Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map

AllAnimeGameComicNovelDramaSp. effectJP movieMovie	Info:voice,game..	Reviewers	Diary
Search / Outside DB:

Japan movie ranking: Rank 820/in 866 titles (Total -7.98/Deviation 42.45) Rank 819 <= => Rank 821
Japan movie ranking of 2000: Rank 22/in 23 titles Rank 21 <= => Rank 23

Keizoku movie Beautiful Dreamer(Japan movie)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Information about this title

Yukihiko Tsutsumi Yumie Nishiogi
Miki Nakatani Atsuro Watabe Sarina Suzuki Raita Ryu Yu Tokui Katsuhisa Namase
Koyuki Hairi Katagiri Tomorrow Taguchi
Tadaasami Anna Nagata Nanako Ohkouchi Hideyo Amamoto

Released:2000/03/04 in Japan

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	Japan movieRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Bad(-1.33)	820	42.45	-7.98

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	2,077	6	6
Outside Japan	127	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

0.0%

16.7%

0.0%

50.0%

0.0%

33.3%

Added percentage

16.7%

66.7%

66.7%

100%

Summary

16.7%

83.3%

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation New!
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation New!
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/07/03 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by KOKONO Provider: 34710 Host:34550 Browser: 2982(Mobile)
They are the drama version and destruction.
It already restricts to this.
Shibata which was shot by Saotome and Saotome who were shot by Mayama and must have died and must have died.
Does the special version of a drama carry out that the friends considered to have died similarly otherwise are likely to revive and it is likely to deify?
Though natural, the image of the drama version which was the serious last is broken completely.
It is not a story like making it revive, either.
Although reviving is delightful to be sure, is it fan privilege image みたい of having carried out now [ 作っちゃ ] since it was only popular?
A meaning did not understand the last of the movie version by favor.
Touch that that self-satisfaction was all shown to the supervisor also carried out the incident in the first island also for subsequent deployment, although it came to this site and I understand, supervisors are the same people as a "trick" and the incident bore a strong resemblance to a thing like a trick.
it -- it is -- overall -- the occult -- touch [ tic ] was not able to be denied individual -- "keizoku" -- the occult -- I think tic Or [ that the work which broke the original this much also meets so / which is not ] ....
Originality is also missing, and it is as it merely lengthens intently.
Was the novel of the drama version reproduced faithfully too and an original better?
Evaluation is the "worst." It is better not to see the direction which the drama version and a novel like.

2008/04/22 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Bakaboke Provider: 29382 Host:29389 Browser: 7783(Mobile)
Since the drama was seen, are they the contents to the extent that it can follow somehow?
from a drama -- a few -- about moon Nikkei った -- from -- although the talk starts, although the contents of an incident are memorized and it does not become precocious, a dyspeptic mystery remains well -- a seed Whom was あさくら after all?
Although he wanted to know this of No.
1, a movie is sufficient, it was not explained and an understanding was not completed.
However, the exchanges of Shibata and Mayama are the contents at which it can laugh too, and tedium was not carried out.
in consideration of the point, evaluation is good -- coming out -- 。

2007/09/24 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by どうか Kappa と発音してください。 Provider: 4926 Host:4780 Browser: 4184
If TV series is not seen anyhow, it is the work which a meaning does not understand at all.
Since it is a story mysterious on the whole even if it is seeing TV series, it is still more troublesome.
Naturally the movie of such an individual character is also living, and it is inserted as the so-called gag in mystery deployment of the second half that it is extreme.
And it will be completely left by the admiration person from whom thing narration becomes the deployment which is taken to a different dimension as if it ran recklessly rapidly.
It is completely brandished by Director Tsutsumi's idea.
and Shibata -- it will be exchanged well, being pure (Miki Nakatani) and expectation whether progress is looked at by the relation of the Mayama 徹 (Atsurou Watabe) being also It comes out and slips down by the punch line after all.
It is the work in which an indigestion is impressed various.

