually, it is a work suitable for shooting down, before being attacked calling it the developed type of a "space invader" with which the obsceneness original with a work demanded is conspicuous.

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.