Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Game ranking: Rank 2,959/in 3,405 titles (Total -1.00/Deviation 47.07) Rank 2,958 <= => Rank 2,960
Game ranking of 1982: Rank 14/in 14 titles Rank 13 <=

Wildwestan(Game):Shooting

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Information about this title

Taito Corporation
Arcade Playstation 2

Released:1982 in Japan

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	GameRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Good(-0.50)	2,959	47.07	-1.00

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	443	2	2
Outside Japan	46	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

0.0%

50.0%

0.0%

Added percentage

50%

100%

Summary

50.0%

50%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13
2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation New!
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation New!
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/03/02 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by 634 Provider: 10414 Host:10516 Browser: 6342
Although it is an early work comparatively in shooting action of TAITO, a chiipu impression cannot be denied only to an old game truly in contents.
Although a sheriff's hero fights a handgun and favorite horse as a burglar or a rascal partner in the western part at arms When the train which should be protected is obstructive anyhow and a cartridge hits a train, there is unreasonable [ of rebounding ] and above all Even if it cannot change to skillful く〓e〓here compared with an enemy, will crash into a train and it will die, if the enemy who rode on the train being bad if it does not change to a train here, however changing goes wrong, and it beats the enemy on skillful く〓e〓It became the thing ...
which cannot beat the enemy who rides and pursues on a horse this time.
Although it will be the kana which beats an enemy how rather than changing to a train before approaching a train if it says which it is since it is such condition, compared with an enemy, it is overwhelmingly disadvantageous here, the hit judging of a cartridge is small, it is difficult to attach skillful く狙い, and an enemy has the recollections which did not hit easily in the cartridge here.
In the meaning, when seen on the present level, it was the game which also carries out touch which does not escape kusogee evaluation, either.
Although it is the game played for the first time by the TAITO memoriizu, the badness and chiipu さ of the game balance cannot say not at all.
although not much good touch feels somehow a feeling of the fatigue [ carry out and ] somehow ...
which was not carried out even if it makes it the eye catch after a stage clearance, if it is an old game, a clear-cut solution is given to it but probably, this game and the present young user do not have uke -- having the feeling ......, in such meanings, this work is a work without the place praised by completeness or game nature not much in the game of memorandum riizu Since memorandum riizu put the game variously into ちゃ混ぜ too much well, although the point ...
has balance adjustment.

2008/02/28 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by TCC Provider: 28203 Host:28141 Browser: 4184
Although it seems that this work recorded on the TAITO memoriizu was sold to the year in which the Chunichi Dragons did the league championship ........

[The total play time]
Kana which was about several hours well.

[A good point]
- BGM It may be heard from everyone at once.
Although the famous music considered was also adopted, I want to have come to hum involuntarily.
Was laver good?
- Bonus game Probably, as it is, the score obtained was attractive, when it succeeded.
The thing that it is also glad to be piled as it is even if it fails.

[A bad point]
- An important game.
however, when the attack on an enemy seldom applies this editing first but the eye was taken [ they ] only in about, it is alike and was irritated operationally anyhow the rock, the cactus, the hitting pigeon, and often since it is an old game, although it may be a thing also with such not much wrong also requiring -- invigoration -- とは -- there was nothing
[Comprehensive evaluation]
Although I also comment most games to the work of TAITO recently, are the TAITO memoriizu series on which the work of-izing こ is recorded the bottom so, especially it of the 80s jumble of wheat and tares?
Though it was regrettable, possibly it was able to be said that this was the direction of not a ball but a stone when saying which it was, even if it took the thing of a time of those days etc.
into consideration.
Well, evaluation is the "normal" of the slippage which "is bad" at large 甘.

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.