Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews
Others
Site map

Search / Outside DB:

Comics ranking: Rank 3,613/in 4,212 titles (Total -1.96/Deviation 48.03) Rank 3,612 <= => Rank 3,614
Comics average points ranking: Rank 529/in 693 titles (Average -0.14(Good)/Deviation 43.41) Rank 528 <= => Rank 530 (more than 10 evaluatoin)

BUSIZAWA RECEIVE(Comics)


[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)
ForumImages

Information about this title

Kyosuke Usuta
Weekly Boys Jump
SHUEISHA

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)
 AverageComicsRankDeviation(Total)Evaluation points(Total)Best of the Best
Inside JapanGood(-0.14)3,61348.03-1.96 

Statics of activity

Total ViewsCommentEvaluation
Inside Japan3,8081414
Outside Japan22400

How others evaluated in Japan

BestVery GoodGoodNormalBadVery BadWorst
People0341222
Percentage0.0%21.4%28.6%7.1%14.3%14.3%14.3%
Added percentage0%21.4%50%57.1%71.4%85.7%100%
Summary50%7.1%42.9%
                                                                                                  

Views for recent 8 days
Total109876543
11
1
2
3
1
0
0
2
2

LanguageSorted by dateSorted by recommendation
EnglishGood
(Only Evaluation)
Normal
(Only Evaluation)
Bad
(Only Evaluation)
All
(Only Evaluation)
None
JapaneseGood
(Only Evaluation)
Normal
(Only Evaluation)
Bad
(Only Evaluation)
All
(Only Evaluation)
All
This reputation board


Post your review / Top page
The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/03/01 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by Sorasouyo Provider: 54140 Host:54142 Browser: 4184
so so the opening part -- although it is interesting, rather than Mr.
Masaru, it is markedly alike and falls The last round is wonderful although it becomes quite less boring from the middle!
evaluation is bad if that last round does not exist -- probably it was alike and was carrying out
2007/11/17 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Tamekichi Provider: 19906 Host:19808 Browser: 10759
In all, it is thin and is Mr.
degradation Masaru.
There is admiration which is putting in the hetakuso battle by force, and tempo is also bad.
A punch line as well as Mr.
Masaru has no 投げっぱ.
It works in a pair 2 and is 終わりって ....
probably, the close also has a way in others -- make it strange [ finish ] like this what -- it wants to carry out the direction -- うすた
2007/08/28 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by Noosan Provider: 47736 Host:47522 Browser: 5292
This work was useless although Mr.
Masaru of a previous work waited in the jar.
Was incomprehensibility peculiar to Mr.
うすた lacking?
Charm was not felt for kyara whatever it might call it.
Did the last merely do?
Who expected that it was finished as chronology?
Only the last talk was good.
Evaluation is "very bad."
2007/08/07 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by Kouki Provider: 9407 Host:9597 Browser: 5978
It was fairly interesting.
Although there was also a place which is not loaded in the portion of the second half and which is not, I think that gag and shiriasu were used properly well.
How to finish the last was considerably surprised and it was able to be laughed at it.

2007/06/06 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by 三つ葉 Provider: 12661 Host:12696 Browser: 2893(Mobile)
It was a mistake that it was going to make it the battle route.
It became serious suddenly and Mr.
うすた flavor has been lost.
Although it was able to be laughed at reunion of impression after it collected with chronology and all finished.
it just said that it was bad well -- it is
2005/12/09 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Provider: 13951 Host:13748 Browser: 5234
The 2nd honesty did not need to be taken out.
It is なっちゃってる to gudaguda.
The gag of one volume was able to be enjoyed very well.
Where Although there may be some persons who consider very, since it is up to men in the jar of laughter etc., it is unavoidable.
Talk only 1 話って's of the receipt to くせ of てゆ - or 武士沢 receipt is uke る.

