Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Comics ranking: Rank 1,029/in 4,176 titles (Total 5.01/Deviation 49.59) Rank 1,028 <= => Rank 1,030

Chou baku madou den sureiya-zu(Comics)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Information about this title

Hajime Kanzaka

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	ComicsRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Very good(1.67)	1,029	49.59	5.01

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	1,187	3	3
Outside Japan	81	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

33.3%

0.0%

66.7%

0.0%

Added percentage

33.3%

100%

100%

Summary

100%

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation New!
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation New!
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2006/11/21 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Perikan Provider: 21484 Host:21598 Browser: 3876
It is [ animation-ization which was able to be enjoyed very much is also carried out repeatedly, and / the theater version ] and was popular those days.
It is animation and a novel that it was popular, and since it was also late for comics to have had few numbers of turns and to have come out, although it does not understand, I consider [ having collected finely and ] the degree of popularity.
The aria of magic was also rather smart and arrangement work etc.
was invigorating.
Since there were many technical terms that it is very well hard to conclude that it sees now, it was thought that it was hard to carry out quite satisfactory understanding.

2005/03/08 Good [Original Japanese review]
by 美代子 Provider: 32756 Host:32742 Browser: 2746(Mobile)
Skillful く組み合わせ and original episode also incorporated original part I and original animation, and it was rather interesting.
Isn't the talk itself the passing mark, carrying out even the one - two volume middle to original composition, and modeling a rough flow on animation after that, although it is originally near and full marks do not go?
rodeimasu & which has seldom played an active part in an original or animation individually; it was glad that zorufu was able to play an active part so so.

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.