2006/10/24 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by SHUNIA Provider: 12151 Host:11928 Browser: 5540
* Change into 07/02 / 20 "very bad" ->-> "the worst." netabare -- it is a あり some Since there were "special editing" and the "movie" which are impressed in a drama by good deployment and serve as the continuation, it sees.
However, it has decided to have repented very much that it was better not to see now, and "for the sequel to have not existed" as me.
It is the bad work made so very much.
"Special editing" and the "movie version" are evaluated by the set.
------------------------------------------------ [a good point] ------------------------------------------------ All [ not both works ].
They are the last contents which would be rather done even by making a screen version.
------------------------------------------------ [a bad point] ------------------------------------------------ ................
<< -- story >>:E ................
Contents which broke impression to that serial drama "keizoku." Is also the original author good for honto now?
I feel that it is not "keizoku" any longer for "keizoku" etc.
which the conclusion of connection with Asakura attached.
(Individually "Mayama" Although he may only like ...) .
I cannot only think that he wants "Shibata" and "Mayama" to only play an active part.
-- [ -- + / -- Special editing / -- + / -- + / -- + -- ] + -- + By special editing, a capital college graduate's newcomer career "golden Taro" tends to appear, and it is going to show excelling an east college graduate's hero "Jun Shibata." By damage in the incident of a previous work, Shibata had lost memory.
The murder case by "the tree of the curse which makes a contract of death" which is in a certain shrine exactly occurs such inside.
Taro Kin challenges solution of an incident that the truth should be revealed beyond Shibata instantly.
However, the woman quantity student who came forward saying "I killed" in front of Shibata enervated [ almost ] appears ...
Now which the conclusion with the enemy "Asakura" of connection already attached, "Mayama" returns to the ordinary detective of two sections as before, and has become the deployment [ like the beginning of a drama ] whose 今作 is also that Shibata perceives the trick of a murder case.
That is not right, either, if it is said by past [ some of ] according to this incident whether understand.
Only the question whether it is really in "Asakura" in "it is unreal" remains, and the scene of the last also finishes ...
And Taro Kin.
as [ reflect / "special editing" plays an active part and / thing / for 300 seconds / with the movie version ] -- と -- even if -- it is the thin supporting player of a shadow -- [ -- + / -- The movie version / -- + / -- + / -- + -- ] + -- + Memory returns and the client of a new incident comes to Shibata which became the chief of one criminal-investigation two staffs.
It says that I want you to participate in the party which invited the persons who survived by sinking of the luxury liner of 15 years ago, and Shibata and Mayama participate in it.
A one woman is in an island and she says that it erases one survivor at a time.
While it becomes actual and being killed gradually, Shibata moves in order to solve the mystery ...
Although the question which remained by "special editing" considered whether it would be solved by it, it finishes, while it has completely been unknown.
And an incident is solved in 120 minutes and before or after 70 minutes, and Shibata and Mayama enter in the dream after that.
Is [ when did it say or two persons entered into the dream, and ] Mayama dreams truly, or is it in Asakura?
A mystery, a mystery, a mystery ......
Only questions increase.
And Shibata which came to its senses on the boat.
Mayama who appears before her.
Although ?
which becomes what after this will be thought, it is ending as it is ......
One, "special editing", and this movie are what to have wanted to transmit to a televiewer by doing a continuation ...
The incident in a movie and the past of Shibata and others are not related at all.
謎解き of the murder case of a passage changes the first half, a direction always changes the second half, and it is in a dream ...
What is clarified.
It does not understand at all about the person of Shibata and Mayama's past ?
Asakura.
Why was a screen version made to what [ to do by the special of a drama like "special editing", if it is contents of this level generally ]?
is it that thing out of which it comes and that is seen on a paddle screen?
Since it was popular, I can consider only by the contents of having made from laver.
What also often breaks impression of that last is done ...
Mayama who looks for Asakura while escaping from a sweep, and Shibata which it is going to stop.
It is the drama version which all finished, and anything does not have as for what was obtained, and impressed and finished with Mayama who has only what was lost and screams ......
It should have been made to finish it as that absolutely ...
it feels, and it comes out, and it is made to revive, however they except Shibata who say the man who must have died "was ---- in fact" die from the movie version again ...
whether to be actual in whether it is in a dream -- it does not understand well It is the incomprehensible sequel to which 超 is attached, and is the work which should not have been made by any means.
------------------------------------------------ [others] ------------------------------------------------ With the movie version, the treatment of Mr.
彩 is too severe ......
Moreover, the rearrangement in the incident of the first half has not become at all.
------------------------------------------------ [remarks] ------------------------------------------------ One of the 邦画 which we judge and do not recommend to you Since it is this, I will be able to think that a Japanese work is useless.
"Special editing" of evaluation "is very bad." Since the contents are past [ wrong ], a movie is [ that it is not a work as a movie, and ] the "worst." Since it synthesized and "Toru Mayama" existed, it is "very bad." at least -- Chief Nonomura -- that -- I wanted you to complete at least an inside story ("every day of love" だっけ ?) Although there is probably no change in being "very bad" though completed ...
Probably, it was made the "worst" if there was not Mayama ...
It is the way currently seen also now indulgently.
the time of finishing seeing the drama version again, although looked above somewhat indulgently before correction -- "-- this continuation is such a trash -- よな ......
sadness which breaks impression of the last " ......
And it is earnest in "disappear" of several seconds after, and I have considered.
Although it changes constantly and does not those[ with explanation ]-ま, I will consider as the "worst" too.

2006/06/22 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by 夙夜健 Provider: 18384 Host:18446 Browser: 6287
looking-at [ television series ]-only last talk kana -- I do not understand well Although it thought that the subject matter of 本作 seems to be interesting, this was more difficult than the above-mentioned thing.
Moreover, it is if it decides by the impression of those days since it does not become [ mind of seeing ].
"It is bad.
" It becomes.

2006/03/06 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by Matsu Provider: 34197 Host:34255 Browser: 3846
The theater version of drama keizoku.
Although the drama had improved very much ...
A dream and reality of a movie are confused.
Somewhere are in a dream...
Where is actual?
I do not understand well.
Or is all it the dream of Shibata?
Up to the place which solves the mystery of an incident and goes, Shibata and Mayama can still be seen somehow.
however, a punch line -- a dream -- saying [ punch line ] ...

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.