2005/12/08 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by syo Provider: 3056 Host:2839 Browser: 4487
It is a delicate work whatever it may take [ that there is also shortness called a total of two volumes, and it becomes 尻すぼみ to have given story nature although it is good, and it finishes with the place where the gag of author original also establishes and feels easy at, and can read a character now ].
Although it could also come, it might mean and it may have carried out by having made it gudaguda purposely when the past work was seen, even so, it is a delicate work.
Since an atmosphere peculiar to the author also also well bad fumes, "Mr.
Masaru" is the liking and good range out of which it comes and which an unbearable person can permit.
Those who begin and look at this author's comics should feel the thing insufficient which does not carry out a situation.
having read and lost -- までは -- although not said, I do not think that you could read I will want to purchase, if the うすた Kyosuke work is collected.

2005/04/28 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Esupaa Provider: 8276 Host:8286 Browser: 4184
It was regrettable that it was a short-term series.
well -- also coming out -- although the fun of Mr.
8 ぱ Masaru or a jaguar has not exceeded ...
Although it was shameful something, the laver of the hero monochrome at which it can laugh was good.
"evaluation -- it is good" -- appropriate kana
2005/04/14 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by 神尾そら Provider: 333 Host:284 Browser: 4925
Since it has run in a little serious direction, the image with which gag faded ....
That last round is still the thing which remains in a tradition in a 色んな meaning.
Evaluation is about "it is very good" at such a translation.

2004/12/23 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Gannaa Provider: 36398 Host:36433 Browser: 3646
Although that way of finishing of the けど last with interesting 武士沢 roller and braid with the place at which it can laugh everywhere although a rank falls compared with a jaguar or Mr.
Masaru was incomprehensible, seemingly it was Mr.
うすた and he liked it.

2004/12/22 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by 破壊大帝 Provider: 8533 Host:8564 Browser: 4184
Although all うすた works suit the skin, especially this has the strong admiration which had strayed.
It is reunion with the hero who could not stop stray, but became a dozens of years after uncle after digesting in a picture neglectful in the last round although it seemed that the imitation thing of story comics was also carrying out whether it was suspected as gag having also been a still more childish impression and it not suiting its conventional reader, and the enemy who is ruined completely and is working at the convenience store, and, finally is.
It does not understand because it has hit by the jaguar now, although it thought then "this is also a one-shot gambler or ...." (in all meanings).
Although WJ has the bad habit which crushes popular comics full of gags itself by abuse and route change not suiting of the author, route change is the style (popularity does not come out like my taa or a luck man) which is subtracted as a result, and is impressed by the talent of Mr.
うすた who can also meet the demand of an editorial department flexibly apart from evaluation of a work.

2004/11/29 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Raito Provider: 3618 Host:3567 Browser: 3646
although it obtains, and there are also ~ ん and a cause which has finished immediately and seldom being deeply remained in the impression -- -- which has only the comics of the same original author as a Masaru Mr.
& jaguar well, and has a memory which was interesting comics -- ga -- for which I feel that there was also a time of neta at which it can laugh very occasionally
2004/11/28 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by Noeru Provider: 7333 Host:7364 Browser: 3875
He did not so like.
し [ it was not interesting than expected ].
Or [ that there is also a cause expected too much since he liked Mr.
Masaru too ].
But since the directivity of gag was clearly obvious unlike Mr.
Masaru, do not load ordinarily individually and there was nothing.
Be fastidious.
All なんっつ -, and kyara and story deployment was also thin, did not remain in an impression, and was cut.
It is closed and I think that they are natural comics.

2004/11/28 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by Burakku mao Provider: 16709 Host:16499 Browser: 3922
Although these comics had finished it as only two volumes, they were interesting.
I can regret having stuffed the last and the talk too much.
The view of the world peculiar to Mr.
うすた was still good.
し [ it was able to laugh also at gag ].
Also or [ the direction to refer to as a story which to be, either ].
The hero part (the present super hero part A) is doing hero ごっこ at first, built it, and although were and being cooked, it came to do that seemingly it is a hero gradually later.
よな [ became / the after division manager / Chiharu and ] 武士沢 established ...
don't say that it takes out also with a sequel -
Post your review / Top page
ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.
Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.



Please give your evaluation or comment.

You need two other people's comment to post your comment again after you post your evaluation or comment.

Your Name(Required)
Password (Required. more than 4 characters)
Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.
Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.


Top page of DB | Site map | Copyright(c) 1999- 1st Class All rights reserved