Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews
Others
Site map

Search / Outside DB:

Comics ranking: Rank 4,082/in 4,186 titles (Total -16.02/Deviation 44.87) Rank 4,081 <= => Rank 4,083
Comics ranking of 2005: Rank 133/in 141 titles Rank 132 <= => Rank 134

BLAN no syokutaku(Comics)


[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)
ForumImages
Information about this title

Kazuki Sakuraba
SQUARE ENIX
GANGAN POWERD

Released:2005/06/24 in Japan
Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)
 AverageComicsRankDeviation(Total)Evaluation points(Total)Best of the Best
Inside JapanWorst(-2.67)4,08244.87-16.02 

Statics of activity

Total ViewsCommentEvaluation
Inside Japan2,49576
Outside Japan15200

How others evaluated in Japan

BestVery GoodGoodNormalBadVery BadWorst
People0000105
Percentage0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%16.7%0.0%83.3%
Added percentage0%0%0%0%16.7%16.7%100%
Summary0%0%100%
                                                                                                   

Views for recent 8 days
Total765432131
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0

LanguageSorted by dateSorted by recommendation
EnglishGood
(Only Evaluation)
Normal
(Only Evaluation)
Bad
(Only Evaluation)
All
(Only Evaluation)
None
JapaneseGood
(Only Evaluation)
Normal
(Only Evaluation)
Bad
(Only Evaluation)
All
(Only Evaluation)
None
This reputation board


Post your review / Top page
The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2007/04/19 Comment(normal) [Original Japanese review]
by Yamemaidaa Provider: 31524 Host:31408 Browser: 6342
A kyara setup is spirally similar ^^; Well, on the whole, it is very hard to see.
There are many useless top rates and there are too many unnecessary tones.
Important contents were not quite satisfactory, either and I carried out [ mind as it has idled somewhere ].

2007/01/10 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by TCC Provider: 32579 Host:32463 Browser: 4184
although it seems that something is disreputable -- kana also with unavoidable it -- the kana ......
is [ kana ] the first impression It is made to make a contract, considering a setup by the non-earth people....
There is no freshness at って and a setup which was seen by some comics, and a picture is also coarse in whether there are many tones.
Although it may be able to see hopelessly.
It said that it was painful that a bottom is shallow and gag faking ていたけど and the focus have shifted to the heroine in NO1 or the talk of 2, or it was cold and inference was only spoiled.
Well, it goes into a cancer cancer 悪萌え work group, and is ひぐ made paワーdo, and severer things, such as the master of mine, also have series and this, and if compared with them, it is still visible to mashi completely.
Well, evaluation is "bad."
2006/11/19 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Gajumaru Provider: 31845 Host:31745 Browser: 4184
the っちゃあってるけど homepage which illustrating has in cancer cancer with a picture like a coterie magazine -- work information -- together -- gay 描いてる of teiruzu -- I want to say "don't use the fellow who does not attach distinction of a hobby [ like ] and work, either" being hard to see, since a deep thing is used all over so that the tone like the only arms may also deceive a dirty line -- it is supreme Is that the picture is poor from the time of complete fancy?
The talk has changed the author from per the time of a series start, and 3 talks.
The author notation of a book is the way of an after [ 3 talks ].
It is a question that anything did not have explanation since it was official about this, although what complication there was did not know.
The way of contents changes two talk one talk, and のころ is a schoolchild partner's inference thing level immediately.
The original author changes individually, fantasy foods become strong and the drier one feels it very better.
However, isn't it a betrayal act to a reader after all because it is a game convention unawares to take out inference to the front and sell it, if the sales message of a book and the influence at the time of a series start something are seen?

2006/11/03 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by さんぽ中 Provider: 13905 Host:13717 Browser: 5234
Does it 丸被り with a setup which it was made to cooperate forcibly by the person who consumes the "mystery" which appeared suddenly [ a certain / day ], was brandished, and was seen with -- and some weekly magazine?
A picture is hard to see too.
The too insensitive main line results from multiple use of a tone.
There is no charm also in a character, and it is sometimes for the place of a picture and has become an unpleasant face and the unpleasant body.
A picture and a story are below the average.

2006/09/07 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Perikan Provider: 21484 Host:21598 Browser: 4184
The tone which is hard to see first above all sticks, and すぎ is accelerating the difficulty of seeing.
A character cannot be distinguished, either, and if there are many tops which are not understood what 8s てん it is in the least, the talk is not known well, either.
make it the talk touch that it will show a reader does not talk -- make it illustrating -- I want you to make it more intelligible That the author changed from the middle is whether to be fancy....

2006/05/22 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Rarena Provider: 8937 Host:8810 Browser: 3875
The book was read anew....
Cover:coating is beautiful and this is the passing mark.
Talk: As a mystery thing, it is with whether it is the lower one.
The method of there being also no trick which showed off 奇 and finding a criminal is forcing.
A cherry tree yard student's work "GOSICK" is, although it is very wonderful....
Could it come and was the original of the cherry tree yard student carried out truly?
The talk is also for the place into which the fantasy is put strangely, and is poor.
[ of directivity ] Although a setup is interesting as it is ....
Picture: It is very much hard to see although visual は of kyara is good.
し [ the sketch of kyara is also amusing ] ....
A picture is member 臭ぷんぷん.
Mr.
葉月 is kana after acting also as the member.
Character: Don't feel imaichi charm.
As said also in the place of visual は and a picture, on the whole, it is liking.
Evaluation is the "worst." Is the only help it only coating of a color that kyara is visual?

2005/07/08 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Provider: 3801 Host:3934 Browser: 4483
し [ this work is amazed considering the first talk of a series ] -- It is quotation from a diary.
The new series from a table -bloody dining- now (work : Kazuki Sakuraba, drawing : 葉月翼) number of BLAN.
Disagreeable -- It is sulky about poor [ as usual ], and is ぇ.
Although a teacher's work was seen from Mr.
葉月 ?
complete time -- haha -- it is not visible to comics any longer There are too many tones and it is past [ komaワri 多 ].
Talk -- Is it are?
It carries out [ spiral + soul iitaa + 屍姫 + evil spirit dictionary + ひぐ ], and is a 錬金術師 (arumoni of angel who cannot fly) / shuupi aria = new series of + steel without の at the time.
up to [ here ] -- pakuri -- also understanding (moreover all cancer cancer work) -- it is the first a setup is interesting -- be alike and carry out -- since most is pakuri, expect how, considering hard to see [ of a ねぇ --?
pattern ] A setup is the grade which can be read well.
The rest is a place which I want to carry out somehow that pattern (longwise, a slippage eye, and a tone using [ an eye ] above too much).

Post your review / Top page
ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.
Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.



Please give your evaluation or comment.

You need two other people's comment to post your comment again after you post your evaluation or comment.

Your Name(Required)
Password (Required. more than 4 characters)
Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.
Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.


Top page of DB | Site map | Copyright(c) 1999- 1st Class All rights reserved