Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Game ranking: Rank 1,986/in 3,415 titles (Total 2.00/Deviation 47.84) Rank 1,985 <= => Rank 1,987
Game ranking of 1991: Rank 50/in 114 titles Rank 49 <= => Rank 51

Sdgundum4(Game):Simulation

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Information about this title

YUTAKA
Nintendo Entertainment System

Released:1991/12/21 in Japan

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	GameRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Good(1.00)	1,986	47.84	2.00

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	712	2	2
Outside Japan	52	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

0.0%

100.0%

0.0%

Added percentage

100%

100%

Summary

100%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21
1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation New!
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation New!
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2007/02/24 Good [Original Japanese review]
by 捲追911 Provider: 6972 Host:6862 Browser: 5234
Since the campaign mode on which that it has played still more pleasantly than a previous work although it was the touch which succeeded the form of a previous work systematically and there was nothing by the type of liking [ individual especially the system of this form ] not necessarily clears the scenario to reverse shaa from the first was individually interesting, I think that it was at the an advantage than the previous work.
Incidentally, usual scenarios other than campaign mode carry out size of an one-person play and the waging-war play, and there are pleasantly.
[ no ] However, the high level of the offensive strength when going into the dogfight of hakkiri 言う, a battleship, and MA like balance of the strength of a unit is unusual.
when initiative was taken by a battleship or MA by the dogfight, there was almost many death on the spot -- even if it carries out and says what -- a mulberry -- the kana (smile) in which the game it is not new that fatty tuna is shot down by Basque with one blow probably does not have at least this game じゃ It and that one more liked individually had quite impressive BGM, and he liked really the music at the time of ZZ scenario and a reverse shaa scenario also in it.
Evaluation is "good."

2007/02/01 Good [Original Japanese review]
by 634 Provider: 11756 Host:12069 Browser: 5234
Although an attack did not hit and stress collected the attack by whether it is 喰らってばっ anyhow at the previous work, the fault of such previous works is improved and 本作 is quite user-friendly.
Even "F-91" is added to the appearance work having been to "shaa of a counterattack" in the previous work here.
Furthermore, new feature of map arms called the colony laser used also for next series was also added.
It was easy to play rather than a previous work, and since it was improved, it was like [ to which a question mark is attached, saying, "what was really the badness / a previous work / of balance?" ].
It can agree with such improvement systems and there are that to which an original fan is satisfied, and an impression which is bringing the view of the world close more rather than that of a previous work.
The portion made to regard it as fan service being prudent from the previous work was also remarkable bean paste.
The admiration which specified the directivity to next series also has the height of the completeness of 本作.
The portion as which the action battle of "scramble uoozu" form is seldom no longer adopted also carried out touch which the height of the completeness of 本作 is proving.
Although the new type attack and the indirect attack were also powerful and were considerably found useful when the level went up, the combination of a genre called such fun and cancer dams of SLG can be referred to as being the work of skillful-くこ-less た最初.
It is indispensable series when knowing the history of a cancer dam game.

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.