Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map

AllAnimeGameComicNovelDramaSp. effectJP movieMovie	Info:voice,game..	Reviewers	Diary
Search / Outside DB:

Japan movie ranking: Rank 811/in 866 titles (Total -6.00/Deviation 43.82) Rank 810 <= => Rank 812
Japan movie ranking of 1996: Rank 15/in 16 titles Rank 14 <= => Rank 16

Yatsuhaka Mura(Japan movie)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Information about this title

Fuji Television Kadokawa Shoten Publishing Co.,Ltd. Toho
Kon Ichikawa
Seishi Yokomizo
Hitoshi komuro
Etsushi Toyokawa
Yuko Asano
Takahashikazuya
Takeshi Kato
Mai Kitajima
Hisako Manda

[Detail]

Shigeru Kouyama
Kishibeixutoku
Kyoko Kishida
Hideko Yoshida
Kayoko Shiraishi
Tsuyoshi Ojiki
Renji Ishibashi
Saburo Ishikura
Masayuki Imai
Junkichi Orimoto
Masahiko Nishimura
Akiji Kobayashi
Hisashi Igawa
Shin Takuma
Sayaka Osawa
Kawasakihiroshi

Released:1996/10/26 in Japan

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	Japan movieRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Bad(-1.20)	811	43.82	-6.00

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	4,127	5	5
Outside Japan	293	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

0.0%

20.0%

0.0%

40.0%

20.0%

Added percentage

20%

40%

80%

100%

Summary

20%

20.0%

60%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation New!
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation New!
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2005/11/07 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by 634 Provider: 13007 Host:12668 Browser: 5234
There is admiration which is only the work which arranged only a player's member.
Suspense & it is hard to say that the Yokomizo world of horror was drawn in the form made into the kitchen, and 1/10 of the merits of an old movie have not come out, either.
Probably because Kon Ichikawa had also lost the power of old days, I was not able to think at all that command was also good.
As the cast also said with a background "only the gorgeous casts are not collected and a good thing is not necessarily made earnestly", performance had also floated very much except the veteran actor.
It was the touch which the veteran actors were also spoiled somewhere and were doing in the mood.
Probably, the consciousness that a movie company would also build a movie from this time also for FUJI, a sponsor, directly was lacked.
If it has in stock the remake of an old movie, and the gorgeous cast, I will think that the movie reached the very simplistic idea of succeeding and has been used as such a work.
First of all, although Etsuji Toyokawa could be said that the trial itself in which it would be made Heisei version Kindaichi was miscasting, as a result of doing as it is, end smell Kindaichi has been done, so that it does not become in any way.
It was not visible as the actors who surround the Kindaichi had also only united with the end stink in the bad meaning.
Now, there are けど in which performance as a player and the difference in a rank will have the direction of Kiyoshi Atsumi's Tora-san 金田 1, and a memory which was good for 遥.
Etsuji Toyokawa regards this Tora-san 金田 1 as there having been nothing to reference.
It could be said that it was a primary failure to have thought that it was in that there is no guarantee of arranging it in the style of the present age, and not necessarily hitting it earnestly just because it flew the big hit a long time ago, and to have built.
Although there was probably also consideration which it is going to unite with a present age people's opinion, the admiration to which it also became rough somewhere was not able to be denied.
This bad tendency has come out not only in a movie but in animation and a drama notably.
It will lean on old merit and may be the thought by which the feeling of [ to skillful く商売 ] the method of connecting for it leans also on a certain semantic straw.
However, all will become a par if the method of comrades does not have an important product, either.
Although the members of work of a movie who also write sponsor pigeons may probably have had the feeling and uneasiness of this neighborhood, it has come out with hakkiri by evaluation of 本作.
Having brought a result which applies mud even to the product of not only the monochrome that is such ways of building and was renewed but the past only brought a result which are not whom [ any ] other than the worst, either, and although I will think in addition to it, it does not occur.
Have the members of work and the sponsor noticed only attaching a crack even to the signboard of the work with which easy renewal-ization of "an old hit article" became not only the work but 母胎?

2005/08/29 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by 古典主義 Provider: 2622 Host:2593 Browser: 5234
Only the trash which arranged face.
Since the prison of convention and a deep-seated grudge is an attractive talk, Kindaichi has to have "8 墓村" by the supporting actor.
Essence is disregarded in order to stand kyara.
Isn't Director Ichikawa the man of only a picture these days (even if it says, the past ten - 15 years are so much), either?
Those with value which Atsumi Kindaichi of 77 editions looks at.
The masterpiece which drew "the deep-seated grudge which still continues going", making it a modern play although it probably did not go into the direction which has an excessive hope for Kindaichi at mind.
It is it a completely deplorable limitation to make such a trash based on the Nomura version.

