Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Japan movie ranking: Rank 293/in 883 titles (Total 3.00/Deviation 50.02) Rank 292 <= => Rank 294
Japan movie ranking of 1968: Rank 3/in 11 titles Rank 2 <= => Rank 4

Yokai Daisenso 1968(Japan movie)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Information about this title

Daiei
Yoshiyuki Kuroda
Rokko Toura
Yoshihiko Aoyama

Released:1968/12/14 in Japan

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	Japan movieRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Good(1.00)	293	50.02	3.00

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	2,326	3	3
Outside Japan	155	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

0.0%

100.0%

0.0%

Added percentage

100%

100%

Summary

100%

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation New!
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation New!
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/06/09 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Katoru Provider: 4749 Host:4768 Browser: 5234
No one but uncanny production was Hideyasu a long time ago.
It is drawn in deployment of the talk.

2006/09/02 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Morochi Provider: 1929 Host:1584 Browser: 7142
It will admire, if the entertainment work with which it will be full of the good imagination nature so far in the time of only this if it sees just at first based on the work years 1968, although it was merely in this too much old image and production agape is made.
the stage -- the time of Edo -- also replacing -- although the taste may suit, I think that it was preeminent for the affinity with the supernatural creatures who appear above all a thing called が妖怪 from the first -- not only fearfulness Although there is an image which there is not with where and is attractive (certain -- although it thinks that the authority's illustration is the cause -- w), this movie a kappa and 油す -- although it says that it is interesting and they are supernatural creatures on the scene of the beginning, better negotiations It carries out.
it is the book which the そりゃ man who was able to laugh wrote to carrying out to a supernatural creature social register and Japanese supernatural creature large pictorial book みたいな本 -- www of ろっつ - it was the image of the especially old historical play average -- It is not a splendid thing in a special makeup etc., free wore the form of the supernatural creature who comes out, or Daemon (vampire), although it was a thing, the atmosphere which said some as the air or suited a theme called supernatural creature large war has come out, and it was likable.

2006/03/06 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Patapata Provider: 3432 Host:3339 Browser: 5237
Even if the supernatural creatures who talk blankly in the dialect of every place took, it was good in it being unexpected, and was kind also to the child, and were they attractive?
Is it the movie which agreeable touch carries out rather than there was also a comical place very well and it can laugh?
A time background thinks that the Edo period was also good.
Although there was a feeling of tension as it is, of course and there is also serious depiction, is it softened involuntarily in a pastoral atmosphere which still (Daemon of a villain's part fully gave dreadfulness) covers this whole movie?

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.