2005/08/29 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by プー太郎 Provider: 51281 Host:51127 Browser: 5234
this work -- the original itself -- although that is right, the way describing him by whom Kindaichi's inference is involved in the convention of 8 墓村, the miserable past, and a criminal's trap not a subject but for the purpose of Tatsuya Tajimi thinks that there is 面白み as a tale The way of being a supporting player to the last regards Kindaichi here as good.

2005/05/05 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by kinji Provider: 8381 Host:8343 Browser: 4483
As a mystery movie, there is no device in a 謎解き portion, and there is no thrill as a suspense movie.
It is awfully [ the whole ] monotonous and the impression to which only a tale progresses to indifferently and dies remains.
It is wonderful that there is no sign that the atrocious event 26 years before remaining in the convention of an old family and memory of complicated human relations, the fearful traditions which get across to the house of a village headman, and villagers vividly etc.
completely casts a shadow dark in a tale.
In the tale, even feeling of purity of a certain kind is drifting.
Character molding of characters is also thin and individuality is not in sight.
Altogether, such words are depreciated to a movie and are complaints.
Then, if it says whether this movie was got blocked, it is wonderful that such a thing never cannot be found.
Conversely, by around the end of a movie, I was completely drunk by atmosphere and was intently won over to the narrative style tone of a frank movie just.
This is the power of the fun which Masashi Yokomizo's original has, and the image which Director Kon Ichikawa makes.
the okaru [ serial murders / to which he raped the criminal ] "8 grave Myojin's curse" -- it is carrying out tick reason attachment, and 撹乱さ criminal investigation of criminal investigation -- it うと In order to use such a criminal's action principle as a persuasive thing, do the spectators of a movie also enable it not to understand the common recognition in the villagers "8 grave Myojin's curse"?
Although "the inheritor of 田治見家 who was indebted to the whole family for the grudge of fleeing soldier murder dies one after another, and doing of the revengeful ghost of the warriors who cannot yet dispel a grudge dies" is the scenario which the criminal prepared, this movie is making explanation of the hit fly off.
There will be having remained only at mere "succession-of-property argument", and this whole movie will become a tale it is severe and thin and frank as a result.
Etsushi Toyokawa who plays hero Kosuke Kindaichi -- expectation -- being contrary -- ぜんぜん -- it was useless words are continued for a long time, without carrying out breathing -- that sticky way of talking is truly "it is - す at Furuhata duties Saburo" って touch Although possibly it was going to take out the individuality of Kindaichi new as him, you may not devise in such a trivial place.
If it is made common, it is なぁ although it is attractive enough.
Its 1 person よ is absorbed in a りな play, and なっちゃった another side is Yuuko Asano useless.
This man is one person, strove to make a fearful atmosphere of "8 墓村", and has floated completely from the whole.
the general society where, as for Tatsuya suddenly called to 田治見家, spectators belong, the custom of an old family, and a extended family's bondage -- a color -- it is a kind of guide who connects 8 墓村 which remain deeply It is being [ it / necessary / to make a narrator into Tatsuya ] kana though the hero of a tale is Kindaichi.
"8 墓村" って -- the talk said right [ that ] -- しょ On a movie, even if the viewpoint which takes the lead understood where it would be and ずらく and Kindaichi had pulled the tale with as, it was not visible.
Although Kindaichi is to call it a noted detective, does he only verify subsequently about the crime which happened, and prevent a crime?
Although said clearly, anyone will be able to do in a after-the-fact commentary etc.
As 謎解き, it is the movie of the minimum category.

2004/06/29 Good [Original Japanese review]
by 興正寺蓮秀 Provider: 4992 Host:5107 Browser: 3646
A work which the face of only this is arranged well and called a shelf.
It does not remain in an impression comparatively [ the ].
At the rate [ -- ] by which Director Ichikawa took the megaphone again obtaining -- ~ ん For honest others, the scene in 桜舞散る of a 32-person (?) murder of an example is anyhow good touch, although beauty and fear were wonderful.
Or [ that it is satisfactory if even this scene is seen ].
even if it says from the degree of exposure -- too -- Ishizaka -- じ and Ikkou Furuya are good like this

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.